Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-25wd4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T21:26:32.165Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Professionals' Criteria for Detecting and Reporting Child Sexual Abuse

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 January 2013

Eva González Ortega ,
Begoña Orgaz Baz  and
Félix López Sánchez
Eva González Ortega*
Affiliation:
Universidad de Salamanca (Spain)
Begoña Orgaz Baz
Affiliation:
Universidad de Salamanca (Spain)
Félix López Sánchez
Affiliation:
Universidad de Salamanca (Spain)
*
Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Eva González Ortega. Departamento de Psicología Evolutiva y de la Educación, Facultad de Psicología, Universidad de Salamanca. Avda. de la Merced, 109-131, 37005, Salamanca (Spain). E-mail: evagonz@usal.es
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Professionals who are likely to come into contact with children play an essential role in the protection of children, thus we aimed to study the criteria they use to identify and report child sexual abuse cases. Based on the Factorial Survey design, we presented 974 Spanish (90%) and Latin American professionals from six fields (Psychology, Social Services, Education, Health, Law and Security) with hypothetical situations of sexual interaction with minors (systematically varying the type of sexual act, the child's and the other person's sex and age, the use of coercion and the type of strategy employed to involve the child), in order to examine their perception of abuse and willingness to report. According to results, the factors or criteria that most impact assessments are age asymmetry and use of coercion. Specifically, professionals are significantly more likely to perceive abuse and intend to report it if the other person involved in the interaction is much older than the minor and/or uses a coercive strategy, especially force, drugs or blackmail. Another relevant criterion is the type of sexual act, since acts involving intercourse, digital penetration or oral sex are significantly more likely to be deemed as abuse and reported.

Los profesionales de disciplinas que favorecen el contacto con niños/as juegan un papel esencial en la protección de la infancia y por ello, estudiamos cuáles son los criterios que aplican para detectar y denunciar casos de abuso sexual. Basándonos en la Encuesta Factorial, preguntamos a 974 profesionales españoles (90%) y latinoamericanos de seis ramas distintas (Psicología, Servicios Sociales, Educación, Salud, Justicia y Seguridad) si consideran abusivas y si denunciarían diversas situaciones hipotéticas de interacción sexual (variando sistemáticamente el tipo de conducta sexual, el sexo y la edad del menor y la otra persona, el uso de coerción y la estrategia usada para implicar al menor). Los resultados indican que la asimetría de edad y el uso de coerción son los criterios que más tienen en cuenta los profesionales; en concreto, la probabilidad de percibir un abuso y denunciar es significativamente mayor si la otra persona en la interacción tiene mucha más edad que el menor y/o usa una estrategia coercitiva, especialmente, las drogas, la fuerza o el chantaje. Otro criterio importante es el tipo de conducta sexual, dado que los actos de coito, penetración digital, y sexo oral tienen una probabilidad significativamente mayor de percibirse como abusivos y ser denunciados.

Keywords

sexual abuseminorsprofessionalsperceptionFactorial Surveyabuso sexualmenoresprofesionalespercepciónEncuesta Factorial
Type
Research Article
Information
The Spanish Journal of Psychology , Volume 15 , Issue 3 , November 2012 , pp. 1325 - 1338
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alexander, C. S., & Becker, H. J. (1978). The use of vignettes in survey research. Public Opinion Quarterly, 42, 93–104. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/268432CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ashton, V. (1999). Worker judgements of seriousness about and reporting of suspected child maltreatment. Child Abuse & Neglect, 23, 539–548. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0145-2134(99)00032-0CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Atteberry-Bennett, J. (1987). Child sexual abuse: Definitions and interventions of parents and professionals. Doctoral Dissertations International, 49(6-B). (University Microfilms N° AAT 8819827).Google Scholar
Bornstein, B. H., Kaplan, D. L., & Perry, A. R. (2007). Child abuse in the eyes of the beholder: Lay perceptions of child sexual and physical abuse. Child Abuse & Neglect, 31, 375–391. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2006.09.007CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Briere, J. N., & Runtz, M. (1988). Symptomatology associated with childhood sexual victimization in a nonclinical adult sample. Child Abuse & Neglect, 12, 51–59. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0145-2134(88)90007-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Constantine, L. L. (1981). The effects of early sexual experience: A review and synthesis of research. In Constantine, L. L. & Martinson, F. M. (Eds.), Children and sex: New findings, new perspectives (pp. 217–244). Boston, MA: Little, Brown and Company.Google Scholar
Dollar, K. M., Perry, A. R., Fromuth, M. E., & Holth, A. R. (2004). Influence of gender roles on perceptions of teacher/adolescent student sexual relation. Sex Roles, 50, 91–101. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/B:SERS.0000011075.91908.98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, J., & Alexander, P. (1992). The contribution of family background to the long-term adjustment of women sexually abused as children. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 7, 306–320. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/088626092007003002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eisenberg, N., Owens, R. G., & Dewey, M. E. (1987). Attitudes of health professionals to child sexual abuse and incest. Child Abuse & Neglect, 11, 109–116. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0145-2134(87)90039-1CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
English, D. J., & the LONGSCAN Investigators (1997). Modified Maltreatment Classification System (MMCS). North Carolina, NC: University of North Carolina. Retrieved from http://www.iprc.unc.edu/longscan/pages/mmcs/LONGSCAN%20MMCS%20Coding.pdfGoogle Scholar
Faller, K. C. (1993). Child sexual abuse: Intervention and treatment issues. Mc Lean, VA: The Circle, Inc. & US Department of Health and Human Services.Google Scholar
Faller, K. C. (2003). Understanding and assessing child sexual maltreatment. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finkelhor, D. (1979). What's wrong with sex between adults and children?. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 49, 692–697. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1939-0025.1979.tb02654.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Finkelhor, D. (1984). Child sexual abuse: New theory and research. New York, NY: Free Press.Google Scholar
Finkelhor, D. (1994). Current information on the scope and nature of child sexual abuse. Sexual Abuse of Children. The Future of Children, 4, 31–53. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1602522CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finkelhor, D., & Redfield, D. (1984). How the public defines sexual abuse. In Finkelhor, D. (Ed.), Child sexual abuse: New theory and research (pp. 12–32). New York, NY: Free Press.Google Scholar
Finlayson, L., & Koocher, G., (1991). Professional judgement and child abuse reporting in sexual abuse cases. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 22, 464–472. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037//0735-7028.22.6.464CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fritz, G., Stoll, K., & Wagner, N. (1981). A comparison of males and females who were sexually molested as children. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, 7, 54–59. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00926238108403440CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fromuth, M., & Burkhart, B. (1989). Long-term psychological correlates of childhood sexual abuse in two samples of college men. Child Abuse & Neglect, 13, 533–542. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0145-2134(89)90057-4CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gil, E., & Johnson, T. C. (1993). Sexualized children: Assessment and treatment of sexualized children and children who molest. Rockville, MD: Launch Press.Google Scholar
Giovannoni, I., & Becerra, R. (1979). Defining child abuse. New York, NY: Free Press.Google Scholar
Goldman, R., & Goldman, J. (1988). The prevalence and nature of child sexual abuse in Queensland, Australia. Australian Journal of Sex, Marriage and Family, 9, 94–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
González, E. (2009). Criterios de salud sexual infantil. La visión de los profesionales y su implicación en la detección y denuncia de los abusos sexuales [Child sexual health criteria. The view of professionals and its implication on the detection and reporting of sexual abuse cases] (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Universidad de Salamanca, Spain.Google Scholar
Graupner, H. (2004). Sexual consent: The criminal law in Europe and outside of Europe. Journal of Psychology and Human Sexuality, 16, 111–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffith, J. W. (2001). Professionals' beliefs regarding child sexual abuse. Journal of Threat Assessment, 1, 35–61. http://dx.doi.org/10.1300/J177v01n02_03CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartman, G. L., Karlson, H., & Hibbard, R. A. (1994). Attorney attitudes regarding behaviors associated with child sexual abuse. Child Abuse & Neglect, 18, 657–662. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0145-2134(94)90015-9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Haugaard, J. J. (1996). Sexual behaviors between children: Professionals' opinions and undergraduates' recollections. Families in Society, 77, 81–89. http://dx.doi.org/10.1606/1044-3894.850CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hetherton, J., & Beardsall, L. (1998). Decisions and attitudes concerning child sexual abuse: Does the gender of the perpetrator make a difference to child protection professionals?. Child Abuse & Neglect, 22, 1265–1283. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0145-2134(98)00101-XCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hicks, C., & Tite, R. (1998). Professionals' attitudes about victims of child sexual abuse: Implications for collaborative child protection teams. Child and Family Social Work, 3, 37–48. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2206.1998.00063.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hughes, R., & Huby, M. (2002). The application of vignettes in social and nursing research. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 37, 382–386. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.2002.02100.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jackson, H., & Nuttall, R. (1993). Clinician responses to sexual abuse allegations. Child Abuse and Neglect, 17, 127–143. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0145-2134(93)90013-UCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johnson, T. C. (2002). Understanding children's sexual behaviors: What's natural and healthy. South Pasadena, CA: Johnson, T. C..Google Scholar
Kalichman, S. C., Craig, M. E., & Follingstad, D. R. (1989). Factors influencing the reporting of father-child sexual abuse: Study of licensed practicing psychologists. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 20, 84–89. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037//0735-7028.20.2.84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennel, R. C., & Agresti, A. A. (1995). Effects of gender and age on psychologists' reporting of child sexual abuse. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 26, 612–615. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037//0735-7028.26.6.612CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kite, D., & Tyson, G. A. (2004). The impact of perpetrator gender on male and female police officers' perceptions of child sexual abuse. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 11, 308–318. http://dx.doi.org/10.1375/1321871042707304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ko, C., & Koh, C. (2007). The influence of abuse situation and respondent background characteristics on Korean nurses' perceptions of child sexual abuse: A fractional factorial design. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 44, 1165–1176. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2006.05.009CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
López, F. (1995). Prevención de los abusos sexuales de menores y educación sexual [Prevention of child sexual abuse and sex education]. Salamanca, Spain: Amarú.Google Scholar
Ludwick, R., & Zeller, R. A. (2001). The factorial survey: An experimental method to replicate real world problems. Nursing Research, 50, 129–133. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00006199-200103000-00009CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Masson, H., & Morrison, T. (1999). Young sexual abusers: Conceptual frameworks, issues and imperatives. Children & Society, 13, 203–215. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1099-0860.1999.tb00125.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maynard, M., & Wiederman, M. (1997). Undergraduate students' perceptions of child sexual abuse: Effects of age, sex, and gender-role attitudes. Child Abuse & Neglect, 21, 833–844. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0145-2134(97)00045-8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Posner, R. A., & Silbaugh, K. B. (1996). A guide to America's sex laws. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Preuss, N. (1988). A survey of the prevalence of childhood sexual victimization among 18–21 year old college students and its relationship to alcohol abuse and bulimia. Dissertation Abstracts International, 48(12-B) (University Microfilms N° AAT 8727869).Google Scholar
Rind, B., Tromovitch, P., & Bauserman, R. (1998). A meta-analytic examination of assumed properties of child sexual abuse using college samples. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 22–53. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037//0033-2909.124.1.22CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rogers, P., & Davies, M. (2007). Perceptions of victims and perpetrators in a depicted child sexual abuse case: Gender and age factors. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 22, 566–584. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0886260506298827CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rossi, P. H., & Nock, S. L. (1982). Measuring social judgments: The factorial aurvey approach. Beverley Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Sexuality Information and Education Council of the United States, SIECUS (2004). What is normal childhood sexual development?. Families Are Talking, 3. Retrieved from http://www.sexedsolutions.com/Sexual_Development.pdfGoogle Scholar
Shaw, J. A. (2000). Summary of the practice parameters for the assessment and treatment of children and adolescents who are sexually abusive of others. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 39, 127–130. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00004583-200001000-00029CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siegel, J. M., Sorenson, S. B., Golding, J. M., Burnam, M. A., & Stein, J. A. (1987). The prevalence of childhood sexual assault: The Los Angeles Epidemiologic Catchment Area Project. American Journal of Epidemiology, 126, 1141–1153.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sniderman, P. M., & Grob, D. B. (1996). Innovations in experimental design in attitude surveys. Annual Review of Sociology, 22, 377–399. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.22.1.377CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sperry, D. M., & Gilbert, B. O. (2005). Child peer sexual abuse: Preliminary data on outcomes and disclosure experiences. Child Abuse & Neglect, 29, 889–904. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2004.12.011CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Steiner, P. M., & Atzmuller, C. (2006). Experimentelle vignettendesigns in faktoriellen surveys [Experimental vignette designs for factorial surveys]. Kolner-Zeitschrift fur Soziologie und Sozialpycholgie, 58, 117–146. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11575-006-0006-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Struckman-Johnson, C., Struckman-Johnson, D., & Anderson, P. B. (2003). Tactics of sexual coercion: When men and women won't take no for an answer. The Journal of Sex Research, 40, 76–86. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00224490309552168CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tang, C. S. (2002). Childhood experience of sexual abuse among Hong Kong Chinese college students. Child Abuse & Neglect, 26, 23–37. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0145-2134(01)00306-4CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Taylor, B. J. (2006). Factorial surveys: Using vignettes to study professional judgement. British Journal of Social Work, 36, 1187–1207. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bch345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wagner, W. G., Aucon, R., & Johnson, J. T. (1993). Psychologists' attitudes concerning child sexual abuse: The impact of sex of perpetrator, sex of victim, age of victim, and victim response. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse, 2, 61–74. http://dx.doi.org/10.1300/J070v02n02_05CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walsh, K. M., Farrell, A. M., Schweitzer, R., & Bridgstock, R. S. (2005). Critical factors in teachers' detecting and reporting child abuse and neglect: Implications for practice. Kelvin Grove, Australia: Queensland University of Technology for Abused Child Trust.Google Scholar