Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-sh8wx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-22T00:25:22.108Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Critical Review

Review products

How not to Network a Nation: The Uneasy History of the Soviet Internet. By BenjaminPeters. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 2016. xiii, 298 pp. Appendixes. Notes. Bibliography. Glossary. Photos. $38.00, hard bound.

Liberal.ru: Internet i ideologicheskie dvizheniia v Rossii: Kollektivnaia monografia. Ed G.Nikiporets-Takigava and E.Pain. Moscow: Novoe Literaturnoe Obozrenie, 2016. 478 pp. Appendixes. Notes. Photographs. Figures. Tables. RUB 494, hard bound.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 May 2017

Ellen Mickiewicz*
Affiliation:
Duke University

Extract

In two important books, Runet (the Russian internet) is the central character, an essential component of the politics of commerce, economic policy, and strategic thinking. The first, written by an American specialist on information policy and the interaction between society and technology, looks back to the Soviet era, at the prescience and then failure of top Soviet scientists to introduce the networked society ahead of their American counterparts. The second is a collaborative work of Russian social scientists with an extensive agenda to identify, using discourse analysis, the principal political groups posting in “communities” of the like-minded in “VKontakte,” a large heterogeneous social media site combining personal interactions and extensive blogs within self-organized “communities.” The second half of this book differs substantially: Lev Gudkov, senior analyst at the Levada Center in Moscow, looks at the country as a whole through a different lens—a large number of national surveys gathered over the course of the Center’s activity. The first book chronicles the ambitious proposal by leading scientists to network the whole country in the service of the Soviet Union’s ideologically-based command economy. The second reveals a country riven by multiple, mutually incompatible ideologies espousing “anti” or negative platforms with little ideological heft until Vladimir Putin’s campaign to arouse a nationalist or, as the book puts it, an “imperialist syndrome” with the “return” of Crimea.

Type
Critical Review
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Slavic, East European, and Eurasian Studies 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Approval questions in Russian surveys vary in their wording. The data to which Gudkov refers are taken from national surveys from 2001–1014, in response to the question: “With what words would you mark your attitude to V. Putin?” (336):AdmirationLikeI can’t say anything bad about himNeutral, indifferentSuspiciousI can’t say anything good about him.Antipathy, Disgust(not reported are no answer, which varies little, from 1–3%).