Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-5g6vh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T08:49:08.232Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A new tool for rating cognitive behavioural supervision – preliminary findings in a clinical setting

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 March 2020

S.B. Moeller Open the ORCID record for S.B. Moeller [Opens in a new window] ,
N.K. Rosenberg ,
M. Hvenegaard ,
K. Straarup  and
S.F. Austin
S.B. Moeller*
Affiliation:
Mental Health Center North Zealand, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark Psychotherapeutic Research Unit, Mental Health Centre Stolpegaard, Denmark
N.K. Rosenberg
Affiliation:
Mental Health Centre Copenhagen, Capital Region Psychiatry, Denmark
M. Hvenegaard
Affiliation:
Mental Health Centre Copenhagen, Capital Region Psychiatry, Denmark
K. Straarup
Affiliation:
Aarhus University Hospital, Capital Region Psychiatry, Denmark
S.F. Austin
Affiliation:
Mental Health Center North Zealand, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark Psychiatric Research Unit, Region Zealand Psychiatry, Denmark
*
*Corresponding author. Email: Stine.Bjerrum.Moeller@regionh.dk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) is an evidence-based psychotherapy and one of the most widely used treatments for mental health problems. It is generally acknowledged that supervision improves the quality of treatment although systematic descriptions and empirical evaluation of supervision have been sparse. Moreover, there are relatively few valid and reliable instruments to evaluate supervision. Based on a comprehensive review of the supervision literature, six competency domains were identified to cover the scope of CBT supervision: Theory, Focus, Learning strategy, Techniques, Structure, and Interpersonal style. The Moeller, Moerch, Rosenberg Supervision Scale (MMRSS) was developed to evaluate supervisor performance within each of these domains after observation of supervision. The present study examined the psychometric properties of the MMRSS (inter-rater reliability and construct validity), the clinical utility, and satisfaction when using MMRSS to evaluate CBT supervision. CBT supervisors (n = 8) were recruited for the study and provided videos of group supervision. A total of 21 videos were rated using the MMRSS and the Supervisory Competency Scale (SCS) by two independent raters. Supervisees and supervisors completed a satisfaction questionnaire to capture their experience of using the MMRSS during supervision of supervision. The MMRSS showed acceptable internal consistency and validity. Several domains in MMRSS (Structure, Learning strategy, and Interpersonal style) correlated significantly with the corresponding domains in the SCS for cognitive supervision. Preliminary results indicate that the MMRSS may be a valid and clinically useful tool to evaluate CBT supervision, although further systematic evaluation is needed.

Key learning aims

  1. (1) To understand that empirically founded evaluation of cognitive behavioural supervision is essential for good training.

  2. (2) To argue that a modern view of supervision places an emphasis on learning principles.

  3. (3) To describe the Moeller, Moerch, Rosenberg Supervision Scale (MMRSS) and the scale’s preliminary psychometric properties.

  4. (4) To describe the supervisors’ and supervisees’ reported satisfaction using the MMRSS.

Keywords

cognitive behavioural supervisionCBT supervisionevaluationpsychometric propertiessupervision scale
Type
Education and Supervision
Information
the Cognitive Behaviour Therapist , Volume 13 , 2020 , e2
Copyright
© British Association for Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapies 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Further reading

Maruniakova, L., & Rihacek, T. (2018). How beginning cognitive behavioural therapists develop professional confidence. the Cognitive Behaviour Therapist, 11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simpson-Southward, C., Waller, G., & Hardy, G. (2018). Supervisor practice when guiding therapists working with depression: the impact of supervisor and patient characteristics. the Cognitive Behaviour Therapist, 11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

References

Alfonsson, S., Parling, T., Spännargård, Å., Andersson, G., & Lundgren, T. (2018). The effects of clinical supervision on supervisees and patients in cognitive behavioral therapy: a systematic review. Cognitive Behaviour Therapy, 47, 206–228.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Corrie, S., & Lane, D. A. (2015). CBT Supervision. Sage Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hofmann, S. G., Asnaani, A., Vonk, I. J., Sawyer, A. T., & Fang, A. (2012). The efficacy of cognitive behavioral therapy: a review of meta-analyses. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 36, 427–440.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kennerley, H. (2014). The Supervisory Competency Scale. Conference proceedings at the BABCP Conference, Birmingham; 67–68.Google Scholar
Kennerley, H., & Clohessy, S. (2010). Becoming a supervisor, pp. 323–371 in Mueller, M., Kennerley, H., McManus, F., & Westbrook, D., Oxford Guide to Surviving as a CBT Therapist. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milne, D., & James, I. (2000). A systematic review of effective cognitive-behavioural supervision. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 39, 111–127.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Milne, D., James, I., Keegan, D., & Dudley, M. (2002). Teacher’s PETS: a new observational measure of experiential training interactions. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy: An International Journal of Theory & Practice, 9, 187–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milne, D. L., Reiser, R. P., Cliffe, T., & Raine, R. (2011a). SAGE: preliminary evaluation of an instrument for observing competence in CBT supervision. the Cognitive Behaviour Therapist, 4, 123–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milne, D. L., & Reiser, R. P. (2011). Observing competence in CBT supervision: a systematic review of the available instruments. the Cognitive Behaviour Therapist, 4, 89–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milne, D. L., Reiser, R. P., Cliffe, T., Breese, L., Boon, A., Raine, R., & Scarratt, P. (2011b). A qualitative comparison of cognitive-behavioural and evidence-based clinical supervision. the Cognitive Behaviour Therapist, 4, 152–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Møller, S. B., & Rosenberg, N. K. (eds). (2016). Kognitiv adfærdsterapeutisk supervision. København: Hans Reitzels Forlag.Google Scholar
Pilling, S., & Roth, A. D. (2014). The competent clinical supervisor, pp. 20–38 in Watkins, C. E., & Milne, D. L., Clinical Supervision. Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar
Reiser, R. P., Cliffe, T., & Milne, D. L. (2018). An improved competence rating scale for CBT Supervision: Short-SAGE. the Cognitive Behaviour Therapist, 11, 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roth, A. D., & Pilling, S. (2008). Using an evidence-based methodology to identify the competences required to deliver effective cognitive and behavioural therapy for depression and anxiety disorders. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 36, 129–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.