Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-2lccl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T18:56:45.630Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Self-Evident Truth and the Declaration of Independence

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 August 2009

Extract

One of the most difficult features of the Declaration of Independence is the assertion within it that “we hold these truths to be self-evident.…” Careful examination of the text of the Declaration reveals, however, that the truths are not in fact said to be “self-evident” but are rather, as a matter of healthy political practice, to be treated as if self-evident. Appreciating the status of the so-called self-evident truths above all brings into focus the problem of politics as civic education in this regime, especially as seen by Jefferson. It also helps focus attention on the structure of the Declaration and clarifies some recent scholarly disputes over the meaning and sources of the Declaration.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © University of Notre Dame 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Notes

1 Commager, Henry Steele, Jefferson, Nationalism and the Enlightenment (New York: G. Braziller, 1975), p. xi.Google Scholar

2 Commager, , Jefferson, p. 82.Google Scholar

3 Levinson, Sanford, “Self-Evident Truths in the Declaration of Independence”, Texas Law Review 57 (1979): 856.Google Scholar

4 Brann, Eva, “Concerning the Declaration of Independence,” The College (of St. John's College) 28 (1973): 13.Google Scholar

5 Levinson, , “Self-Evident Truths,” p. 858.Google Scholar

6 Howell, Wilbur Samuel, “The Declaration of Independence and Eighteenth Century Logic,” in A Casebook on the Declaration of Independence, ed. Ginsberg, Robert (New York: Crowell Co., 1966), pp. 198–99Google Scholar. White, Morton, The Philosophy of the American Revolution (New York: Oxford University Press, 1978), pp. 1114.Google Scholar

7 E.g., Boorstin, Daniel, The Genius of American Politics (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1953), pp. 8084.Google Scholar

8 White, , Philosophy of American Revolution, pp. 10, 14 Google Scholar. But cf. Commager, , Jefferson, p. 80.Google Scholar

9 Locke, John, Two Treatises on Government 2.1.Google Scholar

10 Thomas Jefferson to Weightman, Roger, 24 06 1826 Google Scholar in Koch, Adrienne and Peden, William, ed., The Life and Selected Writings of Thomas Jefferson (New York: Modern Library, 1944), pp. 729–30.Google Scholar

11 Howell, , “The Declaration,” pp. 205206 Google Scholar, cf. Locke, John, Essay Concerning Human Understanding 4. 7., 17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

12 Locke, , Essay 4. 7. 11.Google Scholar

13 Koch, Adrienne, Power, Morals, and the Founding Fathers (Ithaca, NY: Great Seal Books, 1961), p. 26.Google Scholar

14 Ginsberg, Robert, “The Declaration as Rhetoric,”Google Scholar in Ginsberg, , Casebook, p. 227.Google Scholar

15 Jefferson, to Carr, Peter, 10 08 1787 Google Scholar in Koch, and Peden, , Life and Writings, 430.Google Scholar

16 Cf. White, , Philosophy of American Revolution, pp. 996.Google Scholar

17 Cf. Berns, Walter, “Religion and the Founding Principle,”Google Scholar in Horwitz, Robert, The Moral Foundations of the American Republic (Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia, 1986), pp. 204229.Google Scholar

18 Cf. Jaffa, Harry V., How to Think About the American Revolution (Durham, N. Carolina: Carolina Academic Press, 1978), pp. 37, 109–10.Google Scholar

19 Locke, , Two Treatises II, 54.Google Scholar

20 Locke, , Two Treatises II, 95 Google Scholar; cf. II, 6, 7.

21 Locke, , Two Treatises II, 95.Google Scholar

22 Diamond, Martin, “The Revolution of Sober Expectations,” in The American Revolution: Three Views (New York: American Brands, 1975), 64 Google Scholar. Cf. Jaffa, , How to Think, 105.Google Scholar

23 E.g., Dunn, John, “The Politics of Locke in England and America,” in Volton, John, ed., John Locke: Problems and Perspectives (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1969)Google Scholar; Wills, , Inventing America.Google Scholar

24 White, , Philosophy of American Revolution, 65.Google Scholar

25 Ibid. 48, 97; cf. 77, 94.

26 Ibid. 23–53.

27 Locke, , Essays on the Law of Nature, ed. Van Leyden, (Oxford, 1954), 113–15; 133–35.Google Scholar

28 Locke, , Essays on the Law of Nature, 149.Google Scholar

29 White, , Philosophy of American Revolution, 158.Google Scholar

30 Locke, , Two Treatises II, 4 Google Scholar Cf. White, , Philosophy of American Revolution, 65ff.Google Scholar; Jaffa, , How to Think, 40, 109–10.Google Scholar

31 White, , Philosophy of American Revolution, 65.Google Scholar

32 Locke, , Essay 2. 4. 7. 2.Google Scholar

33 Locke, , Essay 4. 10 Google Scholar. Cf. Zuckert, Michael, “An Introduction to Locke's First Treatise,” Interpretation (1979): 70 Google Scholar; Bluhm, William T. et al. , “Locke's Idea of God,” Journal of Politics, 1980, 414–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

34 Cf. Locke, , Essay 4. 7., 1216.Google Scholar

35 White, , Philosophy of American Revolution, 178 Google Scholar, citing Locke, , Essay 1., 3., 4.Google Scholar

36 White, , Philosophy of American Revolution, 14, 164ff.Google Scholar

37 Ibid., 161.

38 Ibid., 77.

39 Ibid., 161.

40 Ibid., 77.

41 Jefferson, to Madison, , 08 30, 1823 Google Scholar, in Ginsberg, , A Casebook, 3031.Google Scholar

42 Wills, , Inventing America, 182.Google Scholar

43 Ibid., 182, 190.

44 Ibid., 191.

45 Ibid., 238. One should note that no matter what Wills asserts, the “self-evident truths” phrase is not “Reid's own”—it was common currency in the pre-Scottish philosophic tradition, prominent in Locke and, for that matter, in scholasticism. Nor were the “truths” themselves the particular property of Hutcheson or Hume!

46 Reid, Thomas, Essays in the Intellectual Powers of Man, 1785, in Words , ed. Hamilton, (Edinburgh, 1863).Google Scholar

47 Wills, , Inventing America 181 Google Scholar; Reid, , Essays, “Essay VII,” chap. 2, pp. 479–80.Google Scholar