Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-559fc8cf4f-9dmbd Total loading time: 0.568 Render date: 2021-03-03T09:12:24.344Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": false, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true }

Anterior cingulate grey-matter deficits and cannabis use in first-episode schizophrenia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Philip R. Szeszko
Affiliation:
Zucker Hillside Hospital, Department of Psychiatry Research, Glen Oaks and Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, and Feinstein Institute for Medical Research, Manhasset, New York, USA
Delbert G. Robinson
Affiliation:
Zucker Hillside Hospital, Department of Psychiatry Research, Glen Oaks and Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, and Feinstein Institute for Medical Research, Manhasset, New York, USA
Serge Sevy
Affiliation:
Zucker Hillside Hospital, Department of Psychiatry Research, Glen Oaks and Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, and Feinstein Institute for Medical Research, Manhasset, New York, USA
Sanjiv Kumra
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, University of Minnesota, Mineapolis, Minnesota, USA
Claudia I. Rupp
Affiliation:
Innsbruck Medical University, Department of Psychiatry, Innsbruck, Austria
Julia D. Betensky
Affiliation:
Zucker Hillside Hospital, Department of Psychiatry Research, Glen Oaks, New York, USA
Todd Lencz
Affiliation:
Zucker Hillside Hospital, Department of Psychiatry Research, Glen Oaks, and Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, and Feinstein Institute for Medical Research, Manhasset, New York, USA
Manzar Ashtari
Affiliation:
Zucker Hillside Hospital, Department of Psychiatry Research, Glen Oaks, New York, USA
John M. Kane
Affiliation:
Zucker Hillside Hospital, Department of Psychiatry Research, Glen Oaks, and Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, and Feinstein Institute for Medical Research, Manhasset, New York
Anil K. Malhotra
Affiliation:
Zucker Hillside Hospital, Department of Psychiatry Research, Glen Oaks, and Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, and Feinstein Institute for Medical Research, Manhasset, New York
Handan Gunduz-Bruce
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
Barbara Napolitano
Affiliation:
Zucker Hillside Hospital, Department of Psychiatry Research, Glen Oaks and Feinstein Institute for Medical Research, Manhasset, New York
Robert M. Bilder
Affiliation:
UCLA Neuropsychiatric Institute and Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California, USA
Corresponding
E-mail address:
Rights & Permissions[Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Background

Despite the high prevalence of cannabis use in schizophrenia, few studies have examined the potential relationship between cannabis exposure and brain structural abnormalities in schizophrenia.

Aims

To investigate prefrontal grey and white matter regions in patients experiencing a first episode of schizophrenia with an additional diagnosis of cannabis use or dependence (n=20) compared with similar patients with no cannabis use (n=31) and healthy volunteers (n=56).

Method

Volumes of the superior frontal gyrus, anterior cingulate gyrus and orbital frontal lobe were outlined manually from contiguous magnetic resonance images and automatically segmented into grey and white matter.

Results

Patients who used cannabis had less anterior cingulate grey matter compared with both patients who did not use cannabis and healthy volunteers.

Conclusions

A defect in the anterior cingulate is associated with a history of cannabis use among patients experiencing a first episode of schizophrenia and could have a role in poor decision-making and in choosing more risky outcomes.

Type
Papers
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 2007 

The prevalence of cannabis use in schizophrenia can range up to 43% (Reference Bersani, Orlandi and KotzalidisBersani et al, 2002) and poses unique treatment challenges (Reference Green, Kavanagh and YoungGreen et al, 2004). The use of cannabis in schizophrenia tends to be associated with earlier age at first psychotic episode, especially among male patients (Reference Van Mastrigt, Addington and AddingtonVan Mastrigt et al, 2004), and is associated with an unfavourable outcome (Reference Henquet, Murray and LinszenHenquet et al, 2005). Although numerous studies have identified frontal brain structural abnormalities in schizophrenia (Reference Goldstein, Goodman and SeidmanGoldstein et al, 1999; Reference Gur, Cowell and LatshawGur et al, 2000), little research has been directed at understanding the potential association between these abnormalities and cannabis use. Animal studies suggest that using Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol, the main psychoactive component of cannabis, may be neurotoxic to the frontal lobes (Reference Verrico, Jentsch and RothVerrico et al, 2003), which are believed to have a key role in the neurobiology of schizophrenia (Reference Goldman-Rakic and SelemonGoldman-Rakic & Selemon, 1997). In this study we investigated three prefrontal cortical regions (the superior frontal gyrus, anterior cingulate gyrus and orbital frontal lobe) implicated in drug addiction (Reference Goldstein and VolkowGoldstein & Volkow, 2002; Reference Tucker, Potenza and BeauvaisTucker et al, 2004), in a sample of patients with a first episode of schizophrenia with or without a history of cannabis use compared with healthy volunteers. We tested the hypothesis that patients with the dual diagnosis would have greater prefrontal structural abnormalities compared with patients who did not use cannabis and with healthy volunteers.

METHOD

The 51 patients included in this study were recruited from admissions to the in-patient service at the Zucker Hillside Hospital in Glen Oaks, New York, and were participating in clinical trials comparing the efficacy of atypical antipsychotic drugs. All patients were interviewed using the Structured Clinical Interview for Axis I DSM–IV Disorders (SCID; Reference First, Spitzer and GibbonFirst et al, 1994) and met DSM–IV criteria (American Psychiatric Association, 1994) for schizophrenia (n=36), schizo-affective disorder (n=8) or schizophreniform disorder (n=7). Of the 51 patients with schizophrenia included in this study, 8 had a diagnosis of cannabis abuse and 12 had a diagnosis of cannabis dependence. Of the 20 patients with a diagnosis of either cannabis abuse or dependence, 6 had a diagnosis of alcohol abuse (n=5) or dependence (n=1). Among the 6 patients who had a diagnosis of alcohol abuse or dependence, other substance use diagnoses included cocaine abuse (n=1), hallucinogen abuse (n=1) and opioid dependence (n=1). None of the 14 patients with a diagnosis of cannabis abuse or dependence had any other substance use diagnosis. Only 2 of the 31 patients without a diagnosis of cannabis abuse or dependence had any other substance use diagnosis (1 with alcohol abuse and 1 with alcohol dependence). Twenty-five patients were antipsychotic drug-naïve at the time of the scan, including 6 patients from the group with cannabis use and 19 patients from the group without cannabis use. The median duration of antipsychotic drug exposure from entry into the clinical trial and the magnetic resonance imaging examination was 0 weeks (range 0–34 weeks).

Fifty-six healthy volunteers were recruited from local newspaper advertisements and through word of mouth in the community and denied any history of psychiatric or medical illness as determined by clinical interview and the non-patient version of the SCID (SCID–NP; Reference Spitzer and WilliamsSpitzer & Williams, 1988). Thus, no one in the healthy comparison group had a substance use diagnosis. Exclusion criteria for all study participants included serious neurological or endocrine disorder, any medical condition or treatment known to affect the brain, and meeting DSM–IV criteria for mental retardation. All procedures were approved by the local institutional review board and written informed consent was obtained from all participants.

Classification of handedness was based on a modified version of the Edinburgh Inventory consisting of 20 items (Reference OldfieldOldfield, 1971). Participants with a laterality quotient greater than 0.70 were classified as dextral and the rest as non-dextral (Reference Schachter, Ransil and GeschwindSchachter et al, 1987). Handedness for 3 patients without cannabis use and 9 healthy volunteers was assessed solely on the basis of handwriting preference.

Imaging procedures

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans were conducted at Long Island Jewish Medical Center and were acquired in the coronal plane using three-dimensional fast spoiled gradient recalled acquisition witih inversion recovery (time to repetition) 12.7 ms or 14.7 ms, echotime 4.5 ms or 5.5 ms, field of view 22 cm) on a 1.5 T whole-body superconducting imaging system (General Electric, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA). This sequence produced 124 contiguous images (slice thickness 1.5 mm) through the whole head with in-plane resolution of 0.86 mm × 0.86 mm in a 256 × 256 matrix.

Measurement procedures

All measurements were completed in MEDx (Sensor Systems, Sterling, Virginia, USA). The images were aligned along the anterior and posterior commissures for standardisation across individuals and flipped randomly in the right–left axis. Scans were mixed together randomly and no identifying information was available to the operator from the scan. All measurements were thus completed by an operator who was masked to group membership and hemisphere.

Total intracranial contents

Measurement of total intracranial contents was completed in MEDx by computing the volume of the total cerebrum, cerebrospinal fluid, cerebellum and brainstem. Interrater reliability between two raters as assessed by intraclass correlations in nine cases was 0.99.

Frontal lobe subregions

Measurement of the frontal lobe subregions was completed using methods described previously (Reference Szeszko, Bilder and LenczSzeszko et al, 1999), which were adapted from Rademacher et al (Reference Rademacher, Galaburda and Kennedy1992) for use in our magnetic resonance images. This method has been used in our previous work (Szeszko et al, Reference Szeszko, Bilder and Lencz2000, Reference Szeszko, Macmillan and McMeniman2004) and utilises the cerebral sulci in combination with a set of coronal planes that close the selected regions of interest. The boundaries of the superior frontal gyrus were the tip of the cingulate sulcus (anterior), the connection of the superior and precentral sulci (posterior), the superior frontal sulcus (lateral) and the cingulate sulcus (medial). The boundaries of the anterior cingulate gyrus were the tip of the cingulate sulcus (anterior), the connection of the superior and precentral sulci (posterior), the callosal sulcus (ventral) and the cingulate sulcus (dorsal). The boundaries of the orbital frontal region were the last appearance of the anterior horizontal ramus (anterior), the last appearance of the olfactory sulcus (posterior), the anterior horizontal ramus/circular sulcus of insula (lateral) and the olfactory sulcus (medial) (Fig. 1). Because one of the limiting sulci required for measurement of the orbital frontal region (the anterior horizontal ramus) was not present in every hemisphere (Reference Ono, Kubik and AbernathyOno et al, 1990; Reference Szeszko, Bilder and LenczSzeszko et al, 1999), orbital frontal volumes could not be computed for some individuals (see Table 2).

Fig. 1 Sulcal anatomy and coronal planes used for measuremenet of the frontal subregions. A, cingulate sulcus (grey), callosal sulcus (white) and tip of the cingulate sulcus (black, dashed); B, superior frontal sulcus (white), precentral sulcus (grey) and the connection between the two (black, dashed); C, anterior horizontal ramus (white) and its anterior tip (black, dashed); D, olfactory sulcus (white) and its posterior tip (black, dashed).

All regions were outlined manually in the coronal plane on a slice-by-slice basis and included both grey and white matter (Fig. 2). After outlining the frontal region of interest, the operator automatically segmented it into grey and white matter using a thresholding method generated from histograms (Reference OtsuOtsu, 1979), as described previously (Reference Lim, Zipursky and WattsLim et al, 1992; Reference Szeszko, Macmillan and McMenimanSzeszko et al, 2004). Intraclass correlations between two or three operators for these brain structures (number of cases 8–10) were as follows: anterior cingulate gyrus grey matter, right hemisphere, ICC=0.90, left hemisphere, ICC=0.94; anterior cingulate gyrus white matter, right, ICC=0.94, left, ICC=0.94; superior frontal gyrus grey matter, right, ICC=0.92, left, ICC=0.97; superior frontal gyrus white matter, right, ICC=0.95, left, ICC=0.95; orbital frontal lobe grey matter, right, ICC=0.92, left, ICC=0.99; orbital frontal lobe white matter, right, ICC=0.94, 0.94, left, ICC=0.90.

Fig. 2 Frontal lobe subregions (superior frontal gyrus, white; anterior cingulate gyrus, black, dashed; orbital frontal lobe, grey). Outlined regions were automatically segmented into grey and white matter using a thresholding method generated from grey-level histograms (see text and Reference OtsuOtsu, 1979 for details).

Statistical procedures

The mixed-models approach (SAS version 8.2 for Windows) for repeated-measures analysis of variance was used to compare brain structure volumes between patients and healthy volunteers. Analyses were conducted separately for the anterior cingulate, superior frontal gyrus and orbital frontal lobe because of their neuroanatomical heterogeneity. For each of the three frontal regions the statistical model included group (healthy volunteers v. patients with cannabis use v. patients without cannabis use) and gender as between-subject factors. Tissue type (grey v. white) and hemisphere were repeated measures. Age was included as a covariate because the groups differed in age and because age correlated with the brain structure volumes. Intracranial volume was included as a covariate to control for non-specific differences in brain size among individuals. Subsequent analyses excluded any patient with a substance use diagnosis other than cannabis abuse or dependence. Group differences in demographic variables were examined using independent group t-tests. Chi-square tests were used to examine differences in categorical variables. Analyses of frontal brain structure volumes were conducted using two-tailed tests with α=0.017 (0.05 divided by number of brain regions). Results of analyses for individual brain structure volumes are presented for descriptive purposes only (see Table 2).

RESULTS

Sample characteristics for the two patient groups and the healthy comparison group are given in Table 1. The three groups did not differ significantly from each other in distributions of age, gender, handedness or the absence of the right or left anterior horizontal ramus (P>0.05). Also, as expected, the groups differed in education (F=6.64, d.f.=2,97, P=0.002), with healthy volunteers having more education than either patient group. Patients with cannabis use did not differ significantly from patients without cannabis use in distributions of age at first psychotic symptoms, years of education, duration of antipsychotic treatment, duration of untreated psychosis or global assessment of functioning (all P>0.05; Table 1). There were, however, significantly more patients who were antipsychotic drug-naïve among the cannabis user group compared with the non-cannabis user group (χ2=4.76, d.f.=1, P=0.029).

Table 1 Sample characteristics

Healthy comparison group (n=56) Schizophrenia group
No cannabis use (n=31) Cannabis use (n=20)
Gender, n
   Male 36 25 17
   Female 20 6 3
Age, years: mean (s.d.) 25.7 (6.7) 24.8 (4.9) 22.4 (3.6)
Handedness, n 1
   Dextral 42 23 15
   Non-dextral 12 8 5
Education, years: mean (s.d.) 2 14.6 (2.6) 13.2 (1.8) 12.6 (1.9)
Age at first psychotic symptoms, years: mean (s.d.) 21.4 (4.6) 20.3 (4.2)
Antipsychotic treatment, weeks: mean (range) 3.1 (0–26.7) 5.2 (0–34.4)
Antipsychotic drug-naïve, n 19 6
Duration of untreated psychosis, weeks: mean (range) 169 (1–828) 87 (4–380)
Global Assessment of Functioning score: mean (s.d.) 33.1 (13.4) 31.0 (16.6)

1. Missing data from healthy group (n=2)

2. Missing data from healthy group (n=7)

Mean brain structure volumes for the three study groups are given in Table 2, along with the adjusted 95% confidence intervals for the difference between group means. The main finding that distinguished the groups was a significant group-by-tissue type interaction for the anterior cingulate (F 2,108=6.39, P=0.002). Follow-up tests revealed that patients who used cannabis had significantly less anterior cingulate grey matter compared with patients who did not (t 1,108=–2.41, P=0.018) and with healthy volunteers (t 1,108=–2.19, P=0.031). Repeating the analysis with antipsychotic drug-naïve status as a covariate revealed that patients who used cannabis had significantly less anterior cingulate grey matter compared with patients who did not (t 1,48=–2.40, P=0.020). Individual data points illustrating total anterior cingulate grey-matter volumes for the three groups are provided in Fig. 3. None of the interactions involving gender was statistically significant for the anterior cingulate. Neither the main effect of group nor group-by-tissue type interaction was statistically significant for the orbital frontal lobe (all P>0.05). In addition, the main effect of group was not statistically significant for the superior frontal gyrus.

Table 2 Unadjusted frontal lobe volumes and adjusted confidence intervals for group differences

Frontal lobe volume, cm3 Adjusted confidence intervals of difference between groups 1
Healthy control group (n=56) Mean (s.d.) Schizophrenia group Control – FESZ without cannabis use Control – FESZ with cannabis use FESZ without cannabis use – FESZ with cannabis use
No cannabis use (n=31) Mean (s.d.) Cannabis use (n=20) Mean (s.d.) 95% CI ES 95% CI ES 95% CI ES
Superior frontal gyrus
   Grey matter total 33.3 (5.51) 32.9 (6.26) 32.7 (5.10) –1.35 to 3.06 0.007 –0.25 to 4.35 0.042 –2.19 to 3.41 0.004
   White matter total 25.4 (4.81) 25.4 (5.52) 25.7 (3.90) –1.65 to 1.96 0.000 –2.66 to 1.49 0.004 –3.10 to 1.27 0.015
   Right hemisphere
      Grey matter 16.8 (2.89) 16.0 (3.22) 16.5 (2.95) –0.18 to 2.21 0.033 –0.39 to 2.21 0.027 –1.98 to 1.23 0.005
      White matter 12.8 (2.42) 12.4 (2.81) 13.0 (2.34) –0.46 to 1.39 0.012 –1.50 to 0.73 0.007 –2.16 to 0.31 0.046
   Left Hemisphere
      Grey matter 16.7 (2.61) 17.0 (3.51) 16.2 (2.82) –1.16 to 1.10 0.000 0.03 to 2.36 0.055 * –0.62 to 2.59 0.031
      White matter 12.7 (2.36) 12.9 (3.01) 12.7 (2.13) –1.07 to 0.77 0.001 –1.13 to 0.87 0.001 –1.25 to 1.28 0.000
Anterior cingulate gyrus
   Grey matter total 8.28 (1.55) 8.46 (1.54) 7.35 (1.46) –0.75 to 0.53 0.001 0.31 to 1.80 0.100 ** 0.26 to 1.91 0.130 *
   White matter total 4.38 (0.94) 4.34 (0.88) 4.05 (0.96) –0.29 to 0.38 0.001 –0.20 to 0.64 0.015 –0.26 to 0.69 0.018
   Right hemisphere
      Grey matter 4.39 (1.01) 4.50 (1.09) 4.11 (1.19) –0.50 to 0.36 0.001 –0.17 to 0.89 0.025 –0.22 to 0.98 0.034
      White matter 2.28 (0.58) 2.28 (0.63) 2.24 (0.76) –0.23 to 0.24 0.000 –0.32 to 0.28 0.000 –0.37 to 0.35 0.000
   Left hemisphere
      Grey matter 3.89 (1.00) 3.96 (1.02) 3.24 (0.89) –0.49 to 0.40 0.000 0.19 to 1.20 0.093 ** 0.11 to 1.30 0.109 *
      White matter 2.10 (0.60) 2.06 (0.55) 1.81 (0.42) –0.20 to 0.29 0.002 –0.04 to 0.51 0.039 –0.07 to 0.52 0.048
Orbital frontal
   Grey matter total 10.1 (2.22) 10.8 (2.35) 10.5 (2.64) –1.56 to 0.35 0.022 –1.02 to 1.23 0.001 –0.65 to 2.15 0.029
   White matter total 6.37 (1.53) 6.87 (1.57) 6.79 (2.00) –0.96 to 0.20 0.023 –1.08 to 0.46 0.011 –0.77 to 1.11 0.004
   Right hemisphere 2
      Grey matter 4.84 (1.19) 5.11 (1.39) 5.03 (1.52) –0.75 to 0.34 0.007 –0.44 to 0.79 0.005 –0.34 to 1.33 0.034
      White matter 3.03 (0.84) 3.24 (0.90) 3.17 (1.11) –0.50 to 0.21 0.009 –0.45 to 0.43 0.000 –0.29 to 0.80 0.021
   Left hemisphere 3
      Grey matter 5.28 (1.41) 5.70 (1.25) 5.36 (1.48) –0.88 to 0.29 0.014 –0.60 to 0.80 0.001 –0.34 to 1.05 0.024
      White matter 3.36 (0.99) 3.60 (0.87) 3.51 (1.08) –0.56 to 0.18 0.013 –0.67 to 0.28 0.010 –0.49 to 0.47 0.000

ES, effect size; FESZ, first-episode schizophrenia

1. Volumes adjusted for age and total intracranial contents

2. Owing to the absence of the anterior horizontal ramus volumes could not be computed for 5 healthy volunteers, 4 patients without cannabis use and 2 patients with cannabis use

3. Owing to the absence of the anterior horizontal ramus volumes could not be computed for 6 healthy volunteers, 2 patients with schizophrenia without cannabis use and 1 patient with schizophrenia with cannabis use

* P < 0.05

** P < 0.01

Fig. 3 Scatterplot of total anterior cingulate gyrus grey-matter volumes (horizontal lines represent mean values).

There also was a significant main effect of hemisphere for the anterior cingulate (F 1,110=19.3, P<0.001) and orbital frontal lobe (F 1,94=16.1, P<0.001). Overall, participants had more grey matter (t 1,110=–4.78, P<0.001) and white matter (t 1,110=–3.33, P=0.001) in the right anterior cingulate compared with the left anterior cingulate. In addition, participants had more grey matter (t 1,94=3.80, P<0.001) and white matter (t 1,94=4.07, P<0.001) in the left compared with the right orbital frontal lobe. No significant hemispheric asymmetry was evident in the sample for either superior frontal gyrus grey-matter or white-matter volumes (P>0.05).

Subsequent analyses investigated whether having other substance use diagnoses influenced the observed findings. The group-by-tissue type interaction remained statistically significant (F 2,100=6.07, P=0.003) for the anterior cingulate when we excluded patients from analysis who had any substance use diagnosis other than cannabis abuse or dependence. Specifically, patients with either cannabis abuse or dependence as their sole substance use diagnosis had significantly less anterior cingulate grey matter than patients without any substance use diagnosis (t 1,100=–2.45, P<0.016) and healthy volunteers (t 1,100=–2.34, P=0.021).

DISCUSSION

Understanding the relationship between prefrontal grey matter and cannabis use in schizophrenia may have important implications for improving our understanding of the potentially deleterious effects of these substances on brain structure in this disorder. Using methods for cortical parcellation of the prefrontal cortex based on the sulcal anatomy, we report that patients experiencing a first episode of schizophrenia who have a history of cannabis use have less anterior cingulate grey matter compared with similar patients who do not use cannabis and with healthy volunteers. We obtained similar findings when we excluded patients with substance use diagnoses other than cannabis abuse or dependence from analysis.

Other studies

Little research has been directed at understanding the relationship between cannabis use and brain structure, especially in schizophrenia, and thus it is difficult to compare our findings with prior work. In a structural neuroimaging study Cahn et al (Reference Cahn, Hulshoff Pol and Caspers2004) did not identify differences in total grey- and white-matter volumes between patients with recent-onset schizophrenia comorbid with cannabis abuse or dependence and patients with no cannabis use, but did not examine discrete frontal cortical regions. Several studies reported grey-matter structural alterations in cannabis users, however, and this may have relevance for the findings reported here. For example, Matochik et al (Reference Matochik, Eldreth and Cadet2005) reported that individuals who used cannabis had lower grey-matter density in the right parahippocampal gyrus and greater density bilaterally near the precentral gyrus and right thalamus compared with those who did not. In addition, Wilson et al (Reference Wilson, Mathew and Turkington2000) reported lower whole-brain grey-matter volume among individuals who started using cannabis before age 17 years compared with individuals who started using cannabis later. Moreover, the use of other illicit substances such as cocaine has been linked to anterior cingulate grey-matter structural alterations (Reference Franklin, Acton and MaldjianFranklin et al, 2002; Reference Matochik, London and EldrethMatochik et al, 2003).

The anterior cingulate is believed to play an important part in mediating executive functions, including set-shifting and response inhibition, which have been reported to be abnormal among individuals who use cannabis (Reference Gruber and Yurgelun-ToddGruber & Yurgelun-Todd, 2005). Several studies reported aberrant anterior cingulate activity among cannabis users while performing the Stroop task, which requires the ability to inhibit prepotent tendencies to respond (Reference Eldreth, Matochik and CadetEldreth et al, 2004; Reference Gruber and Yurgelun-ToddGruber & Yurgelun-Todd, 2005). It is also noteworthy that abnormal anterior cingulate activity was also reported in cannabis users while performing a motor sequencing task (Reference Pillay, Rogowska and KanayamaPillay et al, 2004) and in individuals exposed to marijuana prenatally (Reference Smith, Fried and HoganSmith et al, 2004). People who are substance users also find it difficult to inhibit their own actions as working memory demands increase (Reference Hester and GaravanHester & Garavan, 2004), and individuals who use cannabis may need the anterior cingulate to ‘work harder’ to complete task demands (Reference Kanayama, Rogowska and PopeKanayama et al, 2004). Drug craving has also been linked with anterior cingulate activity (Reference Kilts, Schweitzer and QuinnKilts et al, 2001) and more specifically with attentional biases for cannabis-related stimuli (Reference Field, Mogg and BradleyField et al, 2004).

Implications

Risky decision-making is considered integral to the phenomenology of drug use (Reference Fishbein, Eldreth and HydeFishbein et al, 2005) and such decisions are intimately linked with reward and punishment, which is mediated by neural systems involving the anterior cingulate (Reference Shidara and RichmondShidara & Richmond, 2002). Patients with schizophrenia who use cannabis may have deficits in the ability to balance rewards and punishments, which could contribute to drug-taking behaviour. Specifically, people who use cannabis tend to make decisions based on large immediate gains in spite of more costly losses (Reference Whitlow, Liguori and LivengoodWhitlow et al, 2004). Among drug users, risky choices during a decision-making test were associated with abnormal metabolic activity in the anterior cingulate (Reference Tucker, Potenza and BeauvaisTucker et al, 2004), which may partly form the neuroanatomical, substrate of choosing risky outcomes. Our results are compatible with the hypothesis that grey-matter structural alterations involving the anterior cingulate in patients with schizophrenia using cannabis could be associated with poor decision-making and partly mediate the compulsive drive towards drug use (Reference AdinoffAdinoff, 2004).

We did not observe significant differences between the group with first-episode schizophrenia with no history of cannabis use and the healthy volunteer group in any of the prefrontal grey-matter or white-matter volumes. One potentially important consideration in the assessment of brain structure in schizophrenia, however, is illness duration, especially given some evidence that grey-matter deficits in schizophrenia are progressive (Reference Mathalon, Sullivan and LimMathalon et al, 2001; Reference Cahn, Hulshoff Pol and BongersCahn et al, 2002; Reference Pantelis, Velakoulis and McGorryPantelis et al, 2003) and that such deficits occur only after the first few years following illness onset (Reference Molina, Sanz and SarrameaMolina et al, 2004). It is therefore conceivable that prefrontal grey-matter structural alterations might become apparent later in the course of schizophrenia, at least in our cohort of patients without cannabis use. In addition, it would be helpful to elucidate the potential effects of cannabis on the anterior cingulate in longitudinal studies, especially given that this region has been implicated in the transition to psychosis (Reference Pantelis, Velakoulis and McGorryPantelis et al, 2003).

Limitations

There were several limitations to our study that should be acknowledged. One potential limitation is the extensive amount of time required to outline the frontal lobe regions of interest. An alternative approach might be the use of voxel-based morphometry, although this method requires brain normalisation and smoothing, which could result in the loss of information if abnormalities are subtle and localised to small regions. Also, there are inherent challenges in using sulcal anatomical features as the boundaries of regions of interest, given their heterogeneous presentation; however, we believe that this approach provides greater cytoarchitectonic validity compared with methods based on invariant landmarks not appearing on the cortical surface. In addition, qualitative methods for mapping cingulate and paracingulate morphology (Reference Yucel, Pantelis and StuartYucel et al, 2002) may be useful in complementing the volumetric approach described here. Another potential limitation is the lack of a study group who used cannabis but did not have schizophrenia, to test whether our findings were more generally associated with cannabis use. Moreover, given the cross-sectional nature of this study, we could not determine whether anterior cingulate grey-matter volume deficits predispose patients to use cannabis or whether these deficits are a consequence of cannabis use.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported in part by grants from NARSAD (P.R.S.) and the National Institute of Mental Health to P.R.S. (MH01990), R.M.B. (MH60374), S.S. (DA015541), J.M.K. (MH60575), D.G.R. (MH60004) and the North Shore–Long Island Jewish Research Institute General Clinical Research Center (M01 RR018535).

Footnotes

Declaration of interest

None. Funding detailed in Acknowledgements.

References

American Psychiatric Association (1994) Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (4th edn) (DSM-IV). APA.Google Scholar
Adinoff, B. (2004) Neurobiologic processes in drug reward and addiction. Harvard Review of Psychiatry, 12, 305320.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bersani, G., Orlandi, V., Kotzalidis, G. D., et al (2002) Cannabis and schizophrenia: impact on onset, course, psychopathology and outcomes. European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinincal Neurosciences, 252, 8692.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cahn, W., Hulshoff Pol, H. E., Bongers, M., et al (2002) Brain morphology in antipsychotic-naïve schizophrenia: a study of multiple brain structures. British Journal of Psychiatry, 181 (suppl. 43), s66s72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cahn, W., Hulshoff Pol, H. E., Caspers, E., et al (2004) Cannabis and brain morphology in recent-onset schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Research, 67, 305307.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eldreth, D. A., Matochik, J. A., Cadet, J. L., et al (2004) Abnormal brain activity in prefrontal brain regions in abstinent marijuana users. Neurolmage, 23, 914920.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Field, M., Mogg, K. & Bradley, B. P. (2004) Cognitive bias and drug craving in recreational cannabis users. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 74, 105111.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
First, M. B., Spitzer, R. L., Gibbon, M., et al (1994) Structured Clinical Interview for Axis I DSM–IV Disorders– Patient Edition (SCID–I/P) Biometrics Research Department, New York State Psychiatric Institute.Google Scholar
Fishbein, D. H., Eldreth, D. L., Hyde, C., et al (2005) Risky decision making and the anterior cingulate cortex in abstinent drug abusers and nonusers. Brain Research. Cognitive Brain Research, 23, 119136.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Franklin, T. R., Acton, P. D., Maldjian, J. A., et al (2002) Decreased gray matter concentration in the insular, orbitofrontal, cingulate, and temporal cortices of cocaine patients. Biological Psychiatry, 51, 134142.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goldman-Rakic, P. S. & Selemon, L. D. (1997) Functional and anatomical aspects of prefrontal pathology in schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 23, 437458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldstein, J. M., Goodman, J. M., Seidman, L. J., et al (1999) Cortical abnormalities in schizophrenia identified by structural magnetic resonance imaging. Archives of General Psychiatry. 56, 537547 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goldstein, R. Z. & Volkow, N. D. (2002) Drug addiction and its underlying neurobiological basis: neuroimaging evidence for the involvement of the frontal cortex. American Journal of Psychiatry, 159, 16421652.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Green, B., Kavanagh, D. J. & Young, R. M. (2004) Reasons for cannabis use in men with and without psychosis. Drug and Alcohol Review, 23, 445453.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gruber, S. A. & Yurgelun-Todd, D. A. (2005) Neuroimaging of marijuana smokers during inhibitory processing: a pilot investigation. Brain Research. Cognitive Brain Research, 23, 107118.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gur, R. E., Cowell, P. E., Latshaw, A., et al (2000) Reduced dorsal and orbital prefrontal gray matter volumes in schizophrenia. Archives of General Psychiatry. 57, 761768.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henquet, C., Murray, R., Linszen, D., et al (2005) The environment and schizophrenia: the role of cannabis use. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 31, 608612.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hester, R. & Garavan, H. (2004) Executive dysfunction in cocaine addiction: evidence for discordant frontal, cingulate, and cerebellar activity. Journal of Neuroscience, 24, 1101711022.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kanayama, G., Rogowska, J., Pope, H. G., et al (2004) Spatial working memory in heavy cannabis users: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Psychopharmacology (Berlin), 176, 239247.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kilts, C. D., Schweitzer, J. B., Quinn, C. K., et al (2001) Neural activity related to drug craving in cocaine addiction. Archives of General Psychiatry, 58, 334341.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lim, K. O., Zipursky, R. B., Watts, M. C., et al (1992) Decreased gray matter in normal aging: an in vivo magnetic resonance study. Journal of Gerontology, 47, B2630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mathalon, D. H., Sullivan, E. V., Lim, K. O., et al (2001) Progressive brain volume changes and the clinical course of schizophrenia in men: a longitudinal magnetic resonance imaging study. Archives of General Psychiatry, 58, 148157.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Matochik, J. A., London, E. D., Eldreth, D. A., et al (2003) Frontal cortical tissue composition in abstinent cocaine abusers: a magnetic resonance imaging study. Neurolmage, 19, 10951102.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Matochik, J. A., Eldreth, D. A., Cadet, J. L., et al (2005) Altered brain tissue composition in heavy marijuana users. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 77, 2330.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Molina, V., Sanz, J., Sarramea, F., et al (2004) Lower prefrontal gray matter volume in schizophrenia in chronic but not in first episode schizophrenia patients. Psychiatry Research, 131, 4556.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oldfield, R. C. (1971) The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh Inventory. Neuropsychologia, 9, 97114.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ono, M., Kubik, S. & Abernathy, C. D. (1990) Atlas of the Cerebral Sulci. Thieme.Google Scholar
Otsu, N. A. (1979) Thresholding selection method from gray-level histogram. IEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 9, 6266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pantelis, C., Velakoulis, D., McGorry, P. D., et al (2003) Neuroanatomical abnormalities before and after onset of psychosis: a cross-sectional and longitudinal MRI comparison. Lancet, 361, 281288.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pillay, S. S., Rogowska, J., Kanayama, G., et al (2004) Neurophysiology of motor function following cannabis discontinuation in chronic cannabis smokers: an fMRI study. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 76, 261271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rademacher, J., Galaburda, A. M., Kennedy, D. N., et al (1992) Human cerebral cortex: localization, parcellation, and morphometry with magnetic resonance imaging. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 4, 352374.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schachter, S. C., Ransil, B. J. & Geschwind, N. (1987) Associations of handedness with hair color and learning disabilities. Neuropsychologia, 25, 269276.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shidara, M. & Richmond, B. J. (2002) Anterior cingulate: single neuronal signals related to degree of reward expectancy. Science, 296, 17091711.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, A. M., Fried, P. A. & Hogan, M. J., et al (2004) Effects of prenatal marijuana on response inhibition: an fMRI study of young adults. Neurotoxicology and Teratology, 26, 533542.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Spitzer, R. L. & Williams, D. (1988) Structured Clinical Interview for Diagnoses-Nonpatent Version. New York State Psychiatric Institute.Google Scholar
Szeszko, P. R., Bilder, R. M., Lencz, T., et al (1999) Investigation of frontal lobe subregions in first-episode schizophrenia. Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging, 90, 115.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Szeszko, P. R., Bilder, R. M., Lencz, T., et al (2000) Reduced anterior cingulate gyrus volume correlates with executive dysfunction in men with first-episode schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Research, 43, 97108.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Szeszko, P. R., Macmillan, S., McMeniman, M., et al (2004) Brain structural abnormalities in psychotropic drug-naive pediatric patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder. American Journal of Psychiatry, 161, 10491056.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tucker, K. A., Potenza, M. N., Beauvais, J. E., et al (2004) Perfusion abnormalities and decision making in cocaine dependence. Biological Psychiatry, 56, 527530.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van Mastrigt, S., Addington, J. & Addington, D. (2004) Substance misuse at presentation to an early psychosis program. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 39, 6972.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verrico, C. D., Jentsch, J. D., Roth, R. H. (2003) Persistent and anatomically selective reduction in prefrontal cortical dopamine metabolism after repeated, intermittent cannabinoid administration to rats. Synapse, 49, 6166.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Whitlow, C.T., Liguori, A., Livengood, L. B., et al (2004) Long-term heavy marijuana users make costly decisions on a gambing task. Drugand Alcohol Dependence, 76, 107111.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wilson, W., Mathew, R., Turkington, T., et al (2000) Brain morphological changes and early marijuana use: a magnetic resonance and positron emission tomography study. Journal of Addictive Disorders, 19, 122.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yucel, M., Pantelis, C., Stuart, G. W., et al (2002) Anterior cingulate activation during Stroop task performance: a PET to MRI coregistration study of individual patients with schizophrenia. American Journal of Psychiatry, 159, 251254.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Full text views

Full text views reflects PDF downloads, PDFs sent to Google Drive, Dropbox and Kindle and HTML full text views.

Total number of HTML views: 87
Total number of PDF views: 180 *
View data table for this chart

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 02nd January 2018 - 3rd March 2021. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Access

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Anterior cingulate grey-matter deficits and cannabis use in first-episode schizophrenia
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Anterior cingulate grey-matter deficits and cannabis use in first-episode schizophrenia
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Anterior cingulate grey-matter deficits and cannabis use in first-episode schizophrenia
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response


Your details


Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *