Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-r5zm4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-20T16:47:15.719Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Sociotechnical Interventions and Teams in Australia: 1970s-1990s

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2023

Andrew Griffiths
Andrew Griffiths*
Affiliation:
Centre for Corporate Change, Australian Graduate School of Management, University of New South Wales
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper sets out to highlight some of the major sociotechnical and team interventions in Australia from the seventies through to the nineties. The review notes that teamwork interventions have changed over the last two decades and argues that this may be attributed partly to the popularity and influence of Japanese management approaches during the eighties along with changes to the industrial relations institutions. Team interventions associated with earlier sociotechnical and participant design approaches, undertaken in the seventies, concentrated on changing work and jobs as a way to address quality of work life concerns. In contrast, many Australian organisations which are presently implementing teams are linking them to broader organisational design issues, taking into account product flows, customer and supplier focus, product innovation and support systems. It is noted that later-style team interventions are linked closer to an organisation’s strategic goals.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Economic and Labour Relations Review , Volume 6 , Issue 1 , June 1995 , pp. 73 - 93
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

I would like to thank Dexter Dunphy and John Mathews for comments they made on an earlier version of this paper. This paper was written from research currently being undertaken by myself and Dexter Dunphy at the Centre for Corporate Change examining the rise of an organisational change movement in Australia from 1965–1995.1 would also like to acknowledge the use of research based on the monograph, Self managing teams and changing supervisory roles, by Ben Bryant, Noga Farhy and myself. A version of this paper was presented at the International Colloquium on Organisational Innovation and the Sociotechnical Systems Tradition held in Melbourne 26, 27 May 1995.

References

Anderson, G (1976) ‘The South Australian Initiative’, in Pritchard, R. (ed) Industrial Democracy in Australia, CCH, Australia.Google Scholar
Andreatta, A (1974) ‘Job enrichment through autonomous groups’, Personnel Practice Bulletin Vol 30 (1) March 1974 pp 9–13.Google Scholar
Appelbaum, E., Batt, R. (1994) The New American Workplace: Transforming Work Systems in the United States, ILR Press, Ithaca, New York.Google Scholar
Bryant, B., Farhy, N., Griffiths, A. (1994) Self Managing Teams and Changing Supervisory Roles, Centre for Corporate Change, Australian Graduate School of Management.Google Scholar
Cole, R (1989) Strategies for Learning: Small Group Activities in American, Japanese and Swedish Industry, University of California Press, Berkeley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Committee on Participation (1974) Participation: Various Ways of Involving People in Their Work and Work Organization, Personnel and Industrial Relations Department, Eindhoven.Google Scholar
Crombie, A (1978) Participative Design: An Educational Approach to Industrial Democracy, Canberra Papers in Continuing Education, New Series 4.Google Scholar
Dunphy, D., Ford, G. (1971) ‘The Human Basis of Productivity’, CEDA Occasional Paper No 17 August 1971.Google Scholar
Dunphy, D., Andreatta, H., Timms, L. (1976) ‘Redesigning the work at Philips’, Work and People Vol 2 (1), pp 3–11.Google Scholar
Van Eijnatten, F. (1993) The Paradigm that Changed the Work Place, Van Gorcum Publishers, Assen/ Maastricht.Google Scholar
Emery, F (1974) Futures We’re In, Centre for Continuing Education, ANU.Google Scholar
Emery, M (1974) ‘Participant Design Seminars: A Description’, in Emery, F., Emery, M. (eds) Participant Design: Work and Community Life, Occasional papers in Continuing Education No 4, Centre for Continuing Education, ANU.Google Scholar
Emery, M (1993) Participative Design for Participative Democracy, Centre for Continuing Education, Australian National University, Canberra.Google Scholar
Gibbons, A., McCarroll, G. (1978) ‘Welvic Revisited’, Work and People, Vol 4 (1/2), pp 23–26.Google Scholar
Lazonick, W (1990) Competitive Advantage on the Shop Floor, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
Mathews, J (1991) Ford Australia Plastics Plant: Transition to Teamwork Through Quality Enhancement, UNSW Studies in Organisational Analysis and Innovation, Industrial Relations Research Centre, UNSW.Google Scholar
Mathews, J (1994) Catching the Wave: Workplace Reform in Australia, Alien and Unwin, Sydney.Google Scholar
Mathews, J., Griffiths, A., Watson, N. (1993) Socio-technical Redesign The Case of Cellular Manufacturing at Bendix Mintex, UNSW Studies in Organisational Analysis and Innovation, Industrial Relations Research Centre, UNSW.Google Scholar
Mathews, J., Griffiths, A. (1993) CIG Gas Cylinders: A Decade of Gainsharing Through the Common Interest Model, UNSW Studies in Organisational Analysis and Innovation, Industrial Relations Research Centre, UNSW.Google Scholar
Mealor, T (1992) ICI Australia: The Botany Experience, UNSW Studies in Organisational Analysis and Innovation, Industrial Relations Research Centre, UNSW.Google Scholar
Nicklin, L (1974) ‘Putting Love on the Line’ Sydney Morning Herald Saturday March 9 1 974 p 9.Google Scholar
Peter, H (1976) ‘Work design for Motivation and Productivity’, Administration Development Centre, Department of the Public Service Board, Brisbane.Google Scholar
Philips, (1969) Work-structuring: A Summary of Experiments at Philips 1963 to 1968, Publication of the Personnel and Industrial Relations Division and the Technical Efficiency and Organisation Department, Eindhoven.Google Scholar
Robson, P (1978) “Worker Participation in Australia” Current Affairs Bulletin March pp 22–30.Google Scholar
Schaffer, R., Thomson, H. (1992) ‘Successful Change Programs Begin With Results’, Harvard Business Review, January February, pp 80–89.Google Scholar