Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-78dcdb465f-fqvcn Total loading time: 0.353 Render date: 2021-04-15T15:33:42.304Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": false, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true }

Article contents

Abstracts

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 May 2017

Rights & Permissions[Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Type
Abstract
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Slavic, East European, and Eurasian Studies 2017 
European Statistics, Russian Numbers, and Social Dynamics, 1861–1914
Alessandro Stanziani

Since the 18th century, the identification of social “facts” with quantities as opposed to opinion based on qualities, have been part of a large European debate about the value and meaning of statistics in social sciences. This debate took a peculiar social and political significance in post-abolitionist Russia. After recalling the main points of the historiographical debate, this paper will summarize the European debates over social facts and statistics, before moving on to Russia. It will present the debate concerning social and economic statistics among academicians, and show how it resonated in zemstva activities. It will then explain in detail how questionnaires were developed, and how space (land distribution), and time were measured. These insights will help to understand not so much statistical “errors” but rather how different actors (local priests, bureaucrats, statisticians, ethnographers) interacted with the peasantry. Discrepancies, possible convergences and mediation between different notions of time, space, wealth and health were a social and intellectual construct that had major implications for the economic and social policies to be adopted.

Dissimulation and Memory in Early Modern Poland-Lithuania: the Art of Forgetting
Maria Ivanova
Michelle R. Viise

The sixteenth and seventeenth centuries have been called the “age of dissimulation.” This article argues that the art of dissimulation (ars dissimulandi) was not only a Machiavellian institution for escaping persecution or gaining reward, but also a discursive technique and means of organizing a narrative. Dissimulation is analyzed in the context of rhetoric, especially the art of memory, with special emphasis given to its peculiar manifestation in the writings of early modern Ruthenians (the Orthodox, Protestant, and Greek Catholic residents of the Commonwealth of Poland-Lithuania living in the areas of modern-day Ukraine and Belarus), including Meletii Smotryts'kyi, Lavrentii and Stefan Zyzanii, and Kyrylo Trankvilion Stavrovets'kyi. The study of dissimulation among Ruthenians reveals a tradition of thinking that balanced absence and presence and engendered the development of a modern art of oblivion that accommodated conflicting ideas and quietly relaxed the hegemony of canonical theology on thought to make room for scientific speculation.

From All Sides: Interdisciplinary Knowledge, Scientific Collaboration, and the Soviet Criminological Laboratories of the 1920s
Kenneth Pinnow

The Bolshevik regime opened the prisons for scientific study and administration, ushering in a vigorous period of criminological investigations during the 1920s. Epitomized by the State Institute for the Study of Crime and the Criminal and a series of regional criminological centers, these efforts sought to unify the human and social sciences (medicine, psychiatry, anthropology, psychology, and sociology) in the search for an “all-sided” understanding of criminality. This article treats Soviet criminological research as a problem in the history of interdisciplinary knowledge. It argues that the boundlessness of Soviet socialism, which made everyone and everything open to scrutiny, created an environment that was conducive to the totalizing potentials already contained in modern criminological discourse. In particular, the State Institute and studies of the criminal personality became spaces that promoted collaboration as an answer to the challenges of modernity. Although the disciplines involved remained largely intact, early Soviet criminology reinforces the fact that the boundaries of scientific knowledge and practice are not natural and fixed but rather the products of history, politics, ideology, culture, individual choices, and other contingencies.

Nabokov’s The Gift, Dostoevskii, and the Tradition of Narrative Ambiguity
Stephen H. Blackwell

The essay examines the epistemological implications of narrative voice, specifically in the context of Nabokov’s The Gift (and its spin-off, “The Circle”) in relation to the elusive narrator of Dostoevskii’s The Double, with a brief glance at Pushkin’s Eugene Onegin. Dostoevskii created a highly elusive narrator who blurs the boundaries of the real and the fantastic; The Gift follows in this tradition, drawing on some of Dostoevskii’s techniques and adding new ones. The two authors take differing approaches to the problem of knowledge, as implied by their narrators: Dostoevskii’s deals primarily with epistemological problems presented by madness, and only by implication with problems of knowledge more generally. Nabokov’s novel, deeply interested in the question of “knowing” the world, creates a narrator who may be identified in (at least) two ways: there is still no consensus on whether Fyodor Godunov-Cherdyntsev is best considered to have authored the entire text before us, or whether, instead, a fictitious author-figure hovers silently above him and gives the novel its final inner shape. This article reviews some of the challenges attending each of the major solutions to date and suggests that, after all, the “open” solution is the most apt, arguing that the novel possesses a new type of narrator that may be called “multistable.” The novel thus performs the difficulty of achieving true knowledge about the world; it does this by highlighting the contingency of even the most basic features of narrative.

Social Media and EuroMaidan: A Review Essay
Megan MacDuffee Metzger
Joshua A. Tucker

We provide a comprehensive summary of what is known to date about the usage of social media during the EuroMaidan protests. We ground this assessment in existing social science theoretical work related to the phenomenon of political protest, suggesting three important mechanisms by which social media could impact protest participation and development: by providing tools for organizing protests; by facilitating the spread of information related to protests; and by building networks that could sustain the protest movement. We then explore the evidence to date in each of these areas. Based on this assessment, we close by proposing a forward looking research agenda that will speak to better understanding of the role of social media in the EuroMaidan protests specifically, the role of social media in protests movements more generally, and how to harness the unique opportunities presented by the fact that much of social media usage is digitally archived and therefore available for scholarly analysis.

Full text views

Full text views reflects PDF downloads, PDFs sent to Google Drive, Dropbox and Kindle and HTML full text views.

Total number of HTML views: 43
Total number of PDF views: 137 *
View data table for this chart

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 02nd May 2017 - 15th April 2021. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

You have Access

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Abstracts
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Abstracts
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Abstracts
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response


Your details


Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *