Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-pftt2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-29T02:43:48.925Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Comment: Divides and Ends–The Problem of Periodization

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 January 2017

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Forum: Divides and Ends Periodizing the Early Modern in Russian History
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Slavic, East European, and Eurasian Studies. 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Ortner's, Sherry B. classic article still holds value: “Theory in Anthropology since the Sixties,Comparative Studies in Society and History 26, no. 1 (January 1984): 126-66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

2. Just a few recent discussions: Berkhofer, Richard F. Jr, Beyond the Great Story: History as Text and Discourse (Cambridge, Mass., 1995)Google Scholar; Baker, Robert S., “History and Periodization,Clio 26, no. 2 (Winter 1997): 135-41Google Scholar; Prasenjit Duara, “Why Is History Antitheoretical?“ Modern China24, no. 2 (April 1998): 105–20;James Clifford, “On Ethnographic Authority,” The Predicament of Culture: Tiuentieth-Century Ethnography, Literature, and Art (Cambridge, Mass., 1988), 21–54.

3. Topolski, Jerzy, “Periodization and the Creation of the Narrative Wholes,Sloria delta Storiografiia 37 (2000): 11–16.Google Scholar

4. Martin, Russell E., “Gifts for the Bride: Dowries, Diplomacy and Marriage Politics in Muscovy,Journal ojMedieval and Early Modern Studies 38, no. 1 (Winter 2008): 131.Google Scholar

5. Kliuchevskii, V. O., “Kurs russkoi istorii,” in his Sochineniia, 8 vols. (Moscow, 1956-59), 2:198.Google Scholar

6. See this argument in Pavel Miliukov's introduction to the final edition of his threevolume history: “Vvedenie,” Ocherki po istorii russkoi kul'tury v 3-kh tomakh (1937; Moscow, 1993), vol. l,pt. 1.

7. Wesling, Donald, “Michel Serres, Bruno Latour, and the Edges of Historical Periods,Clio 26, no. 2 (Winter 1997): 189–204.Google Scholar

8. This list only touches the surface of a rich literature on the eighteenth century. E. V Anisimov, Dyba i knut: Politicheskii sysk i russkoe obshchestvo v XVIII v. (Moscow, 1999); Kamenskii, Aleksandr B., Povsednevnost’ russkikh gorodskikh obyvatelei: Istoricheskie anekdoty iz provintsial'noi zhizni XVIII veka (Moscow, 2006)Google Scholar; Lavrov, A. S., Koldovstvo i religiia v Rossii: 1700–1740 gg. (Moscow, 2000)Google Scholar; Marasinova, E. N., Psikhologiia elity rossiiskogo dvorianstva poslednei treti XVIII veka: Po materialam perepiski (Moscow, 1999)Google Scholar; Marker, Gary J., Publishing, Printing, and the Origins of Intellectual Life in Russia, 1700–1800 (Princeton, 1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Michelle Lamarche Marrese, A Woman's Kingdom: Noblewomen and the Control of Property in Russia, 1700–1861 (Ithaca, 2002); Boris Nikolaevich Mironov, Sotsial'naia istoriia Rossii perioda imperii: XVIII-nachalo XXv.: Genezis lichnosti, demokraticheskoi sem'i, grazhdanskogo obshchestua i pravovogo gosudarstva (St. Petersburg, 1999); Smilianskaia, E. B., Volshebniki, bogokhul'niki, eretiki: Narodnaia religioznost’ i “dukhovnye prestupleniia” v Rossii XVIII v. (Moscow, 2003)Google Scholar; Douglas Smith, Working the Rough Stone: Freemasonry and Society in Eighteenth- Century Russia (DeKalb, 1999); Cynthia Hyla Whittaker, Russian Monarchy: Eighteenth-Century Rulers and Writers in Political Dialogue (DeKalb, 2003); Elise Kimerling Wirtschafter, The Play of Ideas in Russian Enlightenment Theater (DeKalb, 2003).

9. Marc Raeff, Understanding Imperial Russia: State and Society in the Old Regime, trans. Arthur Goldhammer (New York, 1984), chap. 2; Cracraft, James, The Revolution of Peter the Great (Cambridge, Mass., 2003).Google Scholar