Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-q6k6v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-10T18:27:56.456Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Between authorial intent and indeterminacy: the incarnation as an invitation to human–divine discourse

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 August 2005

Tim Meadowcroft
Affiliation:
Bible College of New Zealand, Private Bag 93104, Henderson, Waitakere City, New Zealandtimm@bcnz.ac.nz

Abstract

There has been a range of philosophical and linguistic responses to the phenomenon of indeterminacy and the place of authorial intention in the hermeneutical task. In the face of these responses, others have developed various theological responses to the problem, responses which this paper refers to collectively as ‘believing criticism’. A theological undergirding for all such approaches may be found in the application of the incarnation to an understanding not only of the nature of the Christian scriptures but also of the interpretative process itself. This application enhances our appreciation of the role both of divine intention in the divine discourse evident in the Bible and of the contextualised response to that discourse, and provides further impetus for those who would argue that both intention and indeterminacy must be recognised in the apprehension of meaning. This is in tune with an epistemology of ‘personal knowledge’ as espoused by Michael Polanyi.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© Scottish Journal of Theology Ltd 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

I am grateful both to my colleague Dr John Roxborogh for a number of helpful suggestions made in the formation of this paper, and to members of the TGST Postgraduate Seminar who heard and commented on an earlier version.