Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-c654p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-31T05:47:43.925Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Fruits of Abdication: Australian Multi-employer Award Respondency

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2023

David H. Plowman  and
Malcolm Rimmer
David H. Plowman
Affiliation:
Industrial Relations Research Centre, University of New South Wales
Malcolm Rimmer
Affiliation:
National Key Centre in Industrial Relations, Monash University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper examines the structure of Australian multi-employer awards. It suggests that these awards do not exhibit occupational, industry or representational concentration and thus follow no clear rational principles. The hybrid award system is sub-optimal and can be explained by employer associations’ neglect in the formative period of arbitration. Multi-employer awards are in need of reform if Australia is to become and remain internationally competitive.

Type
Contemporary Issues and Developments
Information
The Economic and Labour Relations Review , Volume 3 , Issue 1 , June 1992 , pp. 153 - 176
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

+

The article is derived from a project sponsored by the BCA and to be published under the title Bargaining Structures, Award Respondency and Employer Associations (IRRC 1992). We acknowledge the support given by the BCA. Any errors of fact or judgement remain the responsibility of the authors.

References

Adams, R. J. (1981) “A Theory of Employer Attitudes and Behaviour Towards Trade Unions in Western Europe and North America”, in Dlugos, G., Weiremuir, K. (eds) Management Under Different Value Systems, de Gruyter, New York.Google Scholar
Clegg, H. (1976) Trade Unionism Under Collective Bargaining, Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
Clegg, H. A. (1979) The Changing System of Industrial Relations in Great Britain, Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
Flanders, A. (1968) “Collective Bargaining: A Theoretical Analysis”, British Journal of Industrial Relations, 6(1).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flanders, A. (1974) “The Tradition of Voluntarism”, British Journal of Industrial Relations, 12(3).Google Scholar
Fox, A. (1967) “The Combination of Masters”, New Society, 9(230), 23 February.Google Scholar
Fox, A. (1975) “Collective Bargaining, Flanders and the Webbs”. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 13(2).Google Scholar
Garran, R., (1958) Prosper the Commonwealth, Angus and Robertson, Sydney.Google Scholar
Ingham, G. K. (1974) Strikes and Industrial Conflict, Macmillan, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phelps Brown, E. H. (1965) The Growth of British Industrial Relations, Macmillan, London.Google Scholar
Plowman, D. H. (1988) “Employer Associations and Bargaining Structures: An Australian Perspective”, British Journal of Industrial Relations, Vol. 26, No. 3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plowman, D. H. (1992) “Industrial Relations and the Legacy of New Protection”, The Journal of Industrial Relations, 34(1).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sisson, K. (1984) “A Comparative Analysis of the Structures of Collective Bargaining”, in Blandy, R., Niland, J. (eds) Alternatives to Arbitration, Allen and Unwin, Sydney.Google Scholar
Sisson, K. (1987) Management Under Collective Bargaining, An International Comparison. Basil Blackwell, London.Google Scholar