Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-8bljj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-23T09:17:09.104Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

God knows: acquaintance and the nature of divine knowledge

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 September 2017

TRAVIS M. DICKINSON
TRAVIS M. DICKINSON*
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy, Southwestern Baptist Theological Seminary, 2001 W. Seminary Dr., Fort Worth, Texas, 76115, USA
*
e-mail: tdickinson@swbts.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Theists typically believe that God knows all truths. However, accounts of divine omniscience almost always focus on the scope of God's knowledge or perhaps on whether certain kinds of facts are there to be known by God, such as counterfactuals of creaturely freedom or future contingent facts. Very rarely do these accounts include for analysis the nature of God's knowledge. In this article, I develop an acquaintance theory of God's knowledge where acquaintance with an epistemic relation that guarantees that the truth of God's beliefs is necessary for knowledge. I argue that this view achieves an ideal way of knowing, worthy of the divine being.

Type
Original Article
Information
Religious Studies , Volume 55 , Issue 1 , March 2019 , pp. 1 - 16
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alston, William (1986) ‘Does God have beliefs?’, Religious Studies, 22, 287–306.Google Scholar
Alston, William (1989) Divine Nature and Human Language: Essays in Philosophical Theology (Ithaca NY: Cornell University Press).Google Scholar
Arnold, Alexander (2015) ‘Knowledge first and Ockhamism’, in Kvanvig, Jonathan (ed.) Oxford Studies in Philosophy of Religion, VI (New York: Oxford University Press), 1–20.Google Scholar
BonJour, Lawrence (2004) ‘In search of direct realism’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 69, 349–367.Google Scholar
Craig, William (1988) The Problem of Divine Foreknowledge and Future Contingents from Aristotle to Suarez (Leiden: E. J. Brill).Google Scholar
Craig, William (1999) The Only Wise God: The Compatibility of Divine Foreknowledge and Human Freedom, (Eugene OR: Wipf & Stock Publishers).Google Scholar
Fumerton, Richard (1995) Metaepistemology and Skepticism (Lanham MD: Rowman & Littlefield).Google Scholar
Fumerton, Richard (2002) Realism and the Correspondence Theory of Truth (Lanham MD: Rowman & Littlefield).Google Scholar
Ganssle, Gregory (2001) ‘Direct awareness and God's experience of a temporal now’, in Ganssle, Gregory & Woodruff, David (eds) God and Time: Essays on Divine Nature (New York: Oxford University Press), 165–181.Google Scholar
Gettier, Edmund (1963) ‘Is justified true belief knowledge?’, Analysis, 23, 121–123.Google Scholar
Hasan, Ali & Fumerton, Richard (2014) ‘Knowledge by acquaintance vs. description’, in Zalta, Edward N. (ed.) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, <http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2014/entries/knowledge-acquaindescrip/>..>Google Scholar
Hasker, William (1988) ‘Yes, God Has Beliefs!’, Religious Studies, 24, 385–394.Google Scholar
Hasker, William (1989) God, Time, and Knowledge (Ithaca NY: Cornell University Press).Google Scholar
Hasker, William (2004) Providence, Evil and the Openness of God (New York: Routledge).Google Scholar
Jackson, Frank (1977) Perception: A Representative Theory (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Mavrodes, George (1988) ‘How does God know the things that he knows?’, in Morris, Thomas (ed.) Divine and Human Action: Essays in the Metaphysics of Theism (Ithaca: Cornell University Press), 345–361.Google Scholar
Moser, Paul (1985) Empirical justification (Dordrecht: Reidel).Google Scholar
Pike, Nelson (1965) ‘Divine omniscience and voluntary action’, The Philosophical Review, 74, 27–46.Google Scholar
Pike, Nelson (1970) God and Timelessness (London: Routledge).Google Scholar
Pinnock, Clark (1994) The Openness of God (Downers Grove IL: InterVarsity Press).Google Scholar
Plantinga, Alvin (1993) ‘Divine knowledge’, in Evans, C. Stephen & Westphal, Merold (eds) Christian Perspectives on Religious Perspectives (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans), 40–66.Google Scholar
Price, H. H. (1934) ‘Some considerations about belief’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 35, 229.Google Scholar
Russell, Bertrand (1911) ‘Knowledge by acquaintance and knowledge by description’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 11, 108–128.Google Scholar
Russell, Bertrand (1959) The Problems of Philosophy (New York: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Sellars, Wilfrid (1963) Science, Perception and Reality (Atascadero CA: Ridgeview Publishing Company).Google Scholar
Sosa, Ernest & Bonjour, Lawrence (2003) Epistemic Justification: Internalism vs. Externalism, Foundations vs. Virtues (Malden MA: Blackwell).Google Scholar
Stump, Eleonore (2003) Aquinas (New York: Routledge).Google Scholar
Swinburne, Richard (1993) Coherence of Theism (Oxford: Clarendon Press).Google Scholar
Wainwright, W. (2010) ‘Omnipotence, omniscience, and omnipresence’, in Taliaferro, Charles & Meister, Chad (eds) The Cambridge Companion to Philosophical Theology (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 46–65.Google Scholar
Wierenga, Edward (1989) The Nature of God (Ithaca NY: Cornell University Press).Google Scholar
Wierenga, Edward (2001) ‘Timelessness out of mind: on the alleged incoherence of divine timelessness’, in Ganssle, Gregory & Woodruff, David (eds) God and Time (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 153–164.Google Scholar
Wierenga, Edward (2009) ‘Omniscience’, in Flint, Thomas & Rea, Michael (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Philosophical Theology (New York: Oxford University Press), 129–144.Google Scholar
Williamson, Timothy (2000) Knowledge and its Limits (New York: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Zagzebski, Linda (2007) ‘Omniscience’, in Meister, Chad & Copan, Paul (eds) The Routledge Companion to Philosophy of Religion (New York: Routledge), 261–269.Google Scholar
Zagzebski, Linda (2008) ‘The inescapability of Gettier problems’, in Sosa, Earnest, Kim, Jaegwon, Fantl, Jeremy, & McGrath, Matthew (eds) Epistemology: An Anthology (New York: Blackwell), 207–212.Google Scholar