Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-cnmwb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-20T06:55:56.887Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Legislative Committees in Polish Lawmaking

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 January 2017

Vincent C. Chrypinski
Vincent C. Chrypinski*
Affiliation:
University of Windsor, Ontario
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In recent years Poland's political life has produced a genuine and interesting revival of the Polish parliament, the Seym. It has been especially significant in the area of legislative committees, which not only grew in number but enlarged their sphere of activities and became more independent. The development had its sources in the “thaw” that followed the death of Stalin in 1953 and culminated in Poland in the so-called “October Revolt” of 1956.

Type
Articles
Information
Slavic Review , Volume 25 , Issue 2 , June 1966 , pp. 247 - 258
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Slavic, East European, and Eurasian Studies. 1966

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 For more information see my “Poland's Parliamentary Committees,” East Europe, No. 1 1965 PP. 17-24-

2 Between 1952 and 1956 this collective head of state issued no fewer than 155 decrees. In the same period the Seym passed only 43 statutes.

3 Parliaments (London: Cassell, 1962), p. 128.

4 Gwiżdż, Andrzej, “Kilka uwag na marginesie dwudziestolecia parlamentaryzmu ludowego w Polsce,” Państwo i Prawo, No. 7, 1964, p. 46.Google Scholar

5 For a concise description of the structure of the Seym, see Stefan, Rozmaryn, The Seym and People's Councils in Poland (Warsaw, 1958), p. 13–30.Google Scholar

6 Except for the Regulations Committee, the functions of which are strictly disciplinary.

7 Adam, Bromke, “The Znak Group in Poland” East Europe, Nos. 1 and 2, 1962.Google Scholar

8 Ludwik, Pol, “Uwagi o pracy Sejmu III kadencji” Państwo i Prawo, No. 5-6, 1963, p. 797.Google Scholar

9 Łubieński, Konstanty, “Kilka refleksji o Sejmie PRL,” Tygodnik Powszechny, June 2, 1963, p. 2.Google Scholar

10 This bill later became the statute of March 29, 1963; Dziennik Ustaw, No. 15, 1963, item 17.

11 Gebert, Stanisław, “Działalność ustawodawcza Sejmu III kadencji,” Państwo i Prawo, No. 7, 1965, p. 14.Google Scholar

12 Antoni, Maciejewski, “Czteroletni bilans Komisji Wymiaru Sprawiedliwości” Prawo i Życie, April 11, 1965, p. 5.Google Scholar

13 For example, the Judiciary Committee recommended about 500 amendments to the Code of Civil Procedure, but only 120 of them were of a substantive nature.

14 Incorporated into the statute of May 29, 1957; see Dziennik Ustaw, No. 31, 1957, item 133-

15 Incorporated into the statute of March 28, 1958; ibid., No. 18, 1958, item 76.

16 Later to become the statute of June 14, i960; ibid., No. 30, i960, item 168.

17 Later to become the statute of December 21, 1958; ibid., No. 77, 1958, item 398.

18 Later to become the statute of November 16, i960; ibid., No. 51, i960, item 300.

19 The examples are cited from Wojciech, Popkowski, “Poprawki komisji sejmo\yych do projektów ustaw w Sejmie II kadencji” Państwo i Prawo, No. 7, 1963, pp. 18–32.Google Scholar

20 Gwizdż, Andrzej, “Z zagadnień procedury parlamentarnej,” Ruch Prawniczy, Ekonomiciy Socjologiczny, No. 1, 1962, p. 1.Google Scholar

21 An interview with the Vice-Marshal of the Seym, Zenon, Kliszko, “Sejm demokracji socjalistyczncj” Nowa Kultura, Feb. 26, 1961, p. 1.Google Scholar

22 Witold, Zakrzewski, “Wpfyw Sejmu II kadencji na dzialalność prawotwórczạ Rzạdu,” Państwo i Prawo, No. 5-6, 1962, pp. 815–22.Google Scholar

23 Pol, p. 804.

24 Popkowski, p. 29.

25 For example, the debate in the Committee of Education of March 6, 1958; see Biuletyn, No. 31/163 of March 7, 1958, published by the Press Bureau of the Seym.

26 Rozmaryn, , Ustawa w Polskiej Rzeczypospolitej Ludowej (Warsaw, 1964).Google Scholar

27 Regulamin Sejmu Polskiej Rzeczypospolitej Ludowej (Warsaw, 1961), Art. 34, Par. 2.

28 Rozmaryn, p. 373.

29 Leon, Lustacz, “Monografia o ustawie” Państwo i Prawo, No. 2, 1965, p. 251.Google Scholar

30 Karl Gutzler, “Wie die Parlamente tagen,” Das Parlament, December 7, i960, p. 11.

31 Eberhard, Poppe, Der Sozialistische Abgeordnete und sein Arbeitsstil (Berlin, 1960).Google Scholar

32 Sec, for example, Makhnenko, A. Kh., “Postoiannye komissii Seima Polskoi Narodnoi Respubliki,” Sovetskoe Gosudarstvo i Pravo, No. 3, 1963, pp. 107 ff.Google Scholar

33 Pol, p. 802.

34 Beer, la. (J. Beér), Kovacs, I. (Kovács), Samel, L. (Szamel), Gosudarstvennoe Pravo Vengerskoi Narodnoi Respubliki (Moscow, 1963), p. 333.Google Scholar

35 Machnienko, Aleksander Ch., “Przemiany w działalności Rady Najwyższej ZSRR i Rad Najwyzsżych Republik Zwiạzkowych,” Państwo i Prawo, No. 6, 1961, pp. 917–30.Google Scholar