Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-dwq4g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-29T16:30:46.397Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Conversion to the Balance of Power

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 August 2009

Extract

Political thought in the United States certainly bears out the truth of the observation that infancy impressions are the determining factor of a nation's as well as of an individual's outlook. Americans had to wrest their independence from an imperialistic British government headed by a king. This became the source of three indelible notions: first, crowns are all suspect; secondly, imperialism is something specifically British; thirdly, since British foreign policy has been imperialistic, its methods stand condemned, and one of them is known as the balance-of-power. Conclusion: away with that balance!

So it happened that the second half of the twentieth century had to dawn before American statesmen and generals realized and proclaimed the necessity of the balance-of-power and before the American public was ready to be told so. On May 29, 1951, there occurred a significant exchange in the Senate inquiry on the MacArthur ouster.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © University of Notre Dame 1952

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 The Correspondence of Prince Talleyrand and King Louis XVIII During the Congress of Vienna (New York, 1881), pages xv and xvi.Google Scholar

2 (New York, 1942), page 222.

3 (Chicago, 1951), pages 84 and 85.