Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-pfhbr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-10T16:28:16.477Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Another look at Hume's treatment of the argument from design in the Natural History of Religion

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 July 2016

EMILY KELAHAN
EMILY KELAHAN*
Affiliation:
Philosophy Department, Illinois Wesleyan University, P. O. Box 2900, Bloomington, IL 61702, USA
*
e-mail: ekelahan@iwu.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article argues that Hume's seemingly peculiar treatment of the argument from design in his Natural History of Religion is not indicative of a radical, or even modest, shift in his overall epistemic evaluation of it. His focus is on the argument's impact on the psychology of religious believers, and not its rational acceptability. Hume never strays far from his stated intention for the work, to engage in a socio-psychological analysis of the nature of religious belief, including a thorough assessment of the role of the argument from design. Hume concludes that the argument is inconsequential to religious belief formation.

Type
Articles
Information
Religious Studies , Volume 52 , Issue 4 , December 2016 , pp. 461 - 474
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Falkenstein, Lorne (2003) ‘Hume's project in “The Natural History of Religion”’, Religious Studies, 39, 1–21.Google Scholar
Garrett, Don (2012) ‘What's true about Hume's “true religion”?’, The Journal of Scottish Philosophy, 10, 199–220.Google Scholar
Hume, David (2007a) Dialogues concerning Natural Religion, Coleman, Dorothy (ed.) (Cambridge: Cambridge).Google Scholar
Hume, David (2007b) A Treatise of Human Nature, Norton, D. F. and Norton, M. (eds) (Oxford: Clarendon).Google Scholar
Hume, David (2008) A Dissertation on the Passions and the Natural History of Religion, Beauchamp, Tom L. (ed.) (Oxford: Clarendon).Google Scholar
Kail, P. J. E. (2007) ‘Understanding Hume's Natural History of Religion ’, The Philosophical Quarterly, 57, 190–211.Google Scholar
Malherbe, Michel (1995) ‘Hume's Natural History of Religion ’, Hume Studies, 21, 255–274.Google Scholar
Marušić, Jennifer Smalligan (2012) ‘Refuting the whole system? Hume's attack on popular religion in The Natural History of Religion ’, The Philosophical Quarterly, 62, 716–736.Google Scholar
Webb, Mark (1991) ‘The argument of the Natural History ’, Hume Studies, 17, 141–160.Google Scholar