Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-k7p5g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-12T19:01:01.392Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Estimating One's Own and One's Relatives' Multiple Intelligence: A Cross-Cultural Study from East Timor and Portugal

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 January 2013

Félix Neto*
Affiliation:
Universidade do Porto (Portugal)
Adrian Furnham
Affiliation:
University College London (UK)
Maria da Conceição Pinto
Affiliation:
Universidade do Porto (Portugal)
*
Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Félix Neto, Faculdade de Psicologia e de Ciências da Educação, Universidade do Porto, Rua Dr. Manuel Pereira da Silva, 4200–392 Porto, (Portugal). Email: fneto@fpce.up.pt

Abstract

This study examined estimates of their own, and their parents' general and multiple intelligences. Three hundred and twenty three students from East Timor, and one hundred eighty three students from Portugal estimated their own, and their parents' IQ scores on each of Gardner's ten multiple intelligences. Men believed they were more intelligent than were women on mathematical (logical), spatial, and naturalistic intelligence. There were consistent and clear culture differences. Portuguese gave higher self, and family ratings than Timorese, as expected. Participants of both cultures rated overall intelligence of their father higher than that of their mother. Implications of these results for education and self-presentations are considered.

Este estudio examinó las estimaciones de la inteligencia general y de las inteligencias múltiples, tanto la propia como la de los padres. 323 estudiantes de Timor Oriental y 183 estudiantes de Portugal estimaron su propia puntuación de CI y la de sus padres en cada una de las'inteligencias múltiples de Gardner. Los varones creían que eran más inteligentes que las mujeres en inteligencia matemática (lógica), espacial y naturalista. Había diferencias culturales claras y consistentes. Tal y como se esperaba, los portugueses se asignaron puntuaciones más altas a sí mismos y a sus familias que los timoreses. Los participantes de ambas culturas asignaban a sus padres puntuaciones más altas en inteligencia global que a sus madres. Se comentan las implicaciones de estos resultados para la educación y la auto-presentación.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baron-Cohen, S. (2003). The essential difference. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Beloff, H. (1992). Mother, father and me: Our IQ. The Psychologist, 5, 309311.Google Scholar
Bennett, M. (1996). Men's and women's self-estimates of intelligence. Journal of Social Psychology, 136, 411412.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bennett, M. (1997). Self–estimates of ability in men and women. Journal of Social Psychology, 137, 540541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bennett, M. (2000). Gender differences in the self–estimation of ability. Australian Journal of Psychology, 52, 2328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beyer, S. (1999). The accuracy of academic gender stereotypes. Sex Roles, 40, 787813.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beyer, S., & Bowden, E.M. (1997). Gender differences in self–perceptions: Convergent evidence from three measures of accuracy and bias. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 157172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bond, M. (1996). The handbook of Chinese psychology. Hong Kong: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Byrd, M., & Stacey, B. (1993). Bias in IQ perception. The Psychologist, 6, 16.Google Scholar
Chamorro-Prezumic, T., & Furnham, A. (2005). Personality and intellectual competence. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.Google Scholar
Chamorro-Premuzic, T., Furnham, A, & Moutafi, T. (2004). The relationship between estimated and psychometric personality and intelligence scores. Journal of Research in Personality, 38, 505513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dweck, C. (2000). Self-theories: Their role in motivation, personality, and development. Philadelphia: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Eysenck, H. (1981). Known your own IQ. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Flynn, J. (1999). Searching for justice: The discovery of IQ gains over time. American Psychologist, 54, 520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Furnham, A. (2000). Parent estimates of their own and their children's multiple intelligences. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 18, 583594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Furnham, A. (2001). Self–estimates of intelligence: Culture and gender differences in self and other estimates of general (g) and multiple intelligences. Personality and Individual Differences, 31, 13811405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Furnham, A., & Akande, A. (2004). African parents' estimates of their own and their children's multiple intelligences. Current Psychology, 22, 281294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Furnham, A., & Baguma, P. (1999). A cross–cultural study from three countries of self–estimates of intelligence. North American Journal of Psychology, 1, 6978.Google Scholar
Furnham, A., & Chamorro-Prezumic, T. (2005). Estimating one's own and one's relatives multiple intelligence: A study from Argentina. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 8, 1220.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Furnham, A., & Fong, G. (2000). Self–estimated and psychometrically measured intelligence: A cross–cultural and sex difference study. North American Journal of Psychology, 2, 191199.Google Scholar
Furnham, A., & Gasson, L. (1998). Sex differences in parental estimates of their children's intelligence. Sex Roles, 38, 151162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Furnham, A., & Rawles, R. (1995). Sex differences in the estimation of intelligence. Journal of Social Behaviour and Personality, 10, 741745.Google Scholar
Furnham, A., & Rawles, R. (1999). Correlations between self-estimates and psychometrically measured IQ. Journal of Social Psychology, 139, 405410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Furnham, A., Clark, K., & Bailey, K. (1999). Sex differences in estimates of multiple intelligences. European Journal of Personality, 13, 247259.3.0.CO;2-7>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Furnham, A., Fong, , & Martin, N. (1999). Sex and cross–cultural differences in the estimated multi–faceted intelligence quotient score for self, parents and siblings. Personality and Individual Differences, 26, 10251034.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Furnham, A., Hosoe, T., & Tang, T. (2001). Male hubris and female humility? A cross–cultural study of ratings of self, parental and sibling multiple intelligence in America, Britain, and Japan. Intelligence, 30, 101115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Furnham, A., Rakow, T., Sarmany-Schiller, I., & De Fruyt, F. (1999). European differences in self–perceived multiple intelligences. European Psychologist, 4, 131138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Furnham, A., Rakow, T., & Mak, T. (2002). The determinants of parents' beliefs about the intelligence of their children: A study from Hong Kong. International Journal of Psychology, 37, 343352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of mind: A theory of multiple intelligences. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Gardner, H. (1999). Intelligence reframed. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Goldstein, E. (1994). Psychology. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.Google Scholar
Greenfield, P. (1997). You can't take it all with you: Why ability assessments don't cross-cultures. American Psychologist, 52, 11151124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hogan, H. (1978). IQ self-estimates of males and females. Journal of Social Psychology, 106, 137138.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hyde, J. S. (2005). The gender similarities hypothesis. American Psychologist, 60, 581592.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lynn, R. (1994). Sex differences in intelligence and brain size: A paradox resolved. Personality and Individual Differences, 17, 257271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lynn, R. (1997). Geographic variations in intelligence. In Nyborg, H. (Ed.), The scientific study of human nature. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.Google Scholar
Mackintosh, N. (1998). IQ and human intelligence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Markus, H.R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neto, F., & Furnham, A. (2006). Gender differences in self-rated and partner-rated multiple intelligences: A Portuguese replication. The Journal of Psychology, 140(6), 591602.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Neto, F., Furnham, A., & Paz, R. (2007). Sex and culture differences in perceptions of estimated multiple intelligence for self and family: A Macanese-Portuguese comparison. International Journal of Psychology. 42, 124133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neto, F., Pinto, M., & Mullet, E. (2007a). Intergroup forgiveness: East Timorese and Angolan perspectives. Journal of Peace Research, 44, 711728.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neto, F., Pinto, M., & Mullet, E. (2007b). Seeking forgiveness in an intergroup context: Angolan, Guinean, Mozambican, and East Timorese perspectives. Regulation and Governance, 1, 329346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neto, F., Ruiz, F., & Furnham, A. (2008). Sex differences in self-estimation of multiple intelligences among Portuguese adolescents. High Ability Studies, 19, 189204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petrides, K., & Furnham, A. (2000). Gender differences in measured and self-estimated trait emotional intelligence. Sex Roles, 41, 449461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reily, J., & Mulhern, G. (1995). Gender differences in self-estimated IQ: The need for care in interpreting group data. Personality and Individual Differences, 18, 189192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, P., & Bond, M. (1998). Social psychology across cultures. London: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. (1990). Metaphors of mind: Conceptions of the nature of intelligence. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Yuen, M., & Furnham, A. (2005). Sex differences in self-estimation of multiple intelligences among Hong Kong Chinese adolescents. High Ability Studies, 16, 187199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar