Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Comparison of outcomes following after-care from forensic and general adult psychiatric services

  • Jeremy W. Coid (a1), Nicole Hickey (a2) and Min Yang (a3)

Abstract

Background

Forensic psychiatry services are expanding in England and Wales but require support from general services for patient after-care.

Aims

To compare outcomes following community after-care from forensic or general adult psychiatry services.

Method

An observational comparison was made of case management following discharge from medium security in seven pre-reorganisation health regions of England and Wales, by forensic services (n=409) and general adult services (n=652). Criminal convictions, hospital readmissions and deaths were compared over a mean follow-up period of 6.2 years, adjusting for difference in case mix.

Results

Forensic services did not supervise more high-risk patients in the community. Neither service was superior in outcome. More patients managed by general services died from natural causes.

Conclusions

Neither service was superior on measures of subsequent offending or hospitalisation. Specialist forensic after-care conveyed no added benefit. Case management may have been the same in both services.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Comparison of outcomes following after-care from forensic and general adult psychiatric services
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Comparison of outcomes following after-care from forensic and general adult psychiatric services
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Comparison of outcomes following after-care from forensic and general adult psychiatric services
      Available formats
      ×

Copyright

Corresponding author

Professor Jeremy Coid, Forensic Psychiatry Research Unit, St Bartholomew's Hospital, 61 Bartholomew Close, London EC1A 7BE, UK. Tel: +44 (0)20 7601 8138; email: j.w.coid@qmul.ac.uk

Footnotes

Hide All

Declaration of interest

J.W.C. developed a specialist service evaluated in this study.

Footnotes

References

Hide All
American Psychiatric Association (1987) Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (3rd edn, revised) (DSM–III–R). APA.
Burns, T. (2001) To outreach or not to outreach. Journal of Forensic Psychiatry, 12, 1317.
Carter, N., Klein, R. & Day, P. (1992) How Organisations Measure Success: the Use of Key Performance Indicators in Government. Routledge.
Coid, J. & Kahtan, N. (2000) Are special hospitals needed? Journal of Forensic Psychiatry, 11, 1735.
Department of Health (1997) National Service Framework for Mental Health: Modern Standards and Service Models. Department of Health.
Department of Health (1999) Effective Care Co–ordination in Mental Health Services: Modernising the Care Programme Approach. A Policy Booklet. TSO (The Stationery Office).
Friendship, C., McClintock, T., Rutter, S., et al (1999) Re–offending: patients discharged from Regional Secure Unit. Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health, 9, 237253.
Gunn, J. (1977) Management of the mentally abnormal offender: integrated or parallel. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Medicine, 70, 877880.
Home Office & Department of Health and Social Services (1975) Report of the Committee on Mentally Abnormal Offenders (Butler Report). Cmnd 6244. HMSO.
Macculloch, M. J. & Bailey, J. (1991) Issues in the provision and evaluation of forensic services. Journal of Forensic Psychiatry, 2, 247265.
Maden, A., Scott, F., Burnett, R., et al (2004) Offending in psychiatric patients after discharge from medium secure units: prospective national cohort study. BMJ, 328, 1534.
Mohan, R., Slade, M. & Fahy, T. A. (2004) Clinical characteristics of community forensic mental health services. Psychiatric Services, 55, 12941298.
Osborn, D. P. J., Nazareth, I. & King, M. B. (2006) Risk for coronary heart disease in people with severe mental illness: cross–sectional comparative study in primary care. British Journal of Psychiatry, 188, 271277.
Phelan, M., Stradins, L. & Morrison, S. (2001) Physical health of people with severe mental illness. BMJ, 322, 993999.
Rasbash, J., Steele, F. & Browne, W. (2003) A User's Guide to MLwiN, Version 2.0. Centre for Multilevel Modelling, Institute of Education, University of London.
Robertson, G. (1989) Treatment of offender patients: how should success be measured? Medicine, Science and Law, 29, 267276.
Woodward, M. (2004) Epidemiology, Study Design and Data Analysis (2nd edn). Chapman & Hall/CRC.
World Health Organization (1992) The ICD–10 Classification of Mental and Behavioural Disorders: Clinical Descriptions and Diagnostic Guidelines. WHO.

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed

Comparison of outcomes following after-care from forensic and general adult psychiatric services

  • Jeremy W. Coid (a1), Nicole Hickey (a2) and Min Yang (a3)
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.

×

Reply to: Submit a response


Your details


Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *