Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-x5cpj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-28T00:57:19.188Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Labour-Management Relations and New Public Management: The American Experience

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2023

Steven W. Hays
Steven W. Hays*
Affiliation:
Department of Government and International Studies, University of South Carolina, Columbia, USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper provides a broad overview of the role that unions have, and have not — played in the unfolding drama of public management reform in the United States. Factors impeding the ability of unions to shape the reform movement are highlighted. Fragmentation of power and even the absence of rudimentary collective bargaining rights in many locations restrict civil servants’ ability to influence the reform agenda. As a result, New Public Management (NPM) initiatives have progressed in a fashion that often works to the disadvantage of public workers. ‘De-privileging’, privatisation, and devolution of public agencies have become almost ubiquitous. The paper concludes with the observation that NPM offers a golden opportunity, if not the obligation, for management and labour to adopt a more cooperative and participatory approach to policy making in the workplace.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Economic and Labour Relations Review , Volume 13 , Issue 1 , June 2002 , pp. 7 - 35
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Armshaw, Jim; Carnevale, David, Waltuck, Bruce (1993) ‘Union-Management Partnership in the U.S. Department of Labor’, Review of Public Personnel Administration, 13 (Summer): 94–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ban, Carolyn (1995) ‘Unions, Management, and NPR’, in Kettl, Don and Dilulio, J.J. (Eds) Revitalizing State and Local Public Service. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass: 71–103.Google Scholar
Ban, Carolyn, Riccucci, Norma (1994) ‘Civil Service Reform in a Complex Political Environment: New York’, Review of Public Personnel Administration (Spring): 28–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beaumont, Enid (1997) ‘Status of the Devolution Revolution’, The Public Manager, 25 (Winter): 23–26.Google Scholar
Coggburn, Jerrell (2000) ‘Is Deregulation the Answer for Public Personnel Management: A Symposium’, Review of Public Personnel Administration 20 (Fall): 5–69.Google Scholar
Coggburn, Jerrell, Hays, Steven (2002) ‘Human Resources Management Best Practices in Local Government’, Public Administration Quarterly (In Press).Google Scholar
Donahue, John (1989) The Privatization Decision. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Dubnick, Melvin (1994) ‘A Coup Against King Bureaucracy?’, in Dilulio, J. (Ed) Deregulating the Public Service. Washington, D.C.: Brookings: 249–287.Google Scholar
Ewoh, Andrew (1999) ‘An Inquiry Into the Role of Public Employees and Managers in Privatization’, Review of Public Personnel Administration, 19 (Winter): 8–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher, R., Ury, W. (1981) Getting to Yes. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
Gargan, John (1997) ‘Reinventing Government and Reformulating Public Administration’, International Journal of Public Administration, 20 (1): 221–247.Google Scholar
Goldstein, Mark (1992) America’s Hollow Government: How Washington Has Failed the People. Homewood, Illinois: Irwin.Google Scholar
Gore, Al (1993) From Red Tape to Results. Washington, D.C.: Executive Office of the President.Google Scholar
Hays, Steven (1995) ‘Employee Discipline and Removal: Coping With Job Security’, in Hays, Steven and Kearney, Richard (Eds) Public Personnel Administration: Problems and Prospects. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall: 145–161.Google Scholar
Hays, Steven, Kearney, Richard (2001) ‘Anticipated Changes in Human Resource Management: Views from the Field’, Public Administration Review, 61 (September-October): 585–597.Google Scholar
Hays, Steven, Kearney, Richard (1997) ‘Riding the Crest of a Wave: National Performance Review and Public Management Reform’, International Journal of Public Administration, 20 (1): 11–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hays, Steven, Whitney, Shawn (1997) ‘Reinventing the Personnel Function’, American Review of Public Administration, 27 (December): 324–342.Google Scholar
Hood, Christopher (1991) ‘A Public Management for All Seasons?’ Public Administration, 69 (Spring): 3–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hood, Christopher (1990) Beyond the Bureaucratic State: Public Administration in the 1990s. London: School of Economics.Google Scholar
Ingraham, Patricia (1993) ‘Of Pigs in Pokes and Policy Diffusion: Another Look at Pay for Performance’, Public Administration Review, 53 (July-August): 348–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ingraham, Patricia (1992) ‘Commissions, Cycles, and Change: The Role of Blue Ribbon Commissions in Executive Branch Change’, in Ingraham, Patricia and Kettl, Donald (Eds), Agenda for Excellence. Chatham, New Jersey: Chatham House.Google Scholar
Ingraham, Patricia; Thompson, James, Sanders, Ronald (1998) Transforming Government: Lessons from the Reinvention Laboratories. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Kearney, Richard (2001) Labor Relations in the Public Sector. New York: Marcel Dekker.Google Scholar
Kearney, Richard, Hays, Steven (1994) ‘Labor-Management Relations and Participative Decision Making: Toward a New Paradigm’, Public Administration Review, 54 (January-February): 44–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kearney, Richard, Hays, Steven (1988) ‘Reinventing Government, The New Public Management and Civil Service Systems: A Critical Assessment of Dubious Deductions and Hidden Agendas’, Review of Public Personnel Administration, 18 (Fall): 38–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kellough, Edward, Selden, Sally (1997) ‘Pay-for-Performance Systems in State Government: Perceptions of State Agency Personnel Managers’, Review of Public Personnel Administration, 17 (1): 5–21.Google Scholar
Kettl, Donald (2000) ‘The Transformation of Governance: Globalization, Devolution, and the Role of Government’, Public Administration Review, 60 (November-December): 488–497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Key Communications (2001) 2001 Federal Personnel Guide. Washington, D.C.: Key.Google Scholar
Key Communications (2000) 2000 Federal Personnel Guide. Washington, D.C.: Key.Google Scholar
Light, Paul (1999) The True Size of Government. Washington, D.C.: The Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
Martin, Lawrence (1999) ‘Public-Private Competition’, Review of Public Personnel Administration, 19 (Winter): 59–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moe, R. (1994) ‘The Reinventing Government Exercise: Misinterpreting the Problem, Misjudging the Consequences’, Public Administration Review, 54 (March-April): 111–122.Google Scholar
Osborne, David, Gaebler, Ted (1992) Reinventing Government: How the Entrepreneurial Spirit Is Transforming the Public Sector. New York: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Payne v. Western and Atlantic Railroad (1884) 81 Tenn. 519.Google Scholar
Perlez, Jane (1999) ‘Career Diplomat, Yes. But She Shoots from the Hip’, Washington Post (September 26): 26.Google Scholar
Perry, James (1995) ‘Compensation, Merit Pay, and Motivation’, in Hays, Steven and Kearney, Richard (Eds) Public Personnel Administration: Problems and Prospects. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall, 121–132.Google Scholar
Pfiffner, J.P. (1997) ‘The National Performance Review in Perspective’, International Journal of Public Administration, 20:41–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Selden, Sally, Ingraham, Patricia, Jacobson, Willow (2001) ‘Human Resource Practices in State Government: Findings from a National Survey’, Public Administration Review, 61 (September-October): 598–607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, Frank and Radin, Beryl (1997) ‘Reinventing Public Personnel Management: The Winter and Gore Initiatives’, in Ban, Carolyn and Riccucci, Norma (Eds) Public Personnel Management: Current Concerns, Future Challenges. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Tobias, Robert (1998) ‘Federal Employee Unions and the Human Resource Management Function’, in Condrey, Stephen (Ed) Handbook of Human Resources Management in Government. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass: 258–274.Google Scholar
Traywick, Donna (2000) ‘IPMA Excellence Award: Interview With the Winner’, Public Personnel Management, 29 (Summer): 269–275.Google Scholar
United States Bureau of Labor Statistics (2001) Public Employment Trends. Washington, D.C.: Department of Labor.Google Scholar
United States Bureau of Labor Statistics (2000) The Employment Situation. Washington, D.C.: Department of Labor.Google Scholar
United States Census Bureau (1999) Statistical Abstract of the United States. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
United States General Accounting Office (1998) U.S. Postal Service: Little Progress Made in Addressing Labor-Management Problems. Washington, D.C.: Comptroller General.Google Scholar
United State General Accounting Office (1996) Union Activity at the Social Security Administration. Washington, D.C.: Comptroller General.Google Scholar
United States General Accounting Office (1994) Management Reform: Implementation of the NPR Recommendations. Washington, D.C.: Comptroller General.Google Scholar
Wallin, B.A. (1997) ‘The Need for a Privatization Process: Lessons from Development and Implementation’, Public Administration Review, 57 (January-February): 11–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
West, William, Durant, Robert (2000) ‘Merit, Management, and Neutral Competence: Lessons from the U.S. Merit Systems Protection Board’, Public Administration Review, 60 (March-April): 111–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar