Skip to main content Accessibility help
Hostname: page-component-684bc48f8b-b5g75 Total loading time: 0.285 Render date: 2021-04-12T13:55:11.316Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": false, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true }

Article contents


Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2017

Rights & Permissions[Opens in a new window]


Critical Forum: Global Populisms
Copyright © Association for Slavic, East European, and Eurasian Studies 2017 

How do we make sense of the rise of populism across developed and developing democracies? Why are voters plumping for parties that decry elites as corrupt, democracy as ineffective, and their nations as failures? This critical forum sponsored by the Slavic Review answers these questions by ranging broadly across both post-communist countries and the developed democracies they are often told to emulate.

Populist movements share both 1) a claim to represent the “people,” rather than particular interests or cleavages and 2) a view of elites as corrupt and indifferent. The defining characteristic of populism is a claim to represent an “organic” people or nation, rather than specific interests or groups. Rather than seeing class or economic interest as the relevant cleavage, then, these parties assume that the “people” have a common shared interest, a general will that ought to be the aim of politics. Therefore, they emphasize demands for popular sovereignty and direct democracy, rather than the mediation of individual and societal interests through democratic institutions such as parliaments or parties. These commitments, once enacted, often endanger both the formal institutions and the informal norms of liberal democracy.

Beyond this shared common core, populism takes a variety of guises. There are left- and right-wing populisms, and each populist episode may have a very different logic and dynamic. As Venelin Ganev argues in his analysis of the Bulgarian ATAKA, a single party may first gain support for its xenophobic stances—only to develop a sophisticated critique of neoliberal economic policies and an argument for economic etatism. The populist rhetoric of Hungarian and Polish populists, with their emphasis on a cultural contrast between the moral and noble eponymous nations and the hollow and secular west, is a very different one. It is this chameleon-like nature of populism—its ability to articulate a variety of demands from nativism to redistribution—that makes populist arguments so appealing to many politicians, and so powerful and convincing for many supporters.

Agnieszka Pasieka takes the anthropological perspective and shows how a favorite trope of populism—far right nationalism—inhabits international spaces. Ironically, right-wing nationalists, obsessed with domestic purity and action, create transnational networks and understandings where ideas, norms, and tactics are exchanged. Putin's “populist international” may be an example, if a particularly well-funded and prominent one. Pasieka also highlights the importance of identifying precisely what it is that our polities are contending with: bandying about “populism,” “fascism,” or “alt-right” without clearly specifying what is meant only leads to conceptual confusion and political obfuscation.

Why has populism arisen? The role of labor markets, immigration, technology, and trade have all been held up as responsible. But as Abby Innes points out, one underlying cause is that well-intentioned economic reforms have led to a steady erosion of the state that precludes it from acting to benefit society—and instead makes it porous to private financial interests and the inevitable corruption that results. The quasi-market delivery of what used to be public goods, the competing logics of welfare states and market reforms, and the private financing of political campaigns are all both causes and symptoms of the new state failure. In both post-communist Europe and the advanced democracies of the United States and the United Kingdom, states can no longer meet expectations of protection and benefits—and populists promise they can deliver these goods again by narrowly defining the people who would receive them.

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Full text views reflects PDF downloads, PDFs sent to Google Drive, Dropbox and Kindle and HTML full text views.

Total number of HTML views: 99
Total number of PDF views: 442 *
View data table for this chart

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 01st August 2017 - 12th April 2021. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Access Access

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the or variations. ‘’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Available formats

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Available formats

Reply to: Submit a response

Your details

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *