Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-g7rbq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-29T20:10:17.284Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Current Crisis Has a Silver Lining

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2023

John Nevile
John Nevile*
Affiliation:
Centre for Applied Economic Research, The University of New South Wales
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Capitalism has had many crises and often they have led to improvements in the way it has operated. Two related improvements are predicted as a result of the current crisis. One is the hastening of the decisive defeat of market liberalism. The other is the rehabilitation of fiscal policy as part of the tool kit used to minimise the inherent instability of capitalist economies. After a brief exposition of the core aspects of market liberalism, this article considers the use of fiscal policy in each of the short run and the long run. Policies around the OECD in the last 16 months have already embodied both these improvements, but a similar achievement in the long run will be more difficult. The crowding-out thesis has more appeal when applied to the longer run. However, the empirical evidence does not support crowding out. More generally, economic orthodoxy relies on neo-classical growth theory to support a belief that longer run trends in real economic variables such as output and employment are determined solely by supply side factors. The article uses the authority of Solow and Swan to emphasise that this is an assumption, not the result of any analysis, and that neoclassical growth theory itself assumes that fluctuations in investment over the business cycle will necessarily affect the path of potential output. Moreover, not only is the NAIRU (Non-Accelerating Inflation Rate of Unemployment) determined by the path of investment in physical and human capital, but at a much lower level of unemployment than the conventional wisdom believes.

Type
Symposium: The Global Financial Crisis
Information
The Economic and Labour Relations Review , Volume 19 , Issue 2 , July 2009 , pp. 27 - 38
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Australian Bureau of Statistics (2009) Australian National Accounts: National Income, Expenditure and Product Dec 2008 (viewed on ABS web site).Google Scholar
Barro, R. J. (1966) ‘Inflation and growth’, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Review, May/June, pp. 153–169.Google Scholar
Blanchard, O. (1997) ‘Is there a core of usable macroeconomics?’, American Economic Review, 87(2), pp. 244–246.Google Scholar
Blinder, A. (1997) ‘Is there a core of practical macroeconomics that we should all believe?’, American Economic Review, 87(2), pp. 240–243.Google Scholar
Eichenbaum, M. (1997) ‘Some thoughts on practical stabililization policy’, American Economic Review, 87(2), pp. 236–239.Google Scholar
Friedman, M. (1962) Capitalism and Freedom, Chicago University Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
Friedman, M., Friedman, R. (1980) Free to Choose: A Personal Statement, Harcourt. Brace Jovanovich, New York.Google Scholar
Friedman, T. (2000) The Lexus and the Olive Tree, Harper Collins, London.Google Scholar
Galbraith, J. (2008) ‘The collapse of monetarism and the irrelevance of the new monetary consensus', Policy Note, 2008/1, The Levy Economics Institute of Bard College.Google Scholar
Goodfriend, M. (2007) ‘How the world achieved consensus on monetary policy’, Journal of Economic Perspectives, Fall, 21 (4), pp. 47–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gupta, S., Clements, B. (2005) ‘Helping countries develop: The role of fiscal policy’, IMF Survey, 24 January.Google Scholar
Hayek, F. A. (1944) The Road to Serfdom, Routledge, London.Google Scholar
Hayek, F. A. (1949) Individualism and Economic Order, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.Google Scholar
Kriesler, P., Lavoie, M. (2007) ‘The new consensus on monetary policy and its post-Keynesian critique’, Review of Political Economy, 19(3), pp. 387–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lerner, A. P. (1943) ‘Functional finance and the federal debt’, Social Research, 10(1), pp. 38–51.Google Scholar
Macfarlane, I., Stevens, G. (1989) ‘Overview: Monetary policy and the economy’, in Macfarlane, I., Stevens, G. (eds) Studies in Money and Credit, Reserve Bank of Australia, Sydney, pp. 1–9.Google Scholar
Nevile, J. W. (1997) ‘Fiscal policy in Australia’ in Kriesler, P. (ed.) The Ausralian Economy, Allen and Unwin, St Leonards.Google Scholar
Nevile, J. W., Kriesler, P. (2008) Decent work for all, with no inflation, paper given at the Centre of Full Employment and Equity Conference at the University of Newcastle, December.Google Scholar
Pressman, S. (1995) ‘Deficits full employment and the use of fiscal policy’, Review of Political Economy, 7(2), pp. 212–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solow, R. (1997) ‘Is there a core of usable macroeconomics we should all believe in?’, American Economic Review, 87(2), pp. 230–232.Google Scholar
Solow, R. (1956) ‘A contribution to the theory of economic growth’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 70, February, pp. 65–94.Google Scholar
Solow, R (2000) ‘The neoclassical theory of growth and distribution’, Banca Nazionale del Lavoro Quarterly Review, December, 215, pp. 358–381.Google Scholar
Swan, T. (1956) ‘Economic growth and capital accumulation’, Economic Record, 32, November pp. 334–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, J. (1997) ‘A core of practical macroeconomics', American Economic Review, 87(2), pp. 233–235.Google Scholar