Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-8zxtt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-10T12:31:04.700Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Gale–Pruss cosmological argument: Tractarian and advaita Hindu objections

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 July 2016

RICHARD McDONOUGH
RICHARD McDONOUGH*
Affiliation:
Arium Academy, Arts and Social Sciences, 51 Cuppage Road, #06-23, Republic of Singapore229469
*
e-mail: rmm249@cornell.edu, wittgensteins_poker2007@yahoo.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The article criticizes Gale and Pruss's new cosmological argument (hereafter GP) which purports to prove that the world is created/designed by a powerful intelligent necessarily existing supernatural being (not the full-fledged God of theism). First, the article employs a ‘necessitist’ counterexample to GP's modal premise, S5. Second, it is argued that GP presupposes a restricted range of possible accounts of the generation of the universe. Third, it is argued that GP's argument that the creator is a necessary being is flawed. Fourth, it is argued that GP's argument against Quinn's objection, modelled on the advaita Hindu view of creation by an impersonal being, also fails.

Type
Articles
Information
Religious Studies , Volume 52 , Issue 4 , December 2016 , pp. 513 - 523
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bishop, Robert (2008) ‘Chaos’, Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, <http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/chaos/>.Google Scholar
Deutsch, Eliot (1973) Advaita Vedānta: A Philosophical Reconstruction (Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press).Google Scholar
Dummett, Michael (2000) Elements of Intuitionism (Oxford: Clarendon Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flood, Gavin (1996) An Introduction to Hinduism (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Gale, Richard (1986) ‘ A priori arguments from God's abstractness’, Noûs, 20, 531–543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gale, Richard (1999) ‘A new argument for the existence of God: one that works, well sort of’, in Bruntrup, G. & Tacelli, R. K. (eds) The Rationality of Theism: Essays in the Philosophy of Religion (Dordrecht: Kluwer), 85–103.Google Scholar
Gale, Richard & Pruss, Alexander (1999) ‘A new cosmological argument’, Religious Studies, 35, 461–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodwin, Brian (1994) How the Leopard Changed its Spots (Princeton: Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
Hume, David (1998) Dialogues on Natural Religion, Popkin, Richard (ed.) (Indianapolis: Hackett).Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (1996) Critique of Pure Reason, Pluher, Werner (tr.) (Indianapolis: Hackett).Google Scholar
Pruss, Alexander (2010) ‘The ontological argument and the motivational centre of our lives’, Religious Studies, 46, 233–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russell, Bertrand (1967) A Critical Exposition of the Philosophy of Leibniz (London: George Allen and Unwin).Google Scholar
Russell, Paul (2013) ‘Hume on Religion’, Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, <http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/hume-religion/#ArgDes>.Google Scholar
Taimni, I. K. (1974) Man, God and the Universe (Madras: Quest Books).Google Scholar
Uzquiano, Gabriel (2014) ‘Quantifiers and Quantification’, Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, <http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/quantification/>.Google Scholar
von Wright, G. H. (2008) Explanation and Understanding (London: Routledge).Google Scholar
West, M. L. (1983) The Orphic Poems (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Whitehead, A. N. (1968) Modes of Thought (New York: Free Press).Google Scholar
Williamson, Timothy (2008) Modal Logic as Metaphysics (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig (1961) Tractatus-Logico-Philosophicus, Pears, David (tr.) (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul).Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig (1966) Notebooks, 1914–16, Anscombe, G. E. M. (tr.) (New York & Evanston: Harper & Row).Google Scholar