Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-5g6vh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T05:14:03.640Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Regenerating narrative: the gospels as fiction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 October 2008

T. R. Wright
Affiliation:
The University, Newcastle Upon Tyne

Extract

To read the gospels as fiction, as Frank Kermode does in The Genesis of Secrecy, the Charles Eliot Norton lectures delivered at Harvard in 1977–8, does not require the abandonment of all concern for ‘history’ or for ‘truth’, two other fictions which are essential for faith. Nor, In Defence of the Imagination, the title Dame Helen Gardner gave to her Charles Eliot Norton lectures of 1979–80, need apologists for Christianity commit themselves to a wholesale rejection of literary critical methods such as structuralism, as she suggests. There is a middle ground which can accept many of the methods of structuralism and even of post-structuralism without sharing the anti-theological assumptions of some of their practitioners. Structuralist analysis aims for objectivity, a scientific description of the processes at work in the production of meaning, a systematic articulation of the ‘grammar’ of narrative. It is therefore neither for nor against Christianity. Kermode's book, I argue, helps to show how the gospels function as narrative, revealing their capacity to ‘redescribe life’. In recognising their fictive nature, however, we need not consign ourselves with him to ‘endless disappointment’. For the gospels have aregenerating power which can transform our lives.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Auerbach, Eric (1946). Mimesis: The Representation of Reality in Western Literature, New York.Google Scholar
Barthes, Roland (1977). Image – Music – Text, essays selected and translated by Heath, Stephen, London.Google Scholar
Culler, Jonathan (1983). On Deconstruction, London.Google Scholar
Farrer, Austin (1948). The Glass of Vision, Glasgow.Google Scholar
Farrer, Austin (1951). A Study in St. Mark, London.Google Scholar
Farrer, Austin (1953). St. Matthew and St. Mark, London.Google Scholar
Farrer, Austin (1976). Interpretation and Belief, edited by Conti, Charles, London.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel (1977). ‘Nietzsche, Genealogy, History’. In Language, Counter-Memory, Practice, edited and translated by Bouchard, Donald F. and Simon, Sherry, Ithaca.Google Scholar
Gardner, Helen (1959). The Business of Criticism, London.Google Scholar
Gardner, Helen (1982). In Defence of the Imagination, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
Hawkes, Terence (1977). Structuralism and Semiotics, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kermode, Frank (1967). The Sense of an Ending, London.Google Scholar
Kermode, Frank (1979). The Genesis of Secrecy, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
Kermode, Frank (1982). ‘On Being an Enemy of Humanity’, Raritan 87102.Google Scholar
Jasper, David (1982). ‘On Reading the Scriptures as Literature’, History of European Ideas III, 311–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manzoni, Alessandro (1923). ‘Del Romanzo Storico’, Tutte le Opere di Manzoni, edited by Florence, G. Lesca, pp. 835–72.Google Scholar
Medcalf, Stephen (1981). ‘The Coincidence of Myth and Fact’, Ways of Reading the Bible, edited by Brighton, Michael Wadsworth, pp. 5578.Google Scholar
Nineham, Dennis, ed. (1963). The Gospel of St. Mark, Harmondsworth.Google Scholar
Norris, Christopher (1982). Deconstruction: Theory and Practice, London.Google Scholar