^{page 203 note 1} A usage initiated in and, M. L.Prior, A. N., ‘Erotetic Logic’, The Philosophical Review, LXIV (1955), 43–59.Google Scholar

^{page 203 note 2} Principles of Reasoning (New York: Dover, 1967), p. 33.Google Scholar

^{page 204 note 1} De Interpretatione 20 b 22Google Scholar; Topica 160a 34.Google Scholar

^{page 204 note 2} For further elaboration of these terms, see Strawson, P. F., Introduction to Logical Theory, pp. 18Google Scholar, 30 n, 175–9, 186–7, 213–17; and Leonard, H. S., Principles, pp. 34–6.Google Scholar

^{page 204 note 3} Principles, pp. 36–7.Google Scholar

^{page 205 note 1} Aristotle, , Prior Analytics 24a 16, trans. Cooke, H. P. and Tredennick, H. in Aristotle, 26 vols. (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1967), 1, 199.Google Scholar

^{page 205 note 2} Trans. Tredennick, H. and Forster, E. S. in Aristotle, Posterior Analytics/Topica (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1966), pp. 709–11.Google Scholar

^{page 206 note 1} In Topica Ciceronis, lib. 1; Patrologia Latina 64, 1048DGoogle Scholar, quoted in Chenu, M.-D., Toward Understanding Saint Thomas, trans. Landry, A.-M. and Hughes, D. (Chicago: Henry Regnery, 1964), p. 94.Google Scholar

^{page 207 note 1} ‘Where Does the World Come From?’ in Without Answers (New York: Schocken, 1969), pp. 115–19.Google Scholar

^{page 207 note 2} As in Belnap, Nuel D. Jr, ‘Questions and Presuppositions’, in The Logical Way of Doing Things, ed. Lambert, Karel (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1969), p. 35.Google Scholar

^{page 207 note 3} On Certainty, ed. Anscombe, G. E. M. and Wright, G. E., trans, Anscombe, G. E. M. and Paul, Denis (New York: J. & J. Harper Editions, 1969), pp. 2–27.Google Scholar

^{page 209 note 1} Harrah, David, ‘A System for Erotetic Sentences’, in The Logical Enterprise, ed. Anderson, , Marcus, , and Martin, (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1975), pp. 235–45.Google Scholar

^{page 210 note 1} ‘Questions and Presuppositions’, p. 23.Google Scholar

^{page 210 note 2} Harrah, David, ‘Erotetic Logistics’, in The Logical Way of Doing Things, ed. Lambert, pp. 3–21.Google Scholar

^{page 210 note 3} See especially ‘Questions and Presuppositions’, pp. 34–7.

^{page 211 note 1} Philosophical Investigations, 1, 58.Google Scholar

^{page 213 note 1} ‘Erotetic Logic’, pp. 51–5.Google Scholar

^{page 213 note 2} ‘A System for Erotetic Sentences’, pp. 237–9.Google Scholar

^{page 213 note 3} Trans. McGill, Arthur C., in The Many-Faced Argument, ed. Hick, John and McGill, Arthur C., p. 4.Google Scholar

^{page 214 note 1} See, for instance, The Divine Names of Pseudo-Dionysius, inDionysius the Areopagite, trans. Rolt, C. E. (London: SPCK, 1940), pp. 50–190.Google Scholar

^{page 214 note 2} Reasons and Faiths (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1958), pp. 20–53.Google Scholar

^{page 215 note 1} Monologion, in Saint Anselm: Basic Writings, trans. Deane, S. N., 2nd edn (La Salle, Illinois: Open Court, 1962), pp. 37–40Google Scholar; Proslogion, preface, in Ibid. pp. 1–3.

^{page 215 note 2} Summa Theologiae, 1a 2, 3Google Scholar; Summa Contra Gentiles, 1, 13.Google Scholar

^{page 215 note 3} Thus Bernard Lonergan: ‘…I should say that normally religious conversion precedes the effort to work out rigorous proofs for the existence of God. But I do not think it impossible that such proofs might be a factor facilitating religious conversion so that, by way of exception, certain knowledge of God's existence should precede the acceptance of God's gift of his love.’ Method in Theology (New York: Herder and Herder, 1972), p. 339.Google Scholar