Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-hfldf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-09T04:20:26.339Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Rating and Self-rating of Anxiety

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 August 2018

Robert Kellner
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, University of New Mexico School of Medicine, 2400 Tucker NE, Albuquerque, NM 87131, USA
Eberhard H. Uhlenhuth
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, University of New Mexico School of Medicine, 2400 Tucker NE, Albuquerque, NM 87131, USA

Abstract

The principles of measuring anxiety are reviewed. Scales of anxiety differ in their time focus: state-anxiety scales measure the present or recent past, whereas trait-anxiety scales measure the ways the subject generally feels. Commonly used scales have adequate validity, but there is incomplete agreement on the boundaries of the construct of anxiety. There are consistent differences in sensitivity among anxiety scales, and they vary greatly in the number of items, number of cues and in the method of scoring. For self-rating scales a large number of items with only two cues (e.g. ‘yes’ and ‘no’), or only two scores for each item, increases the sensitivity of the scale for screening as well as for detecting differences between drug and placebo. A large number of cues decreases the sensitivity of a self-rating scale; it is unknown whether a large number of cues is advantageous in group research, but a small number of items is adequate both for rating and self-rating scales.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal College of Psychiatrists 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aitken, R. C. B. (1969) Measurement of feelings using visual analogue scales. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Medicine, 62, 989.Google Scholar
American Psychiatric Association (1987) Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (3rd edn, revised) (DSM–III–R). Washington, DC: APA.Google Scholar
Anastasi, A. (1982) Psychological Testing (5th edn). New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Borkovec, T. D., Weerts, T. C. & Bernstein, D. A. (1977) Assessment of anxiety. In Handbook of Behavioral Assessment (eds Ciminero, A. R., Calhoun, K. S. & Adams, H. E.), pp. 367428. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Cattell, R. B. (1966) Patterns of change: measurement in relation to state-dimension, trait change, lability, and process concepts. In Handbook of Multivariate Experimental Psychology. Chicago: Rand McNally.Google Scholar
Cattell, R. B. & Scheier, I. H. (1958) The nature of anxiety: a review of thirteen multivariate analyses comprising 814 variables. Psychological Reports, 4, 351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clyde, D. J. (1960) Self-ratings. In Drugs and Behavior (eds Uhr, L. & Miller, J. G.). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Conoley, J. C. & Kramer, J. J. (1989) Buros 10th Mental Measurements Yearbooks. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska.Google Scholar
Covi, L. & Lipman, R. S. (1984) Primary depression or primary anxiety? A possible psychometric approach to a diagnostic dilemma. Clinical Neuropharmacology, 7 (suppl. 1 ), S501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cronbach, L. J. (1946) Response sets and test validity. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 6, 475494.Google Scholar
Cronbach, L. J. (1950) Further evidence on response sets and test design. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 10, 331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cronbach, L. J. (1970) Essentials of Psychological Testing (3rd edn). New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Cronbach, L. J. (1971) Test validation. In Educational Measurement (ed. Thorndike, R. L.). Washington, DC: American Council on Education.Google Scholar
Cronbach, L. J. & Meehl, P. E. (1956) Construct validity in psychological tests. In Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol. 1 (eds Fiegl, H. & Scriven, M.), pp. 174204. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Crown, S. & Crisp, A. H. (1966) A short clinical diagnostic self-rating scale for psychoneurotic patients. British Journal of Psychiatry, 112, 917923.Google Scholar
Derogatis, L. R., Lipman, R. S. & Covi, L. (1976) An outpatient psychiatric rating scale: preliminary report. In ECDEU Assessment Manual for Psychopharmacology, Revised, 1976, p. 320. Rockville, MD: US Department of Health, Education, and Welfare.Google Scholar
Falloon, I. R. H., Lindley, P., McDonald, R., et al (1977) Social skills training of outpatient groups: a controlled study of rehearsal and homework. British Journal of Psychiatry, 131, 599.Google Scholar
Falloon, I. R. H., Lloyd, G. G. & Harpin, R. E. (1981) The treatment of social phobia. Journal of Nervous Mental Disease, 169, 180.Google Scholar
Fava, G. A., Kellner, R., Lisansky, J., et al (1986) Rating depression in normals and depressives: observer versus self-rating scales. Journal of Affective Disorders, 11, 2933.Google Scholar
Fisher, S. (1976) Measurement of anxiety in outpatient trials: detection of bias in patient and doctor ratings. Psycho-pharmacological Bulletin, 12, 17.Google Scholar
Gelder, M. G. & Marks, I. M. (1966) Severe agoraphobia: a controlled prospective trial of behaviour therapy. British Journal of Psychiatry, 112, 309.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Glass, R. M., Uhlenhuth, E. H. & Kellner, R. (1987) The value of self-report assessment in studies of anxiety disorders. Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology, 7, 215221.Google Scholar
Goldberg, D. P. (1972) The Detection of Psychiatric Illness by Questionnaire. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Guilford, J. P. (1954) Psychometric Methods (2nd edn). London: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Hamilton, M. A. (1959) The assessment of anxiety states by rating. British Journal of Medical Psychology, 32, 5055.Google Scholar
James, J. E., Hampton, B. A. M. & Larsen, S. A. (1983) The relative efficacy of imaginal and in vivo desensitization in the treatment of agoraphobia. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 14, 203.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kellner, R. (1967a) The assessment of changes in the symptoms of neurotic adults. PhD thesis, University of Liverpool.Google Scholar
Kellner, R. (1967b) The evidence in favour of psychotherapy. British Journal of Medical Psychology, 40, 341358.Google Scholar
Kellner, R. (1971) Improvement criteria in drug trials with neurotic patients. Psychological Medicine, 1, 416425.Google Scholar
Kellner, R. (1986) The brief depression rating scale. In Assessment of Depression (eds Sartorius, N. & Ban, T. A.), pp. 179187. New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Kellner, R. (1987) A symptom questionnaire. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 48, 268274.Google Scholar
Kellner, R. (1988) Anxiety, somatic sensations and bodily complaints. In Handbook of Anxiety, Vol. 2: Classification, Etiological Factors and Associated Disturbances (eds Noyes, R., Roth, M. & Burrows, G. D.), pp. 213237. New York: Elsevier Science.Google Scholar
Kellner, R., Kelly, A. V. & Sheffield, B. F. (1968) The assessment of changes in anxiety in a drug trial. A comparison of methods. British Journal of Psychiatry, 114, 863869.Google Scholar
Kellner, R., Simpson, G. M. & Winslow, W. W. (1972) The relationship of depressive neurosis to anxiety and somatic symptoms. Psychosomatics, 13, 358362.Google Scholar
Kellner, R., & Sheffield, B. F. (1973) A self-rating scale of distress. Psychological Medicine, 3, 88100.Google Scholar
Kellner, R., Sheffield, B. F., & Simpson, G. M. (1978) The value of self-rating scales in drug trials with nonpsychotic patients. Progress in Neuropsychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry, 2, 197205.Google Scholar
Kellner, R., Rada, R. T., Andersen, T., et al (1979) The effects of chlordiazepoxide on self-rated depression, anxiety and well-being. Psychopharmacology, 64, 185191.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kellner, R. & Uhlenhuth, E. H. (1988) The assessment of changes in anxiety in therapeutics. In Handbook of Anxiety, Vol. 2: Classification, Etiological Factors and Associated Disturbances (eds Noyes, R., Roth, M. & Burrows, G. D.), pp. 189211. New York: Elsevier Science.Google Scholar
Knowles, J. B. (1963) Rating methods and measurement of behaviour. In Methods of Psychiatric Research (eds Sainsbury, P. & Kreitman, N.), pp. 7484. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kraus, M. S. (1961) The measurement of transitory anxiety. Psychological Review, 68, 178.Google Scholar
Lacey, J. I. & Lacey, B. C. (1958) Verification and extension of the principle of autonomic response-stereotypy. American Journal of Psychology, 71, 50.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lader, M. & Marks, I. (1971) Clinical Anxiety. New York: Grune & Stratton.Google Scholar
Lehmann, H. E. (1960) The place and purpose of objective methods in psychopharmacology. In Drugs and Behavior (eds Uhr, R. & Miller, J. G.), pp. 107127. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Lipman, R. S., Cole, J. O., Park, L. C., et al (1965) Sensitivity of symptom and nonsymptom-focused criteria of outpatient drug efficacy. American Journal of Psychiatry, 122, 2427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marks, I. M. & Mathews, A. (1978) Case histories and shorter communication: brief standard self-rating for phobic patients. Behavioral Research and Therapy, 17, 263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maser, J. D. & Cloninger, C. R. (1990) Comorbidity of anxiety and mood disorders: introduction and overview. In Comorbidity of Mood and Anxiety Disorders (eds Maser, J. D. & Cloninger, C. R.), pp. 312. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press.Google Scholar
Mavisskalian, M. & Perel, J. (1985) Imipramine in the treatment of agoraphobia: dose-response relationships. American Journal of Psychiatry, 142, 1032.Google Scholar
Mooney, R. L. & Gordon, L. V. (1950) Mooney Problem Check List (1950 revision). New York: Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
Nay, W. R. (1977) Analogue measures. In Handbook of Behavioral Assessment (eds Ciminero, A. R., Calhoun, K. S. & Adams, H. E.). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Noyes, R., Anderson, D. J., Clancy, J., et al (1984) Diazepam and propranolol in panic disorder and agoraphobia. Archives of General Psychiatry, 41, 287.Google Scholar
Sheffield, B. F. & Kellner, R. (1970) The temporal stability of the self-rating of neurotic symptoms. British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 9, 4653.Google Scholar
Spielberger, C. D. (1983) Manual for the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (revised edn). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.Google Scholar
Spielberger, C. D. & Krasner, S. S. (1988) The assessment of state and trait anxiety. In Handbook of Anxiety, Vol. 2: Classification, Etiological Factors and Associated Disturbances (eds Noyes, R., Roth, M. & Burrows, G. D.), pp. 3151. New York: Elsevier Science.Google Scholar
Taylor, J. A. (1953) A personality scale of manifest anxiety. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 48, 285290.Google Scholar
Uhlenhuth, E. H., Glass, R. M., Haberman, S. J., et al (1982) Relative sensitivity of clinical measures in trials of antianxiety agents. In The Behavior of Psychiatric Patients: Quantitative Techniques for Evaluation (eds Burdock, E. I., Sudilovsky, A. & Gershon, S.), pp. 393409. New York: Marcel Dekker.Google Scholar
Waskow, I. E. & Parloff, M. B. (eds) (1975) Psychotherapy Change Measures. Rockville, MD: National Institute of Mental Health.Google Scholar
Wetzel, R. D., Cloninger, C. R. & Guze, S. B. (1982) The assessment of patients with neurosis. In The Behavior of Psychiatric Patients (eds Burdock, E. I., Sudilovsky, A. & Gershon, S.), p. 439. New York: Marcel Dekker.Google Scholar
World Health Organization (1990) International Classification of Diseases (draft 10th edn) (ICD–10). Geneva: WHO.Google Scholar
Zealley, A. K. & Aitken, R. C. B. (1969) Measurement of mood. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Medicine, 62, 993.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zitrin, C. M., Klein, D. F., Woerner, M. G., et al (1983) Treatment of phobias. Archives of General Psychiatry, 40, 125.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.