Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-m9pkr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-11T06:59:58.368Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Social Representations, Correspondence Factor Analysis and Characterization Questionnaire: a Methodological Contribution

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 January 2013

Grégory Lo Monaco*
Affiliation:
Aix-Marseille Université (France)
Anthony Piermattéo
Affiliation:
Aix-Marseille Université (France)
Christian Guimelli
Affiliation:
Aix-Marseille Université (France)
Jean-Claude Abric
Affiliation:
Aix-Marseille Université (France)
*
Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Grégory Lo Monaco. Aix-Marseille Université, Laboratoire de Psychologie Sociale (LPS EA849), 13621 Aix-en-Provence Cedex 1 (France). Phone: +33-0413553491. E mail: gregory.lo-monaco@univ-amu.fr

Abstract

The characterization questionnaire is inspired by Q-sort methodologies (i.e. qualitative sorting). It consists in asking participants to give their opinion on a list of items by sorting them into categories depending on their level of characterization of the object. This technique allows us to obtain distributions for each item and each response modality (i.e. characteristic vs. not chosen vs. not characteristic). This contribution intends to analyze these frequencies by means of correspondence factor analysis. The originality of this contribution lies in the fact that this kind of analysis has never been used to process data collected by means of this questionnaire. The procedure will be detailed and exemplified by means of two empirical studies on social representations of the good wine and the good supermarket. The interests of such a contribution will be discussed from both methodological points of view and an applications perspective.

El cuestionario de caracterización se inspira en metodologías Q (es decir, clasificación cualitativa). Consiste en pedir a los participantes que den su opinión sobre una lista de artículos, clasificándolos en categorías en función de su nivel de caracterización del objeto. Esta técnica nos permite obtener distribuciones para cada artículo y cada modalidad de respuesta (característico vs. no elegido vs no característico). Esta contribución propone analizar estas frecuencias por medio de análisis factorial de correspondencias. La originalidad de este artículo radica en el hecho de que este tipo de análisis nunca se ha utilizado para procesar datos recogidos mediante este cuestionario. Se detallará y ejemplificará el procedimiento a través de dos estudios empíricos sobre las representaciones sociales del buen vino y el buen supermercado. El interés de dicha contribución será discutido tanto desde el punto de vista metodológico como desde la perspectiva de las aplicaciones.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abric, J. C. (2001a). A structural approach to social representations. In Deaux, K. & Philogène, G. (Eds.), Representations of the social: Bridging theoretical traditions (pp. 4247). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
Abric, J. C. (2001b). L'approche structurale des représentations sociales: Développements récents [The structural approach to social representations: Recent improvements]. Psychologie et Société, 4, 81103.Google Scholar
Abric, J. C. (2003). La recherche du noyau central et de la zone muette des représentations sociales [The searching for the central core and the dumb zone of social representations]. In Abric, J. C. (Ed.), Méthodes d'étude des représentations sociales [Methods for studying social representations] (pp. 5980). Ramonville Saint-Agne, France: Erès.Google Scholar
Apostolidis, T. (2003). Représentations sociales et triangulation: Enjeux théorico-méthodologiques [Social representations and triangulation: Theoretical and methodological stakes]. In Abric, J. C. (Ed.), Méthodes d'étude des représentations sociales [Methods for studying social representations] (pp. 1335). Ramonville Saint-Agne, France: Erès.Google Scholar
Benzécri, J. P. (1976). L'analyse des correspondances [The correspondence analysis]. Paris, France: Dunod.Google Scholar
Charters, S., & Pettigrew, S. (2007). The dimensions of wine quality. Food Quality and Preference, 18, 9971007. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2007.04.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clémence, A. (2003). Sens et analyse des différences dans les représentations sociales [Meaning and analyse of the differences in the social representations]. In Abric, J. C. (Ed.), Méthodes d'étude des représentations sociales [Methods for studying social representations] (pp. 165177). Ramonville Saint-Agne, France: Erès.Google Scholar
Dany, L., & Abric, J. C. (2007). Distance à l'objet et représentations du cannabis [Distance to the object and representations of cannabis]. Revue Internationale de Psychologie Sociale, 20, 77104.Google Scholar
Dawar, N., & Parker, P. (1994). Marketing universals: Consumer use of brand name, price, physical appearance, and retailer reputation, as signals of product quality. Journal of Marketing Research, 58, 8195. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1252271Google Scholar
Deschamps, J. C. (2003). Analyse des correspondances et variations des contenus des représentations sociales [Correspondence analysis and variations in the content of social representations]. In Abric, J. C. (Ed.), Méthodes d'étude des représentations sociales [Methods for studying social representations] (pp. 179200). Ramonville Saint-Agne, France: Erès.Google Scholar
Doise, W. (1992). Les ancrages dans l'étude des représentations sociales [The anchorings in the study of social representations]. Bulletin de Psychologie, 45, 189195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doise, W. (2002). Human rights as social representations. London-New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Doise, W., Clémence, A., & Lorenzi-Cioldi, F. (1993). The quantitative analysis of social representations. Hemel Hempstead, England: Harvester Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
Flament, C. (1981). L'analyse de similitude: Une technique pour la recherche sur les représentations sociales [The similitude analysis: A technique for the study of social representations]. Cahiers de psychologie cognitive, 1, 375395.Google Scholar
Flament, C., & Milland, L. (2003). Un effet Guttman dans l'analyse des représentations sociales [A Guttman effect in the analysis of social representations]. In Abric, J. C. (Ed.), Méthodes d'étude des représentations sociales [Methods for studying social representations] (pp. 201220). Ramonville Saint-Agne, France: Erès.Google Scholar
Flament, C., & Milland, L. (2005). Un effet Guttman en ACP [A Guttman effect in PCA]. Mathématiques et Sciences Humaines, 171, 2549. http://dx.doi.org/10.4000/msh.2946Google Scholar
Flament, C., & Milland, L. (2010). La substitution dans les études de représentations sociales: Quel processus impliqué [The use of substitution in the study of social representations: What process is involved?] Psychologie Française, 55, 195210. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.psfr.2010.05.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaymard, S. (2006). The representation of old people: Comparison between the professionals and students. International Review of Social Psychology, 19, 6992.Google Scholar
Guimelli, C. (1989). Pratiques nouvelles et transformation sans rupture d'une représentation sociale: L'exemple de la représentation de la chasse et de la nature [New practices and progressive transformation of a social representation: The exemple of the representation of hunting and nature]. In Beauvois, J. L., Joule, R. V., & Monteil, J. M., (Eds.), Perspectives cognitives et conduites sociales 2. Représentations et processus cognitifs [Cognitive perspectives and social behavior 2. Representations and cognitive processes] (pp. 117138). Cousset-Fribourg, Switzerland: Del Val.Google Scholar
Guimelli, C. (1994). La fonction d'infirmière. Pratiques et représentations sociales [The nurse's duties. Practices and social representations]. In Abric, J. C. (Ed.), Pratiques sociales et représentations [Social practices and representations] (pp. 83107). Paris, France: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Guimelli, C. (1998). Chasse et nature en Languedoc. Etude de la dynamique d'une représentation sociale chez des chasseurs languedociens [Hunting and nature in Languedoc. The study of the dynamic of a social representation among Languedocian hunters]. Paris, France: L'Harmattan.Google Scholar
Guimelli, C. (2003). Le modèle des schèmes cognitifs de base (SCB). Méthode et applications [The basic cognitive schemes model (BCS). Methodology and applications]. In Abric, J. C. (Ed.), Méthodes d'étude des représentations sociales [Methods for studying social representations] (pp. 119146). Ramonville Saint-Agne, France: Erès.Google Scholar
Guimelli, C., & Deschamps, J. C. (2000). Effets de contexte sur la production d'associations verbales. Le cas des représentations sociales des Gitans [Context effects on the production of verbal associations. The case of the social representations of Gypsies]. Cahiers Internationaux de Psychologie Sociale, 47–48, 44–54.Google Scholar
Guimelli, C., & Rouquette, M. L. (1992). Contribution du modèle associatif des schèmes cognitifs de base à l'analyse structurale des représentations sociales [Contribution of the associative model of the basic cognitive schemes to the structural analysis of social representations]. Bulletin de Psychologie, 45, 196202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacoby, J., Olson, J. C., & Haddock, R. A. (1971). Price, brand name and product composition characteristics as determinants of perceived quality. Journal of Applied Psychology, 55, 570579. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0032045CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lo Monaco, G., & Guimelli, C. (2008). Représentations sociales, pratique de consommation et niveau de connaissance: Le cas du vin [Social representations, consumption practices and level of knowledge: The case of wine]. Les Cahiers Internationaux de Psychologie Sociale, 78, 3550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lo Monaco, G., & Guimelli, C. (2011). Hegemonic and polemical beliefs: Culture and consumption in the social representation of wine. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 14, 232245. http://dx.doi.org/10.5209/rev_SJOP.2011.v14.n1.21CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lo Monaco, G., Lheureux, F., & Halimi-Falkowicz, S. (2008). Test d'Indépendance au Contexte (TIC) et Structure des Représentations Sociales [Test of Context Independence (TCI) and Structure of Social Representations]. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 67, 119123. http://dx.doi.org/10.1024/1421-0185.67.2.119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maheswaran, D. (1994). Country of origin as stereotypes: The effects of consumer expertise and attribute information on product evaluations. Journal of Consumer Research, 21, 354365. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/209403CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moliner, P. (1989). Validation expérimentale de l'hypothèse du noyau central des représentations sociales [Experimental validation of the hypothesis of the central core of social representations]. Bulletin de Psychologie, 41, 759762.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moliner, P. (1994). Les méthodes de repérage et d'identification du noyau des représentations sociales [The methodologies for spotting and identifying the central core of social representations]. In Guimelli, C. (Ed.), Structures et transformation des représentations sociales [Structures and change of social representations] (pp. 199232). Lausanne, Switzerland: Delachaux et Niestlé.Google Scholar
Moscovici, S. (2008). Psychoanalysis, its image and its public. Cambridge, MA: Polity PressGoogle Scholar
Oliveira, A., & Amaral, V. (2007). A análise factorial de correspondências na investigação em psicologia: Uma aplicação ao estudo das representações sociais do suicídio adolescente [The factorial analysis of correspondences in research in psychology: An application to the study of social representations of teen suicide]. Análise Psicológica, 25, 271293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olson, J. C. (1977). Price as an informational cue: Effects in product evaluation. In Woodside, A. G., Sheth, J. N., & Bennet, P. D. (Eds.), Consumer and industrial buying behavior (pp. 267286). New York, NY: North-Holland Publishers.Google Scholar
Rateau, P., Moliner, P., Guimelli, C., & Abric, J. C. (2011). Social representation theory. In Lange, P. A. Van, Kruglanski, A. W., & Higgins, E. T. (Eds.), Handbook of theories of social psychology (pp. 477497). London, England: Sage.Google Scholar
Rouquette, M. L., & Rateau, P. (1998). Introduction à l'étude des représentations sociales [Introduction to the study of social representations]. Grenoble, France: Presses Universitaires de Grenoble.Google Scholar
Salesses, L. (2004). Rôle du niveau de connaissance dans le processus de structuration d'une représentation sociale [The role of the level of knowledge in the structuration process of a social representation]. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Université de Provence, Aix-en-Provence, France.Google Scholar
Spini, D. (2002). Multidimensional scaling: A technique for the quantitative analysis of the common field of social representations. European Review of Applied Psychology, 52, 231240.Google Scholar
Spini, D., & Doise, W. (1998). Organising principles of involvement in human rights and their social anchoring in value priorities. European Journal of Social Psychology, 28, 603622. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0992(199807/08)28:4<603::AID-EJSP884>3.0.CO;2-P3.0.CO;2-P>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vergès, P. (2001). L'analyse des représentations sociales par questionnaires [The analysis of social representations by means of questionnaires]. Revue Française de Sociologie, 42, 537561. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3323032CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verdú Jover, A. J., Lloréns Montes, F. J., & del Mar Fuentes Fuentes, M. (2004). Measuring perceptions of quality in food products: The case of red wine. Food Quality and Preference, 15, 453469. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2003.08.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zeithaml, V. (1988). Consumer perceptions of price, quality and value. A means-end model and synthesis of evidence. Journal of Marketing, 52, 222. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1251446CrossRefGoogle Scholar