Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-wq484 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T14:44:59.849Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Wage Formation in a Two-Sector Open Economy with Two Strong Unions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 August 2016

Oddbjørn Raaum*
Affiliation:
Department of Economics, University of Oslo
Get access

Extract

1. INTRODUCTION

Observing wage formation, at least in Norway during recent years, you cannot miss the unions increased emphasis on relative wages in the wage negotiations. This focus might be motivated by tactical reasons. Relatively decreasing wages is often a good argument, at least as far as support from the public opinion is concerned. On the other hand, people’s appreciation of their situation (here wages) does often depends on the situation of “groups with which we naturally compare ourselves”.

The economics of trade unions is a rapidly expanding area. Oswald (1985) and Pencavel (1985) have given surveys of the last years’ literature. So far, little attention has been paid to the existence of different sectors and trade unions in the economy. A multisectoral framework may imply interdependence between the wage claims of the different unions. When the unions care about relative wages, there will be implications for the wage formation process. In an economy with more than one union there might exist links between wage claims of different trade unions. There are roughly three main ways in which the interdependence takes place. First, the wage claims of one union may affect the demand for workers who are members of the other unions.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Université catholique de Louvain, Institut de recherches économiques et sociales 1986 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

I wish to thank Tor Hersoug and Michael Hoel for helpful discussion and comments.

References

LITERATURE

Aukrust, O. (1978), Inflation in the Open Economy. A Norwegian Model, Artikler nr. 96, Central Bureau of Statistics, Oslo 1978.Google Scholar
Binmore, A., Rubinstein, A. and Wolinsky, A. (1985), The Nash Bargaining Solution in Economic Modelling, ICERD Discussion paper 85/112, London School of Economics.Google Scholar
Calmfors, L. (1982), Employment Policies, Wage Formation and Trade Union Behaviour in a Small Open Economy, Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 2.Google Scholar
Gylfason, T. and Lindbeck, A. (1984a), Union Rivalry and Wages. An Oligoplistic Approach, Economica, Vol. 51, No 202.Google Scholar
Gylfason, T. and Lindbeck, A. (1984b), Competing Wage Claims, Cost Inflation and Capacity Utilization, European Economic Review 24, 121.Google Scholar
Hersoug, T. (1983), Union Wage Responses to Tax Changes, Oxford Economic Papers, Vol. 36, 3751.Google Scholar
Hersoug, T. (1985), Workers Versus Government? Who Adjusts to Whom?, Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 87 (2), 270291.Google Scholar
Johansen, L., (1977), Lectures on Macroeconomic Planning, Part 1 General Aspects, North Holland.Google Scholar
Johansen, L. (1982), On the Status of the Nash Type of an Non-Cooperative Equilibrium in Economic Theory, Scandinavian Journal of Economics.Google Scholar
Hoel, M. (1981), The Domestic Demand Compensated Effects of Changes in the Exchange Rate, Foreign Prices, Tariffs and Foreign Demand, Scandinavian Journal of Economics, pp. 508521.Google Scholar
Oswald, A. (1985), The Economic Theory of Trade Unions: An Introductory Survey, Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 87 (2), 160193.Google Scholar
Oswald, A. (1979), Wage Determination in an Economy with many Trade Unions, Oxford Economic Papers, No 3, Vol. 31.Google Scholar
Pemberton, J. (1984), Wage Bargaining and the Microeconomic Theory of the Trade Union, Mimeo, Reading University.Google Scholar
Pencavel, J. (1985), Wages and Employment under Trade Unionism; Microeconomic Models and Macroeconomic Applications, Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 2, 197225.Google Scholar