Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-x4r87 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T18:10:23.927Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Authors' reply

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Nicola Mead
Affiliation:
NIHR School for Primary Care Research, 5th Floor, Williamson Building, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PL, UK. Email: nicki.mead@manchester.ac.uk
Helen Lester
Affiliation:
NIHR School for Primary Care Research, University of Manchester
Carolyn Chew-Graham
Affiliation:
NIHR School for Primary Care Research, University of Manchester
Linda Gask
Affiliation:
NIHR School for Primary Care Research, University of Manchester
Peter Bower
Affiliation:
National Primary Care Research and Development Centre, University of Manchester, UK
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Type
Columns
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 2010 

We thank Dr El-Baalbaki and colleagues for their thoughtful comments on our recent paper. We agree with their cautious interpretation of the results of our meta-analysis.

We were interested in their suggestion that befriending serve as a comparator condition for more structured treatments such as collaborative care, to tease out the specific benefits of the latter over and above the general effects of increased attention and support, and to explore the cost-effectiveness of these complex organisational interventions. Although this makes good sense in design terms, it does, however, relegate befriending to the status of comparator rather than active intervention. The recent Mental Health Foundation report The Lonely Society? (www.mentalhealth.org.uk/campaigns/loneliness-and-mental-health/) highlights the impact of loneliness on health, and its findings are supported by the Royal College of Psychiatrists. 1 We would therefore want to complement Dr El-Baalbaki and colleagues' suggestion with further research specifically exploring the role of befriending as a potential alternative therapeutic intervention for certain groups such as isolated older adults.

Footnotes

Edited by Kiriakos Xenitidis and Colin Campbell

References

1 Royal College of Psychiatrists. RCPsych comments on MHF report ‘The Lonely Society?’ Royal College of Psychiatrists, May 2010 (http://www.rcpsych.ac.uk/press/pressreleases2010/thelonelysociety.aspx).Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.