Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-8kt4b Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-22T14:59:16.180Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

War and its Bestiality: Animals and their Fate during the Fighting in France, 1940

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 March 2014

MARTIN S. ALEXANDER
MARTIN S. ALEXANDER*
Affiliation:
Department of International Politics, Aberystwyth University, Penglais, Aberystwyth, Ceredigion, SY23 3FE, Wales, UKmartin_alexander@hotmail.co.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The fighting in France and Belgium in May-June 1940 has generated a large literature. Mostly, however, this has concerned itself with military strategy, the triumph of the German operational methods popularly termed ‘Blitzkrieg’, the British evacuation at Dunkirk and the political consequences of defeat for the French. This article re-evaluates the mobilisation of 1939 and the conduct of combat operations in 1940 from a less conventional perspective: that of the animals in France. It explores what happened to the many domestic pets swept up, or left behind, in the flight of Belgian and French civilians southward to escape the invader; the livestock on the farmland of the Somme, Aisne, Oise and Meuse where the battles raged; and the horses which remained central to the transport of men, munitions and supplies on both the French and German sides. It argues that the recovery of the wartime experiences of the fauna of France should be part of a more holistic understanding of war's impact on the natural world and on all, non-humans as well as humans, who inhabit it.

Type
Research Article
Information
Rural History , Volume 25 , Issue 1 , April 2014 , pp. 101 - 124
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Notes

1. Excellent starting points into work on environmental history, not explicitly focused on war's impact on the natural world and its non-human inhabitants, are: Hughes, J. Donald, What is Environmental History? (Cambridge, 2011)Google Scholar; Thomas, Keith, Man and the Natural World: A History of the Modern Sensibility, 1500–1800 (New York, 1983)Google Scholar; ‘A Round Table: Environmental History’, Journal of American History, 76:1 (March 1990), 1087–1147; Williams, Michael, ‘The Relations of Environmental History and Historical Geography’, Journal of Historical Geography, 20:1 (January 1994), 3–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Bess, Michael, Cioc, Mark and Sievert, James, ‘Environmental History Writing in Southern Europe’, Environmental History, 5:4 (October 2000), 545–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar. For specific research projects and directions see: Woolner, David B. and Henderson, Henry L., eds, FDR and the Environment (Basingstoke, 2009)Google Scholar; Blackbourn, David, The Conquest of Nature: Water, Landscape and the Making of Modern Germany (New York, 2007)Google Scholar; Ritvo, Harriet, The Dawn of Green: Manchester, Thirlmere and Modern Environmentalism (Chicago and London, 2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Rootes, Christopher, ‘Environmentalism: Environmental NGOs and the Environmental Movement in England’, in Crowson, Nick, Hilton, Matthew, McKay, James, eds, NGOs in Contemporary Britain: Non-State Actors in Society and Politics since 1945 (Basingstoke, 2009), pp. 201–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar. See also two special issues of one of France's leading historical journals: ‘Histoire environnementale’, Revue d'Histoire Moderne et Contemporaine, 56:4 (December 2009); ‘Climat et histoire, XVIe – XIXe siècles’, Revue d'Histoire Moderne et Contemporaine, 57:3 (October 2010).

2. Examples include Pearson, Chris, Coates, Peter, Cole, Tim, eds, Militarized Landscapes: From Gettysburg to Salisbury Plain (London, 2010)Google Scholar; Lorcin, Patricia M. E. and Brewer, Daniel, eds, France and its Spaces of War: Experience, Memory, Image (Basingstoke, 2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar, although the battleground of the Low Countries and France in 1939–40 is absent from the case studies in these books. cf. Foot, William, Beaches, Fields, Streets and Hills: The Anti-Invasion Landscapes of England, 1940 (Council for British Archaeology, 2006)Google Scholar.

3. Further works that contributed to the subject's growth are: McNeill, John R., Something New Under the Sun: An Environmental History of the Twentieth-Century World (New York, 2000)Google Scholar; Cronon, William, Changes in the Land: Indians, Colonists and the Ecology of New England (New York, 2003)Google Scholar; Richards, John F., The Unending Frontier: An Environmental History of the Early Modern World (Berkeley, CA. and London, 2006)Google Scholar; Miller, Shawn William, An Environmental History of Latin America (Cambridge, 2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

4. For examples see Jackson, Jeffrey H., Paris under Water: How the City of Light Survived the Great Flood of 1910 (Basingstoke.: Palgrave Macmillan, 2010)Google Scholar; Moon, David, ‘The Environmental History of the Russian Steppes: Vasilii Dokuchaev and the Harvest Failure of 1891’, Transactions of the Royal Historical Society, Sixth Ser., XV (Cambridge, 2005), 149–74Google Scholar.

5. Works that illustrate and themselves advanced the trend include: McPhee, Peter, The Politics of Rural Life (Oxford, 1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; McPhee, Peter, Revolution and Environment in Southern France, 1780–1830: Peasants, Lords and Murder in the Corbières (Oxford, 1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar, chapters. 1, 5 and 7; Whited, Tamara L., Forests and Peasant Politics in Modern France (New Haven, CT and London, 2000)Google Scholar; Pearson, Chris, ‘“The Age of Wood”: Fuel and Fighting in French Forests, 1940–1944’, Environmental History, 11 (October 2006), 775–803Google Scholar; Pearson, Chris, ‘A “Watery Desert” in Vichy France: The Environmental History of the Camargue Wetlands, 1940–1944’, French Historical Studies, 32:3 (Summer 2009), 479–509Google Scholar; McNeill, John R., Mosquito Empires: Ecology and War in the Greater Caribbean, 1620–1914 (Cambridge, 2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Gardiner, Juliet, The Animals’ War: Animals in Wartime from the First World War to the Present Day (London, 2007)Google Scholar.

6. A pioneering work was Delort, Robert's Les animaux ont une histoire (Paris, 1984)Google Scholar; for other treatments of French experiences within an environmental history paradigm, see Ford, Caroline, ‘Landscape and Environment in French Historical and Geographical Thought: New Directions’, French Historical Studies, 24:1 (Winter 2001), 125–34Google Scholar; Beck, Corinne and Delort, Robert, eds, Pour une histoire de l'environnement: Travaux du programme interdisciplinaire de recherche sur l'environnement (Paris, 1993)Google Scholar.

7. See Mangum, Teresa, ‘Narrative Dominion, or the Animals Write Back? Animal Genres in Literature and the Arts’, in Kete, Kathleen, ed., A Cultural History of Animals in the Age of Empire (Oxford, 2009)Google Scholar, chapter 7.

8. Milestone, Lewis, Director, All Quiet on the Western Front (Universal Pictures, 1930)Google Scholar.

9. Call for Papers, ‘Wanted, Dead or Alive: Critical Geographies of Human-Animal Encounters’, RGS-IBG Conference, 3–5 July 2012, at http://animal-geography.blogspot.co.uk/ (accessed 21 July 2012); and a Call for Proposals for contributions to the Oxford University Press journal French History special issue devoted to ‘Animals in French History’ (guest editors Peter Sahlins, University of California: Berkeley, and Chris Pearson, University of Liverpool), distributed electronically via H-France [h-france@lists.uakron.edu], 12 Sept. 2012.

10. J. R. McNeill, ‘Forests and Warfare in World History’ http://www.scribd.com/doc/1035197/Forests-and-Warfare-in-World-History (accessed 30 June 2012).

11. Clout, Hugh, After the Ruins: Restoring the Countryside of Northern France after the Great War (Exeter, 1996)Google Scholar; cf. Arnat, Jean-Paul, ‘Le rôle stratégique de la forêt, 1871–1914: Exemples dans les forêts de Lorraine’, Revue historique des armées, 1 (1993), 62–9Google Scholar; McNeill, ‘Forests and Warfare’; Pearson ‘“Age of Wood”’.

12. McNeill, ‘Forests and Warfare’, p. 22.

13. Carl von Clausewitz, On War, translation and introduction by Peter Paret and Sir Michael Howard (Princeton, NJ, 1976), pp. 469–83; Pearson, Chris, ‘Creating the Natural Fortress: Landscape, Resistance and memory in the Vercors, France’, in Closmann, Charles, ed., War and the Environment (College Station, TX, 2009), pp. 150–76Google Scholar.

14. The pace of the German advance repeatedly exceeded the capacity of French army engineer and demolition detachments to wire and detonate explosive charges to destroy all the road, rail and foot bridges, as well as weirs, across the watercourses along which French troops were improvising defences to stop the enemy.

15. Wiedmann, H. and Gehring, E., eds, Die grüne Hölle von Inor (Munich, 1941)Google Scholar; on armed combat and Resistance in the French forests later in the war, in 1943–44, see Pearson, ‘“Age of Wood”’, pp. 792–3.

16. Hadley, P., Third Class to Dunkirk: A Worm's-Eye View of the BEF, 1940 (London, 1944), pp. 58–9Google Scholar.

17. Arguably and paradoxically, the 1939–45 conflict produced more profound effects on British agricultural practices and land usage, although no ground fighting occurred on British soil. See Short, Brian, Watkins, Charles, Martin, John, eds, The Front Line of Freedom: British Farming in the Second World War (British Agricultural History Society, 2006)Google Scholar.

18. Sadoul, Georges, Journal de guerre. 2 septembre 1939 – 20 juillet 1940 (Paris, 1977), pp. 294–8Google Scholar.

19. See Neave, Airey, The Flames of Calais: A Soldier's Battle, 1940 (London, 1972)Google Scholar; Atkin, Ronald, Pillar of Fire: Dunkirk 1940 (Edinburgh, 2000)Google Scholar.

20. Werth, Alexander, The Last Days of Paris (London, 1940), pp. 122–5, 127–8Google Scholar; Lottman, Herbert R., The Fall of Paris (London, 1992), pp. 186–7Google Scholar.

21. cf. Call for papers for the conference: ‘Cosmopolitan Animals’, Institute of English Studies, University of London (26–27 October 2012), at http://www.kent.ac.uk/history/events/documents/Cosmopolitan-Animals-CFP1.pdf (accessed 21 July 2012).

22. Freeman, C. Denis and Cooper, Douglas, The Road to Bordeaux (London, 1940), pp. 16–17Google Scholar.

23. Kete, K., The Beast in the Boudoir: Pets and Pet-keeping in Paris (Berkeley, 1994)Google Scholar, especially chapters 1 and 3; cf. Ritvo, Harriet, The Animal Estate: The English and Other Creatures in the Victorian Age (Cambridge, MA, 1989)Google Scholar.

24. Sieburg, F., Is God a Frenchman? Or the Gospel of St Joan. A German Study of France in the Modern World (London and Toronto, 1931), p. 86Google Scholar.

25. Freeman and Cooper, The Road to Bordeaux, p. 87.

26. M. Morpurgo, ‘Horses are beautiful. But also stupid’, The Times (Saturday Review), 25th February 2012, p. 15.

27. Najafi, Sina and Kete, Kathleen, ‘Beastly Agendas: An interview with Kathleen Kete’, in Cabinet, 4 (Fall 2001)Google Scholar.

28. Edmonds, Andrew S. and Cutter, Susan L., ‘Planning for Pet Evacuations during Disasters’, Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management, 5:1 (2008), 1–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar, 1; I am grateful to Professor A. J. Hinks for drawing this article to my attention

29. Diamond, Hanna, Fleeing Hitler: France 1940 (Oxford, 2007), pp. 15–25Google Scholar; also Nicole Risser, Dombrowski, France under Fire. German Invasion, Civilian Flight and Family Survival in World War II (Cambridge, 2012), pp. 39–40, 43–4CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

30. Greenwall, Harry J., When France Fell (London, 1958), pp. 61–2Google Scholar.

31. Maugham, W. Somerset, France at War (London, 1940), pp. 23–5Google Scholar.

32. Diamond, Fleeing Hitler, pp. 31–3, 38, 43–7, 54–5, 66–70, 74–7.

33. Ibid., p. 6.

34. Ibid., p. 2.

35. Freeman and Cooper, The Road to Bordeaux, p. 146; cf., for human-dog relations in another context and continent, Swart, Sandra and van Sittert, Lance, eds, Canis Africanis: A Dog History of Southern Africa (Leiden, 2008)Google Scholar.

36. Greenwall, When France Fell, p. 122.

37. Michael Morpurgo, ‘Horses are beautiful. But also stupid’, The Times (Saturday Review), 25th February 2012, p.15.

38. Carron, L., Fantassins sur l'Aisne. Mai-Juin 1940 (Grenoble and Paris, 1943), p. 15Google Scholar.

39. Ibid., p. 30.

40. Najafi and Kete, ‘Beastly Agendas’.

41. Morpurgo, ‘Horses are beautiful’.

42. Freeman and Cooper, Road to Bordeaux, pp. 145–6.

43. Diamond, Fleeing Hitler, p. 23.

44. Freeman and Cooper, Road to Bordeaux, pp. 83–4.

45. France: Service Historique de la Défense-Terre, Vincennes, Carton 32N14, Dr. 3 (5e DIM): Rapport du Commandant René Consigny sur les opérations de l'Etat-Major de la 5e DIM au cours de la campagne 1939–1940’ (Le Mans, 29th September 1945), p. 11.

46. Lecoq diary in Rémy (pseud. Gilbert Renault), Chronique d'une guerre perdue. III. Sedan (Paris, 1980), p. 113.

47. Folcher, Gustave, Marching to Captivity. The War Diaries of a French Peasant, 1939–45, eds Cazals, Rémy and Hill, Christopher (London and Washington, 1996), pp. 67, 73Google Scholar.

48. Hadley, Third Class to Dunkirk, pp. 54–5.

49. Ibid., pp. 76–7.

50. Tasse, Lieutenant-Colonel, La Randonnée du 9e Zouaves, 1939–1940 (Paris: Berger-Levrault, 1943), pp. 134–5Google Scholar.

51. Carron, Fantassins sur L'Aisne, p. 89.

52. Hadley, Third Class to Dunkirk, pp. 88–9.

53. Ibid., pp. 80–1.

54. Anon., The Diary of a Staff Officer (Air Intelligence Liaison Officer) at Advanced Headquarters North B.A.F.F. 1940 (London, 1941), p. 53.

55. Sadoul, Journal de guerre, p. 235.

56. Ibid., pp. 254–5.

57. Waterfield, G., What Happened to France (London, 1940), p. 76Google Scholar.

58. Freeman and Cooper, Road to Bordeaux, p. 164.

59. Sadoul, Journal de guerre, p. 254; Hadley, Third Class to Dunkirk, p. 55.

60. Log from 1940 of retreat through France – Part 1 by E. Dickens, Article ID: A3294768 available at http://www.bbc.co.uk/ww2peopleswar/stories/68/a3294768.shtml (accessed 19 Dec. 2007), p. 6 of transcript of a document donated to the Royal Air Force Museum, Hendon, London. Based until the start of war at RAF Newton, Nottinghamshire, 105 Squadron was operating two-man Fairey Battle light bombers in 1940; the Hurricanes belonged to 218 Squadron, co-located at Bethéniville.

61. Mousset, P., Quand le temps travaillait pour nous. Récit de guerre (Paris, 1941), pp. 56–9Google Scholar.

62. Felsenhardt, Robert, 1939–1940 avec le 18e Corps d'Armée (Paris, 1973), p. 84Google Scholar; the regiment belonged to General Marcel Aublet's 36th Infantry Division, part of IIIrd Army.

63. Balbaud, R., Cette drôle de guerre. Alsace-Lorraine—Belgique—Dunkerque (26 août 1939–1er juin 1940) (London, 1941), p. 30Google Scholar.

64. Hadley, Third Class to Dunkirk, p. 60.

65. Guerlain, R., Prisonnier de guerre. Derrière les fils barbelés, des armées se lèvent (London, 1944), pp.5–6Google Scholar; the defended villages, which the Wehrmacht did find uncompromisingly prickly, were nicknamed ‘Weygand hedgehogs’, after France's new supreme commander appointed on 20th May 1940, General Maxime Weygand.

66. Service Historique de la Défense-Terre: 34N118, Drs. 4–6 – Le Sergent Ritzmann de la C.A. 3 du 112e RIA au Lieutenant Andréis.

67. Balbaud, Cette drôle de guerre, pp. 50–1.

68. Jean Armandi, ‘Si la guerre est longue, je serai officer’, unpublished typescript memoir 1992, p.8; available at http://www.famille-roy.org/index.py?page=view&id=141 (accessed 8th June 2010).

69. Service Historique de la Défense-Terre, Carton 32N226 (VII Corps: 44e D.I. Etat-Major – 4e Bureau: no. 2302/4): Ordre générale d'opérations, no. 17 – 2e partie (valable à partir du 23 mai 1940, 21 heures), p. 2: ‘Viande fraiche’; ibid. (no. 2493/4): Ordre générale d'opérations, no. 20 (2e partie) - valable à partir du 29 Mai, 21 heures, p.1: ‘Ravitaillement en viande fraiche’; ibid. (4e Bureau no. 2686/4): Ordre générale d'opérations, no. 22 – 2e partie, 3 juin 1940 (valable à partir du 4 juin, 21 heures), p.2: ‘Ravitaillement en viande’.

70. Hadley, Third Class to Dunkirk, pp. 59–60.

71. Richardson, General Sir Charles, Flashback: A Soldier's Story (London, 1985), p. 66Google Scholar.

72. Field-Marshal the Viscount Montgomery, The Memoirs of Field-Marshal the Viscount Montgomery of Alamein, KG (London, 1958), p. 62Google Scholar; for regulation British Army provisioning arrangements, see Sheppard, Major E.W., Supply in War (London, 1938)Google Scholar.

73. Harman, Nicholas, Dunkirk: The Necessary Myth (London, 1980), pp. 85–6Google Scholar.

74. Richardson, A Soldier's Story, p. 68.

75. Freeman and Cooper, Road to Bordeaux, p. 125.

76. Guerlain, Prisonnier de guerre, p.11.

77. Thompson, F. M. L., ‘Horses in War’, Royal Historical Society Newsletter, new series, 3 (May 2009), 5–6, 5Google Scholar; also DiMarco, Louis A., War Horse: A History of the Military Horse and Rider (Yardley, PA, 2008)Google Scholar; Swart, Sandra and Bankoff, Greg, Breeds of Empire: The ‘Invention’ of the Horse in the Philippines and Southern Africa, 1500–1950 (Copenhagen, 2007)Google Scholar; Scott, Brough, Galloper Jack: The Remarkable Story of a Man who Rode a Real War Horse (London, 2012)Google Scholar.

78. DiNardo, Richard L., Mechanized Juggernaut or Military Anachronism? Horses and the German Army of World War II (New York, 1991)Google Scholar.

79. Dorondo, David R., Riders of the Apocalypse: German Cavalry and Modern Warfare, 1870–1945 (Annapolis, MD, 2012), pp. 124–32Google Scholar.

80. Ibid., pp. 133–7.

81. Antoine, André-Paul, ed., Mémorial de France. Faits d'Armes de la Campagne 1939–1940 (Paris, 1941), p. 51Google Scholar; later, the Germans expanded their cavalry to a corps that served on the Eastern Front. They also formed the 8th Waffen-SS Cavalry Division ‘Florian Geyer’, a formation stained by atrocities it committed in the USSR. (Dorondo, Riders of the Apocalypse, chapters 7–10).

82. Bailey, R., Love and War in the Pyrenees: A Story of Courage, Fear and Hope, 1939–1944 (London, 2009), p. 77Google Scholar.

83. See Badsey, Stephen, ‘The Boer War (1899–1902) and British Cavalry Doctrine – a re-evaluation’, The Journal of Military History, 71:1 (January 2006), 75–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Badsey, Stephen, Doctrine and Reform in the British Cavalry 1880–1918 (Farnham, 2008)Google Scholar; on French cavalry reconnaissance groups in 1940, http://grca.free.fr/historique_grdi/historique_grdi.htm (accessed 23 April 2012); on German cavalry, Dorondo, Riders of the Apocalypse, pp. 122–3.

84. Thompson, ‘Horses in War’, p. 5.

85. Roche, Daniel, ‘Equestrian Culture in France from the Sixteenth to the Nineteenth Century’, Past and Present, 199:1 (2008), 113–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar, explores the relationship between men and horses during a period when the animal became more than just a utilitarian object and developed into a powerful icon; also Roche, Daniel, ‘Les chevaux de la République: l'enquête de l'an III’, Revue d'histoire moderne et contemporaine, 55:4 (2008), 82–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar, for a time when horse-breeding became a vital concern in the Revolutionary wars; and Roche, Daniel, La culture equestre occidental, XVIe – XIXe siècles (Paris, vol. 1, 2008)Google Scholar.

86. McNeill, William H., ‘Conspicuous Proliferation’, New York Review of Books, 53:20 (21st December 2006)Google Scholar, reviewing Boot, Max, War Made New: Technology, Warfare and the Course of History, 1500 to Today (New York, 2006)Google Scholar; cf. van Creveld, Martin, Supplying War: Logistics from Wallenstein to Patton (Cambridge, 1977)Google Scholar.

87. Kenyon, David, Horsemen in No Man's Land: British Cavalry and Trench Warfare 1914–1918 (Barnsley, 2011)Google Scholar; Butler, Simon, The War Horses: The Tragic Fate of a Million Horses Sacrificed in the First World War (Wellington, Somerset, 2011)Google Scholar.

88. See, sous-secrétaire d'Etat de la Guerre (Artillerie) à M. le général commandant-en-chef (Etat-Major 1er Bureau), 31st January 1916, in Les Armées Françaises dans la Grande Guerre (Paris: Service Historique de l'Armée, 1931), 3, annexes 4, no. 3334; and Direction des Services Automobiles, ‘Note a l'Etat-Major général (3e Bureau) au sujet des moyens de transport par automobiles dont dispose actuellement la direction de l'arrière, en dehors des dotations des armées, 17th January 1916, in ibid., no. 3309.

89. Thompson, ‘Horses in War’, p. 5; also DiNardo, Richard L. and Bay, Austin, ‘Horse-Drawn Transport in the German Army’, Journal of Contemporary History, 23:1 (January 1988), 129–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

90. Dorondo, Riders of the Apocalypse, p. 123.

91. These formations and the seven motorised divisions were, across the mobilised French armies as a whole, the ones with the highest proportions of regular career officers (as distinct from reservists), volunteer professional soldiers, fully-trained conscripts, and modern weapons.

92. Service Historique de la Défense-Terre: 32N77 (13e Division d'Infanterie): Carnet de Mobilisation – Tableaux d'encadrement en officiers supérieurs des corps de la 13e D.I.

93. F. W. Cook, Our Battery, 1914–1919 (privately published – author's collection); also Scott, Warrior.

94. Folcher, Marching to Captivity, p. 24.

95. Tasse, Avec le 9e Zouaves, p. 37.

96. Roger Mauret, ‘Heiltz-le-Maurupt: période 1939–1940’, at http://www.heiltz-le-maurupt.fr/his_1939_40.asp (accessed 9th September 2010).

97. Service Historique de la Défense-Terre: 30N52, Dr. 1 – 8e C.A. Etat-Major 3e Bureau. Journal de marche du 1 septembre 1939 au 30 juin 1940.

98. Balbaud, Cette drôle de guerre, p. 30.

99. Ibid., pp. 53–4.

100. Simond, Gérard, Décrochages. Sedan 10 mai – St. Valéry-en-Caux 12 juin 1940 (Annecy, 1975), pp. 79–80Google Scholar.

101. Morpurgo, ‘Horses are beautiful’, p. 15.

102. Service Historique de la Défense-Terre: 34N527 (29e DI), 34e GRDI, Journal de Marche, p. 22 (6th June 1940).

103. Service Historique de la Défense-Terre: 32N77 (13e DI), Dr.3: Les operations de la 13e Division d'Infanterie, p. 5.

104. Service Historique de la Défense-Terre: 32N182, General Paul Gérodias, ‘Souvenirs de Guerre, 1939–40’, p. 30.

105. Service Historique de la Défense-Terre: 32N37, Dr.10 (8e Division d'Infanterie – Artillerie Divisionnaire) – ‘Annexe au Journal de marche de l'A.D./8. Considérations relatives a l'Artillerie pendant les journées des 7, 8 et 9 juin 1940’.

106. Morpurgo, ‘Horses are beautiful’, p. 15.

107. ‘One Hundred Thirteen Days of War and Captivity. Diary of Commandant Jean-Antoine Mouzel. June 13 through October 3, 1940’ (transl. by Dr. Ruth J. Strubel), p. 14, author's collection, with thanks to J. Kim Munholland, Professor Emeritus of Modern European History, University of Minnesota - Twin Cities for enabling me to see this document.

108. See Alexander, Martin S., ‘After Dunkirk: The French Army's Performance against “Case Red”, 25 May to 25 June 1940’, War in History, 14:2 (April 2007), pp. 219–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

109. Vinen, Richard, The Unfree French: Life under the Occupation (London, 2006), p.31Google Scholar.

110. Freeman and Cooper, Road to Bordeaux, p. 146

111. Melville, Elinor G. K., A Plague of Sheep: Environmental Consequences of the Conquest of Mexico (Cambridge, 1997)Google Scholar; Taylor, Lynne, ‘The Black Market in Occupied Northern France, 1940–44’, Contemporary European History, 6:2 (July 1997), 153–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Schwartz, Paula, ‘The Politics of Food and Gender in Occupied Paris’, Modern and Contemporary France, 7:1 (February 1999), 35–45Google Scholar; Mouré, Kenneth and Schwartz, Paula, ‘“On vit mal”: Food Shortages and Popular Culture in Occupied France, 1940–44’, Food, Culture and Society, 10:2 (Summer 2007), 262–95Google Scholar.