Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (2017) GBD Compare | Viz Hub. Graphic Risks by cause: Global, Category behavioral risks, Level two, Deaths and DALYs, Both sexes, All ages, 2017. https://vizhub.healthdata.org/gbd-compare/ (accessed September 2018).
Peñalvo, JL, Cudhea, F, Micha, R et al. (2017) The potential impact of food taxes and subsidies on cardiovascular disease and diabetes burden and disparities in the United States. BMC Med 15, 208.
Louzada, MLC, Ricardo, CZ, Steele, EM et al. (2017) The share of ultra-processed foods determines the overall nutritional quality of diets in Brazil. Public Health Nutr 21, Suppl. 1, 94–102.
Monteiro, CA, Moubarac, JC, Cannon, G et al. (2013) Ultra-processed products are becoming dominant in the global food system. Obes Rev 14, Suppl. 2, 21–28.
Popkin, BM & Reardon, T (2018) Obesity and the food system transformation in Latin America. Obes Rev 19, 1028–1064.
Martins, APB, Levy, RB, Claro, RM et al. (2013) Participação crescente de produtos ultraprocessados na dieta brasileira (1987–2009). Rev Saude Publica 47, Suppl. 4, 656–665.
Morris, MA, Hulme, C, Clarke, GP et al. (2014) What is the cost of a healthy diet? Using diet data from the UK Women’s Cohort Study. J Epidemiol Community Health 68, 1043–1049.
Drewnowski, A (2010) The cost of US foods as related to their nutritive value. Am J Clin Nutr 92, 1181–1188.
Claro, RM, Maia, EG, Costa, BVL et al. (2016) Preço dos alimentos no Brasil: prefira preparações culinárias a alimentos ultraprocessados. Cad Saude Publica 32, Suppl. 8, e00104715.
Yuba, TY, Sarti, FM, Campino, ACC et al. (2013) Evolução dos preços relativos de grupos alimentares entre 1939 e 2010, em São Paulo, SP. Rev Saude Publica 47, Suppl. 3, 549–559.
Jones, NRV, Conklin, AI, Suhrcke, M et al. (2014) The growing price gap between more and less healthy foods: analysis of a novel longitudinal UK dataset. PLoS One 9, Suppl. 10, e109343.
Monteiro, CA, Cannon, G, Moubarac, J-C et al. (2017) The UN Decade of Nutrition, the NOVA food classification and the trouble with ultra-processing. Public Health Nutr 21, Suppl. 1, 5–17.
Hoffmann, R (1991) Estatística para Economistas. São Paulo, SP: Livraria Pioneira Editora.
Afshin, A, Peñalvo, JL, Del Gobbo, L et al. (2017) The prospective impact of food pricing on improving dietary consumption: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One 12, Suppl. 3, e0172277.
Mendoza, A, Pérez, AE, Aggarwal, A et al. (2017) Energy density of foods and diets in Mexico and their monetary cost by socioeconomic strata: analyses of ENSANUT data 2012. J Epidemiol Community Health 71, 713–721.
Caro, JC, Ng, SW, Taillie, LS et al. (2017) Designing a tax to discourage unhealthy food and beverage purchases: the case of Chile. Food Policy 71, 86–100.
Monteiro, CA, Levy, RB, Claro, RM et al. (2011) Increasing consumption of ultra-processed foods and likely impact on human health: evidence from Brazil. Public Health Nutr 14, 5–13.
Van Langeveld, AWB, Gibbons, S, Koelliker, Y et al. (2017) The relationship between taste and nutrient content in commercially available foods from the United States. Food Qual Prefer 57, 1–7.
Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (2016) GBD Compare | Viz Hub. Graphic Arrow diagram: Global, Category all causes, Level one, Deaths and DALYs, Both sexes, All ages, 2017. https://vizhub.healthdata.org/gbd-compare/ (accessed September 2018).
Wright, A, Smith, KE & Hellowell, M (2017) Policy lessons from health taxes: a systematic review of empirical studies. BMC Public Health 17, 583.
Ng, SW, Rivera, JA, Popkin, BM et al. (2018) Did high sugar-sweetened beverage purchasers respond differently to the excise tax on sugar-sweetened beverages in Mexico? Public Health Nutr. Published online: 18 December 2018. doi: 10.1017/S136898001800321X.
Nakamura, R, Mirelman, AJ, Cuadrado, C et al. (2018) Evaluating the 2014 sugar-sweetened beverage tax in Chile: an observational study in urban areas. PLoS Med 15, Suppl. 7, e1002596.
Carlson, A & Frazão, E (2012) Are Healthy Foods Really More Expensive? It Depends on How You Measure the Price. Economic Information Bulletin no. 96. Washington, DC: US Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.