Hostname: page-component-68945f75b7-9klrw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-05T22:32:30.709Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Desired Machines: Cinema and the World in Its Own Image

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 July 2011

Jimena Canales
Jimena Canales*
Affiliation:
Harvard University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Argument

In 1895 when the Lumière brothers unveiled their cinematographic camera, many scientists were elated. Scientists hoped that the machine would fulfill a desire that had driven research for nearly half a century: that of capturing the world in its own image. But their elation was surprisingly short-lived, and many researchers quickly distanced themselves from the new medium. The cinematographic camera was soon split into two machines, one for recording and one for projecting, enabling it to further escape from the laboratory. The philosopher Henri Bergson joined scientists, such as Etienne-Jules Marey, who found problems with the new cinematographic order. Those who had worked to make the dream come true found that their efforts had been subverted. This essay focuses on the desire to build a cinematographic camera, with the purpose of elucidating how dreams and reality mix in the development of science and technology. It is about desired machines and their often unexpected results. The interplay between what “is” (the technical), what “ought” (the ethical), and what “could” be (the fantastical) drives scientific research.

Type
Research Article
Information
Science in Context , Volume 24 , Issue 3: Cinematography, Seriality, and the Sciences , September 2011 , pp. 329 - 359
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adorno, Theodor. [1952] 1981. In Search of Wagner. Translated by Livingstone, Rodney. London: NLB.Google Scholar
Andriopoulos, Stefan. 2005. “Psychic Television.” Critical Inquiry 31:618–637.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Banet-Rivet, Pierre. 1907. “La Représentation du mouvement et de la vie.” Revue des deux mondes 40:590–621.Google Scholar
Bazin, André. [1946] 2005. “The Myth of Total Cinema.” In What is Cinema? Translated by Gray, Hugh, 17–22. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Bergson, Henri. [1901] 1972. “Le parallélisme psycho-physique et la métaphysique positive.” In Mélanges, 463–502. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Bergson, Henri. [1922] 1972. “Durée et simultanéité: a propos de la théorie d'Einstein.” In Mélanges, 58–244. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Bergson, Henri. [1934] 1991. “La Pensée et le mouvant.” In Oeuvres, 1251–1482. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Bergson, Henri. 1998. Creative Evolution. Mineola NY: Dover.Google Scholar
Bernstein, Aaron. 1873–1874. Naturwissenschaftliche Volksbücher. Berlin: Dümmler.Google Scholar
Biagioli, Mario. 2006. Galileo's Instruments of Credit: Telescopes, Images, Secrecy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biagioli, Mario and Peter, Galison, eds. 2003. Scientific Authorship: Credit and Intellectual Property in Science. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Braun, Marta. 1992. Picturing Time: The Work of Etienne-Jules Marey (1830–1904). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Canales, Jimena. 2006. “Movement before Cinematography: The High-Speed Qualities of Sentiment.” Journal of Visual Culture 5 (3):275–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clausberg, Karl. 2008. “A Microscope for Time: What Benjamin and Klages, Einstein and the Movies Owe to Distant Stars.” In Given World and Time, edited by Miller, Tyrus, 297–358. Budapest: Central European University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coissac, Michel G. 1925. Histoire du cinématographe. Paris: Éditions du “Cinéopse.”Google Scholar
Crary, Jonathan. 1998. “Attention and Modernity in the Nineteenth Century.” In Picturing Science, Producing Art, edited by Caroline, A. Jones and Galison, Peter, 475–499. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Crary, Jonathan. 1999. Suspensions of Perception: Attention, Spectacle, and Modern Culture. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cuyer, Edouard. 1883. Allures du cheval démontrées a l'aide d'une planche coloriée, découpée, superposée et articulée. Paris: J.-B. Baillière et fils.Google Scholar
Deleuze, Gilles. 1986. Cinema 1: The Movement-Image. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deleuze, Gilles and Félix, Guattari. 1972. L'Anti-Oedipe. Paris: Les Editions de Minuit.Google Scholar
Demeny, Gilles. 1899. “Études sur les appareils chronophotographiques.” L'année psychologique 5:347–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eberty, Felix George Friedrich. [1846] 1882. The Stars and the Earth; or, Thoughts upon Space, Time and Eternity. Boston: Lee and Shepard Publishers.Google Scholar
Einstein, Albert. [1949] 1991. “Autobiographical Notes.” In Albert Einstein: Philosopher-Scientist, edited by Schilpp, Paul Arthur, 2–94. La Salle IL: Open Court.Google Scholar
Fabre, Charles. n.d. Les industries photographiques. Paris: Gauthier-Villars.Google Scholar
Faye, Hervé. 1849. “Sur les observations du soleil.” Comptes rendus des séances de l'Académie des Sciences 28;241–244.Google Scholar
Faye, Hervé. 1854. “Sur la différence de longitude entre Paris et Londres. Discours de réception.” In Mémoires de l'Académie de Stanislas, v-xviii.Google Scholar
Faye, Hervé. 1858. “Sur le photographies de l'éclipse du 15 mars, présentées par MM. Porro et Quinet,” Comptes rendus des séances de l'Académie des Sciences 46:705–710.Google Scholar
Faye, Hervé, 31 October 1861, Preußische Staatsbibliothek zu Berlin, Sammlung Darmstädter I 1846(6) Faye, 3.Google Scholar
Faye, Hervé. 1863. “Réponse à une inculpation de M. Le Verrier relativement à la part que M. Faye a prise à la détermination de la différence de longitude entre Londres et Paris.” Comptes rendus des séances de l'Académie des Sciences 56:154–158.Google Scholar
Faye, Hervé. 1864. “Sur les erreurs d'origine physiologique.” Comptes rendus des séances de l'Académie des Sciences 59:473–480.Google Scholar
Faye, Hervé. 1881. Cours d'astronomie de l'École polytechnique. Paris: Gauthier-Villars.Google Scholar
Faye, Hervé. 1883. Cours d'astronomie et de géodésie de l'École polytechnique. Paris: Gauthier-Villars.Google Scholar
Feynman, Richard Phillips. 1965. The Character of Physical Law. London: BBC.Google Scholar
Flammarion, Camille. 1873. Stories of Infinity: Lumen; History of a Comet; In Infinity. Boston: Roberts Brothers.Google Scholar
Galison, Peter and Jones, Caroline A.. 2001. “Trajectories of Production: Laboratories, Factories, Studios.” Laboratorium, edited by Ulrich Obrist, Hans and Vanderlinden, Barbara, 205–210. Cologne: Dumont.Google Scholar
Gastine, Louis. n.d. “Nouvelles modifications du chronophotographe par M. E. J. Marey.” In La chronophotographie. Paris: Gauthier-Villars.Google Scholar
Giedion, Siegfried. 1948. Mechanization Takes Command: A Contribution to Anonymous History. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Grimoin-Sanson, Raoul. 1923. Cinéopse 48 (August).Google Scholar
Janssen, Jules. 1876. “Bulletin des sociétés savantes, Académie des sciences de Paris.- 2 Octobre 1876: Observations sur les passages devant le soleil de corps intra-mercuriels.” Revue scientifique 18 (14 October): 383.Google Scholar
Janssen, Jules. 1883. “Les progrès de la astronomie physique.” L'Astronomie: Revue mensuelle d'astronomie populaire, de météorologie et de physique du globe 2 (4):121–128.Google Scholar
Janssen, Jules. 1888a. “La photographie céleste.” Revue scientifique 33 (14 January).Google Scholar
Janssen, Jules. 1888b. La Photographie céleste, conférence faite au Congrès de Toulouse. Paris: Administration de deux revues.Google Scholar
Kirk, Geoffrey Stephen and Raven, John Earle. 1957. The Presocratic Philosophers: A Critical History with a Selection of Texts. Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kittler, Friedrich. 1990. Discourse Networks 1800/1900. Stanford: Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kittler, Friedrich. 1999. Gramophone, Film, Typewriter. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Kittler, Friedrich A. 2010. Optical Media: Berlin Lectures 1999. Cambridge UK: Polity.Google Scholar
Koselleck, Reinhart Urbain. 2004. Futures Past: On the Semantics of Historical Time. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Le Verrier, Urbain. 1876. “Bulletin des sociétés savantes, Académie des sciences de Paris.- 2 Octobre 1876: Les planètes intra-mercurielles.” Revue scientifique 18 (14 October): 383.Google Scholar
Lee, H. D. P. 1936. Zeno of Elea: A Text. Cambridge UK:Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lyotard, Jean-François. 1999. “A Postmodern Fable.” In Postmodern Fables, by Lyotard, Jean-François, 83–102. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Mair, Francis. 1905. “Débuts du cinématographe.” Phono-Ciné-Gazette.Google Scholar
Marey, Etienne-Jules. 1882. “Sur la reproduction, par la photographie, des diverses phases du vol des oiseaux.” Comptes rendus des séances de l'Académie des Sciences 94 (13 March):683–684.Google Scholar
Marey, Etienne-Jules. 1888. “Modifications de la Photo-chronographie pour l'analyse des movements exécutés sur place par un animal.” Comptes rendus de l'Académie des sciences 107:607–609.Google Scholar
Marey, Etienne-Jules. 1889. “La photochronographie et ses applications à l'analyse des phénomènes physiologiques.” Archives de physiologie normale et pathologique, publiées par MM. Brown-Séquard, Charcot, Vulpian 1:508–612.Google Scholar
Marey, Etienne-Jules. 1894. Le Mouvement. Paris: G. Masson.Google Scholar
Marey, Étienne-Jules. 1899. Préface. La photographie animée. Paris: Gauthiers-Villars.Google Scholar
Marey, Etienne-Jules. 1902. “The History of Chronophotography.” Annual Report of the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution, showing the operations, expenditures, and condition of the Institution for the year ending June 30, 1901, 317–340.Google Scholar
Münsterberg, Hugo. 1916. Photoplay. New York: Appleton.Google Scholar
Obrist, Hans Ulrich and Vanderlinden, Barbara, eds. 2001. Laboratorium. Cologne: Dumont.Google Scholar
Olivier, Louis. 1882. “Physiologie: La photographie du mouvement.” Revue scientifique 30:802–811.Google Scholar
Pang, Alex Soojung-Kim. 1997. “’Stars Should Henceforth Register Themselves’: Astrophotography at the Early Lick Observatory.” British Journal for the History of Science 30:177–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pohle, Joseph. 1885. Die Sternwelten und ihre Bewohner. Eine wissenschaftliche Studie über die Bewohnbarkeit und die Belebtheit der Himmelskörper nach dem neuesten Standpunkte der Wissenschaften. Cologne: Bachem.Google Scholar
Popper, Karl R. and Bartley, William Warren. 1982. The Open Universe: An Argument for Indeterminism. Totowa NJ: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Ruyer, Raymond. 1936. “Le Sens du temps. Réflexions sur des films renversés.” Recherches philosophiques 52–64.Google Scholar
Sadoul, Georges. 1972. Histoire du cinéma mondial. Des origines à nos jours. Paris: Flammarion.Google Scholar
Schaffer, Simon. 1992. “Late Victorian Metrology and Its Instrumentation: A Manufactory of Ohms.” In Invisible Connections, Instruments, Institutions and Science, edited by Bud, Robert and Cozzens, Susan, 23–56. Bellingham: SPIE Optical Engineering Press.Google Scholar
Secord, Anne. 2002. “Botany on a Plate: Pleasure and the Power of Pictures in Promoting Early Nineteenth-Century Scientific Knowledge.” Isis 93:28–57.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Simondon, Gilbert. 1958. Du mode d'existence des objets techniques. Paris: Aubier-Montaigne.Google Scholar
Snyder, Joel. 1998. “Visualization and Visibility.” In Picturing Science, Producing Art, edited by Jones, Caroline A. and Galison, Peter, 379–397. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Thibault, Ghislain. 2010. “Éthéréalisation: amorces d'une contre-histoire.” Ph.D. diss., Département de communication, Université de Montréal, Canada.Google Scholar
Thomson, William. 1874. “Kinetic Theory of the Dissipation of Energy.” Nature 441–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tiphaigne de la Roche, Charles-François. 1760. Giphantie. A Babylone (Paris: Nicolas-François Moreau).Google Scholar
Trutat, Eugène. 1899a. Dix leçons de photographie. Cours professé au Muséum de Toulouse. Paris: Gauthier-Villars.Google Scholar
Trutat, Eugène. 1899b. La photographie animée. Paris: Gauthiers-Villars.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vitoux, Georges. 1896. La Photographie du mouvement. Paris: Chamuel.Google Scholar
Vlès, Fred. c.1914. La Cinématographie Astronomique. Paris: Charles Mendel.Google Scholar