No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Analogical Thinking in Theology
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 02 February 2009
Extract
Karl barth's emphasis on the Analogia Fidei, and the revival of interest in the Analogia Entis, both point up our contemporary concern about the place of analogical thinking in theology. A number of developments outside the field of theology proper also contribute to this concern about analogical thinking. A brief consideration of some of these developments may help to clarify one aspect of the significance of the Analogia Fidei.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Scottish Journal of Theology Ltd 1964
References
page 279 note 1 McIntyre, J., ‘Analogy’, S.J.T., XII, p. I.Google Scholar
page 281 note 1 Baillie, J., Our Knowledge of God (Charles Scribner's Sons, 1939), p. 201.Google Scholar
page 282 note 1 Farrer, A. M., Finite and Infinite (Dacre Press, 1943), p. 23.Google Scholar
page 282 note 2 Casserly, J. V. Langmead, The Christian in Philosophy (Charles Scribner's Sons, 1951), Part II, Ch. 6.Google Scholar
page 283 note 1 Wittgenstein, L., Philosophical Investigations (Basil Blackwell, 1953), quotations from sections 65 and 67.Google Scholar
page 283 note 2 See Bruner, J. S.Goodnow, J. J. and Austin, G. A., A Study of Thinking (John Wiley and Sons, 1956), for discussion of this.Google Scholar
page 284 note 1 SirBartlett, F., Thinking (Basic Books Inc., 1958), p. 75.Google Scholar
page 285 note 1 Emmett, D. M., The Nature of Metaphysical Thinking (Macmillan and Co., 1949). P. 6.Google Scholar
page 285 note 2 Schiller, F. C. S., Formal Logic (Macmillan and Co., 1931), p. 342.Google Scholar
page 285 note 3 See, for example, Rogers, C. R., Counselling and Psychotherapy, (Houghton Miffin, 1942), p. 30Google Scholar; Whitaker, C. A. and Malone, T. P., The Roots of Psychotherapy (Blakiston Co., 1953), p. 62.Google Scholar
page 286 note 1 The American psychologist. Vol. X, no. 7. July 1955. Italics in original.Google Scholar
page 287 note 1 This term was used more than a quarter of a century ago by Pepper, S. C. in an article entitled ‘The Root Metaphor Theory of Metaphysics’, Journal of Philosophy, XXXII, July 1935.Google Scholar
page 288 note 1 Barth, K., Church Dogmatics. Vol. II, Pt. I. (T. and T. Clark, Edinburgh, 1957). P. 85.Google Scholar
page 288 note 2 ibid. p. 79.
page 288 note 3 Barth, K., Church Dogmatics. Vol. I, Pt. II. (T. and T. Clark, Edinburgh, 1956), P. 297.Google Scholar
page 288 note 4 Barth, K., Church Dogmatics. Vol. IV, Pt. II. (T. and T. Clark, Edinburgh, 1958), p. 58.Google Scholar