Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-m9pkr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-10T05:27:01.462Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Comments on Professor Løgstrup's paper

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 October 2008

Paul Helm
Paul Helm
Affiliation:
Senior Lecturer in Philosophy, University of Liverpool
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

I find myself in serious difficulties over Professor Løgstrup's paper. There are many points on which I am far from confident that I have understood him, and on the points where I am confident I have understood him that confidence may well prove to be misplaced. What I shall try to do in these comments is to provide in my own words an account of what I think is the argument of Professor Løgstrup's paper; then I shall try to say why I think that that argument is unconvincing. Finally I shall try to say something about the kind of programme that Professor Løgstrup sets himself, and the sort of programme that is in my view incumbent on a Christian philosopher of religion.

Type
Articles
Information
Religious Studies , Volume 15 , Issue 2 , June 1979 , pp. 239 - 245
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1979

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 240 note 1 Mysticism and Logic, p. 41.

page 241 note 1 Descartes, R., Philosophical Works, trans. Haldane and Ross, I, 168.Google Scholar