Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Does Bold Emphasis Facilitate the Process of Visual-Word Recognition?

  • María Macaya (a1) and Manuel Perea (a2)

Abstract

The study of the effects of typographical factors on lexical access has been rather neglected in the literature on visual-word recognition. Indeed, current computational models of visual-word recognition employ an unrefined letter feature level in their coding schemes. In a letter recognition experiment, Pelli, Burns, Farell, and Moore-Page (2006), letters in Bookman boldface produced more efficiency (i.e., a higher ratio of thresholds of an ideal observer versus a human observer) than the letters in Bookman regular under visual noise. Here we examined whether the effect of bold emphasis can be generalized to a common visual-word recognition task (lexical decision: “is the item a word?”) under standard viewing conditions. Each stimulus was presented either with or without bold emphasis (e.g., actor vs. actor). To help determine the locus of the effect of bold emphasis, word-frequency (low vs. high) was also manipulated. Results revealed that responses to words in boldface were faster than the responses to the words without emphasis –this advantage was restricted to low-frequency words. Thus, typographical features play a non-negligible role during visual-word recognition and, hence, the letter feature level of current models of visual-word recognition should be amended.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Does Bold Emphasis Facilitate the Process of Visual-Word Recognition?
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Does Bold Emphasis Facilitate the Process of Visual-Word Recognition?
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Does Bold Emphasis Facilitate the Process of Visual-Word Recognition?
      Available formats
      ×

Copyright

Corresponding author

*Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Manuel Perea. Departamento de Metodología. Av. Blasco Ibáñez, 21. 46010.Valencia (Spain). FAX: +34-963864697. Email: mperea@valencia.edu

References

Hide All
Balota, D. A., Yap, M. J., Cortese, M. J., Hutchison, K. A., Kessler, B., Loftis, B., …, Treiman, R. (2007). The English lexicon project. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 445459. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03193014
Balota, D. A., Yap, M. J., & Cortese, M. J. (2006). Visual word recognition: The journey from features to meaning (A travel update). In Traxler, M. & Gernsbacher, M. A. (Eds.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (2 nd Ed., pp. 285375). New York, NY: Academic Press.
Blais, C., Fiset, D., Jolicoeur, P., Arguin, M., Bub, D. N., & Gosselin, F. (2009). Reading between eye saccades. PLoS ONE 4(7): e6448. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0006448
Coltheart, M., Rastle, K., Perry, C., Ziegler, J., & Langdon, R. (2001). DRC: A dual-route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. Psychological Review, 108, 204256. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.108.1.204
Davis, C. J., & Perea, M. (2005). BuscaPalabras: A program for deriving orthographic and phonological neighborhood statistics and other psycholinguistic indices in Spanish. Behavior Research Methods, 37, 665671. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03192738
Davis, C. J. (2010). The spatial coding model of visual word identification. Psychological Review, 117, 713758. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0019738
Forster, K. I., & Forster, J. C. (2003). DMDX: A windows display program with millisecond accuracy. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 35, 116124. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03195503
Grainger, J., & Jacobs, A. M. (1996). Orthographic processing in visual word recognition: A multiple read-out model. Psychological Review, 103, 518565. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.103.3.518
Hannagan, T., Ktori, M., Chanceaux, M., & Grainger, J. (2012). Deciphering CAPTCHAs: What a turing test reveals about human cognition. Plos One, 7(3), e32121. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0032121
McClelland, J. L., & Rumelhart, D. E. (1981). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: Part 1. An account of basic findings. Psychological Review, 88, 375407. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037%2F0033-295X.88.5.375
Pelli, D. G., Burns, C. W., Farell, B., & Moore-Page, D. C. (2006). Feature detection and letter identification. Vision Research, 46, 46464674. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2006.04.023
Perea, M. (2013). Why does the APA recommend the use of serif fonts? Psicothema, 25, 1317. http://dx.doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2012.141
Perea, M., & Acha, J. (2009). Space information is important for reading. Vision Research, 49, 19942000. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2009.05.009
Perea, M., & Gómez, P. (2012). Increasing interletter spacing facilitates encoding of words. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 19, 332338. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13423-011-0214-6
Perea, M., & Rosa, E. (2002). Does “whole word shape” play a role in visual word recognition? Perception & Psychophysics, 64, 785794. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03194745
Perea, M., Comesaña, M., & Soares, A. P. (2012). Does the advantage of the upper part of words occur at the lexical level? Memory and Cognition, 8, 12571265. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13421-012-0219-z
Perea, M., Rosa, E., & Gómez, C. (2005). The frequency effect for pseudowords in the lexical decision task. Perception and Psychophysics, 67, 301314. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758%2FBF03206493
Pollatsek, A., & Well, A. D. (1995). On the use of counterbalanced designs in cognitive research: A suggestion for a better and more powerful analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 785794. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.21.3.785
Rayner, K. (2009). Eye movements and attention in reading, scene perception, and visual search. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62, 14571506. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1747021090281646
Rumelhart, D. E., & Siple, P. (1974). The process of recognizing tachistoscopically presented words. Psychological Review, 81, 99118. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0036117
Sanocki, T., & Dyson, M. C. (2012). Letter processing and font information during reading: Beyond distinctiveness, where vision meets design. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 74, 132145. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13414-011-0220-9
Slattery, T. J., & Rayner, K. (2010). Eye movements and text legibility. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 24, 11291148. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acp.1623
Sternberg, S. (1969). The discovery of processing stages: Extensions of donders’ method. In Koster, W. G. (Ed.), Attention and performance II (pp. 276315). Amsterdam, The Netherlands. North-Holland Publishing Company.
Tinker, M. A. (1963). Legibility of print. Iowa, IA: Iowa State University Press.
Van Orden, G. C., & Goldinger, S. D. (1994). Interdependence of form and function in cognitive systems explains perception of printed words. Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance, 20, 1269–91. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.20.6.1269

Keywords

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed