Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Evaluation of the Two-Way Communication Checklist as a clinical intervention: Results of a multinational, randomised controlled trial

  • Jim Van Os (a1), A. Carlo Altamura (a2), Julio Bobes (a3), Jes Gerlach (a4), Jonathan S. E. Hellewell (a5), Siegfried Kasper (a6), Dieter Naber (a7) and Philippe Robert (a8)...

Abstract

Background

Patients and doctors often have divergent views on care needs.

Aims

To examine whether providing patients with an opportunity to identify and discuss their needs would improve communication and induce changes in care.

Method

Patients with schizophrenia (n=134) were randomly allocated to either standard care or use of the Two-Way Communication Checklist (2-COM). Before seeing their clinician for a routine follow-up, participants in the active intervention group were given 2-COM, a list of 20 common needs, and told to indicate those areas they wanted to discuss with their doctor. Outcomes were assessed immediately and again after 6 weeks.

Results

Using 2-COM induced a stable improvement of patient-reported quality of patient–doctor communication (B=0.33, P=0.031), and induced changes in management immediately after the intervention (OR=3.7, P=0.009; number needed to treat, 6). Treatment change was more likely in patients with more reported needs, and needs most likely to induce treatment change displayed stronger associations with non-medication than with medication changes.

Conclusions

A simple intervention to aid people in discussion of their needs results in improved communication and changes in management.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Evaluation of the Two-Way Communication Checklist as a clinical intervention
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Evaluation of the Two-Way Communication Checklist as a clinical intervention
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Evaluation of the Two-Way Communication Checklist as a clinical intervention
      Available formats
      ×

Copyright

Corresponding author

Professor Dr Jim van Os, Department of Psychiatry and Neuropsychiatry, South Limburg Mental Health Research Network, Maastricht University, PO Box 616 (DRT 10), 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands. Tel: 43 3875443; fax: 43 3875444; e-mail: j.vanos@sp.unimaas.nl

Footnotes

Hide All

Declaration of interest

None. Funding detailed in Acknowledgements.

Footnotes

References

Hide All
American Psychiatric Association (1994) Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (4th edn) (DSM–IV). Washington, DC: APA.
Anthony, W. A. (2000) A recovery-oriented service system: setting some system level standards. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal, 24, 159168.
Deegan, P. E. (1988) Recovery: the lived experience of rehabilitation. Psychosocial Rehabilitation Journal, 11, 1119.
Eisen, S. V., Dickey, B. & Sederer, L. I. (2000) A self-report symptom and problem rating scale to increase inpatients' involvement in treatment. Psychiatric Services, 51, 349353.
Frances, A, Pincus, H. A. & First, M. B. (1994) The Global Assessment of Functioning Scale (GAF). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders – IV. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.
Frese, F. J., Stanley, J., Kress, K., et al (2001) Integrating evidence-based practices and the recovery model. Psychiatric Services, 52, 14621468.
Frith, C. D. (1987) The positive and negative symptoms of schizophrenia reflect impairments in the perception and initiation of action. Psychological Medicine, 17, 631648.
Hansson, L., Vinding, H. R., Mackeprang, T., et al (2001) Comparison of key worker and patient assessment of needs in schizophrenic patients living in the community: a Nordic multicentre study. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 103, 4551.
Holloway, F., Carson, J. & Davis, S. (2002) Rehabilitation in the United Kingdom: research, policy, and practice. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 47, 628634.
Lenert, L. A., Ziegler, J., Lee, T., et al (2000) Differences in health values among patients, family members, and providers for outcomes in schizophrenia. Medical Care, 38, 10111021.
Slade, M., Phelan, M., Thornicroft, G., et al (1996) The Camberwell Assessment of Need (CAN): comparison of assessments by staff and patients of the needs of the severely mentally ill. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 31, 109–13.
Slade, M., Phelan, M. & Thornicroft, G. (1998) A comparison of needs assessed by staff and by an epidemiologically representative sample of patients with psychosis. Psychological Medicine, 28, 543550.
Slade, M., Leese, M., Taylor, R., et al (1999) The association between needs and quality of life in an epidemiologically representative sample of people with psychosis. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 100, 149157.
StataCorp (2002) STATA Statistical Software: Release 8.0. College Station, TX: StataCorp.
van Os, J., Altamura, A. C., Bobes, J., et al (2002) 2-COM: an instrument to facilitate patient–professional communication in routine clinical practice. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 106, 446452.

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed

Evaluation of the Two-Way Communication Checklist as a clinical intervention: Results of a multinational, randomised controlled trial

  • Jim Van Os (a1), A. Carlo Altamura (a2), Julio Bobes (a3), Jes Gerlach (a4), Jonathan S. E. Hellewell (a5), Siegfried Kasper (a6), Dieter Naber (a7) and Philippe Robert (a8)...
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.

×

Reply to: Submit a response


Your details


Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *