Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-xm8r8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-19T20:24:49.415Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

When Australian defence procurement goes wrong: Improving outcomes in a troubled contractual environment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2023

Jenny Stewart*
Affiliation:
The University of New South Wales, Australia
Tony Ablong
Affiliation:
The University of New South Wales, Australia
*
Jenny Stewart, School of Business, University of New South Wales, Canberra, BC 2610, Australia. Email: j.stewart@adfa.edu.au

Abstract

Defence procurement is a notoriously difficult and often controversial field of public management. In Australia, problems with schedule and budget overruns have been addressed through business process reforms aimed at tightening control and improving professionalism. However, studies of complex contracting in other contexts show the importance of relational factors of trust, collaboration and risk-sharing. These factors are not encouraged by the predominantly transactionally based contractual environment of Defence. Based on a detailed examination of three case studies, we suggest that there is a disjunct between the types of controls that are applied by Defence and the requirements of delivering complex, long-term projects involving multiple stakeholders. The need for both improved flexibility as well as heightened accountability is evident. We argue that balancing these values involves processes that encourage, rather than discourage, communication, risk-sharing and trust.

Type
Non-Symposium Article
Copyright
© The Author(s) 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aulich, C, O’Flynn, J (2007) From public to private: the Australian experience of privatisation. The Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration 29(2): 153171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Australian National Audit Office (ANAO) (2001) Status reporting of major defence projects. Audit Report no. 24 2001-2002, 10 December. Canberra, ACT, Australia: Commonwealth of Australia.Google Scholar
Australian National Audit Office (ANAO) (2006) Management of the M113 armoured personnel carrier upgrade project. Audit Report no. 3 2005–06 Performance Audit, 28 July. Canberra, ACT, Australia: Commonwealth of Australia.Google Scholar
Australian National Audit Office (ANAO) (2008a) 2007–08 major projects report defence materiel organisation. Auditor-General Report no. 9 2007-2008 Assurance Report, 27 November. Canberra, ACT, Australia: Commonwealth of Australia.Google Scholar
Australian National Audit Office (ANAO) (2008b) Management of the FFG capability upgrade. Audit Report no. 11 2007–2008 Performance Audit, 31 October. Canberra, ACT, Australia: Commonwealth of Australia.Google Scholar
Australian National Audit Office (ANAO) (2009a) The super seasprite. ANAO Audit Report no. 41 2008-2009 Performance Audit, 17 June. Canberra, ACT, Australia: Commonwealth of Australia.Google Scholar
Australian National Audit Office (ANAO) (2009b) Management of the Collins-class operations sustainment. Audit Report no. 23 2008-2009 Performance Audit, 25 February. Canberra, ACT, Australia: Commonwealth of Australia.Google Scholar
Australian National Audit Office (ANAO) (2009c) 2008-2009 major projects report defence materiel organisation. Auditor-General Report no. 13 2009-2010 Assurance Report, 24 November. Canberra, ACT, Australia: Commonwealth of Australia.Google Scholar
Australian National Audit Office (ANAO) (2009d) Management of the M113 armoured personnel carrier upgrade project. Audit Report no. 27 2008–2009, 27 March. Canberra, ACT, Australia: Commonwealth of Australia.Google Scholar
Australian National Audit Office (ANAO) (2010) Light-weight torpedo replacement project. Audit Report no. 37 2009-2010, 20 May. Canberra, ACT, Australia: Commonwealth of Australia.Google Scholar
Australian National Audit Office (ANAO) (2012a) Upgrade of the M113 fleet of armoured vehicles. Audit Report no. 34 2011–2012 Performance Audit. Canberra, ACT, Australia: Commonwealth of Australia.Google Scholar
Australian National Audit Office (ANAO) (2012b) 2011-2012 major projects report defence materiel organisation. Auditor-General Report no. 15 2012–2013 Assurance Report, 19 December. Canberra, ACT, Australia: Commonwealth of Australia.Google Scholar
Australian Senate (Foreign Affairs Defence and Trade References Committee) (2011) Procurement Procedures for Defence Capital Projects Preliminary Report. Canberra, ACT, Australia: Commonwealth of Australia. Available at: http://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Committees/Senate_Committees?url=fadt_ctte/completed_inquiries/2010-13/procurement/interim_report_2/index.htm (accessed 28 March 2013).Google Scholar
Australian Senate (Foreign Affairs Defence and Trade References Committee) (2012) Procurement Procedures for Defence Capital Projects Final Report. Canberra, ACT, Australia: Commonwealth of Australia.Google Scholar
Bittleston, M (1990) Co-operation or competition? Defence procurement options for the 1990s: introduction. Adelphi Papers 30(250): 39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bloomfield, P (2006) The challenging business of long-term public-private partnerships: reflections on local experience. Public Administration Review 66(3): 400411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bushell, E (2011) Review of defence materiel organisation major projects report 2009-2010. Submission to the Senate Foreign Affairs, Defence and Trade References Committee Inquiry into Procurement Procedures for Major Capital Projects. Available at: http://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Committees/House_of_Representatives_Committees?url=jcpaa/defenceannual0311/subs/sub1.pdf (accessed 22 March 2013accessed 22 March 2013).Google Scholar
Chung, D (2008) Developing an analytical framework for analysing and assessing public-private partnerships: a hospital case study. Economic and Labour Relations Review 19(2): 6990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Defence Materiel Organisation (2012) Introducing the Defence Materiel Organisation. Canberra, ACT, Australia: Department of Defence.Google Scholar
Department of Defence (2000) Defence 2000: Our Future Defence Force. Canberra, ACT, Australia: Commonwealth of Australia.Google Scholar
Department of Defence (2009) Defending Australia in the Asia Pacific Century: Force 2030. Canberra, ACT, Australia: Commonwealth of Australia.Google Scholar
Department of Defence (2011) Annual Report 2009-2010. vol. 2. Canberra, ACT, Australia: Commonwealth of Australia.Google Scholar
Department of Defence (2012) Annual Report 2010-20-11. vol. 2. Canberra, ACT, Australia: Commonwealth of Australia.Google Scholar
Edelenbos, J, Klijn, E (2007) Trust in complex decision-making networks: a theoretical and empirical exploration. Administration & Society 39(1): 2550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fairbrother, P, Paddon, M, Teicher, J (2002) Privatisation, Globalisation and Labour: Studies from Australia. Leichhardt, NSW, Australia: Federation Press.Google Scholar
Hardy, R (2012) Partnering – can it be successfully achieved? Defense Management Journal (37). Available at: http://www.defencemanagement.com (accessed 12 January 2013).Google Scholar
Lian, P, Laing, A (2004) Public sector purchasing of health services: a comparison with private sector purchasing. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management 10(6): 247256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDuffie, J (2011) Inter-organizational trust and the dynamics of distrust. Journal of International Business Studies 42(1): 3547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGuffog, T (2011) Improving value and certainty in defence procurement. Public Money & Management 31(6): 427432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mortimer, D (2008) Going to the next level. Report of the defence procurement and sustainment review, 18 September. Canberra, ACT, Australia: Commonwealth of Australia.Google Scholar
Queensland Government Department of Infrastructure and Planning (2010) Project Assurance Framework: Policy for Alliance Contracting. Brisbane, QLD, Australia: Department of Infrastructure and Planning.Google Scholar
Reeves, E (2008) The practice of contracting in public-private partnerships: transaction costs and relational contracting in the Irish schools sector. Public Administration 86(4): 969986.Google Scholar
Rizzo, P (2011) Plan to Reform Support Ship Repair and Management Practices. Canberra, ACT, Australia: Commonwealth of Australia.Google Scholar
Royal United Services Institute (RUSI) (2009) The Conspiracy of Optimism. London: RUSI.Google Scholar
Sanderson, J (2009) Buyer-supplier partnering in UK defence procurement: looking beyond the policy rhetoric. Public Administration 87(2): 327350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Senate Standing Committee on Foreign Affairs, Defence and Trade (2007) Budget estimates 2007–2008: Responses to questions taken on notice from the department of defence; W31 upgrade of the M-113. May. Available at: http://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Committees/Senate_Committees?url=fadt_ctte/estimates/bud_0708/def/index.htm (accessed 9 November 2012).Google Scholar
Thomson, M (2011) Serving Australia: control and administration of the department of defence. ASPI (Australian Strategic Policy Institute) Special Report Issue 41, 26 June. Canberra, ACT, Australia: ASPI.Google Scholar
Weber, E, Khademian, A (2008) Managing collaborative processes: common practices, uncommon circumstances. Administration & Society 40(5): 431464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williamson, OE (1979) Transaction-cost economics: the governance of contractual relations. Journal of Law & Economics 22(2): 233261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wylie, R, Markowski, S (2010) The Australian defence value-adding chain: evolution and experimentation. In: Markowski, S, Hall, P, Wylie, R (eds) Defence Procurement and Industry Policy: A Small Country Perspective. London: Routledge, pp. 187208.Google Scholar