Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vvkck Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T05:37:42.941Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The social and environmental dimensions of nutrition science

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2007

Massimo Pettoello-Mantovani*
Affiliation:
Institute of Pediatrics, Centre for Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition, University of Foggia, Viale Pinto 1, I-71100, Foggia, Italy
*
*Corresponding author: Email mpm@medicina.unifg.it
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Objective

To emphasise the importance of defining a new nutrition science and food policy that includes social and environmental dimensions.

Design

Nutrition science and food policy is put in the context of sustainable development. Examples are presented to show that a number of factors including exploitation of resources, disrespect for land and food insecurity contribute to the decline of a culture. The fate of cultures that lack implemented sustainable development strategies is discussed.

Conclusion

Pressure from low-income and economically challenged countries combined with the efforts of not-for-profit private institutions is proposed. The goal is to produce and provide science-based evidence and guidelines to be used as a tool to encourage institutions and organisations to redefine their policies to deal effectively with global issues.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2005

References

1Wahlqvist, ML, Specht, RL. Food variety and biodiversity: eco nutrition. Asia Pacific Journal Clinical Nutrition 1998; 7: 314–9.Google Scholar
2Stavins, RN. Harnessing market forces to protect the environment. Environment 1989; 31: 2835.Google Scholar
3Sterner, T. Policy Instruments for Environmental and Natural Resource Management. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future, Inc., 2003.Google Scholar
4Stewart, RB. Controlling environmental risks through economic incentives. Columbia Journal of Environmental Law 1988; 13: 153–69.Google Scholar
5Cannon, G. The Fate of Nations. London: Caroline Walker Trust, 2003.Google Scholar
6Oates, WP, Portney, PR. The political economy of environmental policy. In: Maler, K-G, Vincent, J, eds. Handbook of Environmental Economics, Vol. 1. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2003; 325–54.Google Scholar
7Anderson, FR. Environmental Improvement through Economic Incentives. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press for Resources for the Future, Inc., 1977.Google Scholar
8McNeely, JA. Economics and Biological Diversity: Developing and Using Economic Incentives to Conserve Biological Resources. Gland, Switzerland: The World Conservation Union (IUCN), 1988.Google Scholar
9Montgomery, CA. Pricing biodiversity. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 1999; 38: 119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10Dasgupta, P. Economic value of biodiversity, overview. In: Levin, SA, ed. Encyclopedia of Biodiversity, Vol. 2. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, 2001; 291303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11Tietenberg, TH. Pricing the Planet: Economic Analysis for Sustainable Development. New York: Columbia University Press, 1996; 123–38.Google Scholar
12Tietenberg, TH. Economic instruments for environmental regulation. Oxford Review of Economic Policy 1990; 6: 1733.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13Nichols, AL. Targeting Economic Incentives for Environmental Protection. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1984.Google Scholar
14Hall, C, Cleveland, J, Kaufman, R. Energy and Resource Quality, the Ecology of the Economic Process. Denver, CO: University Press of Colorado, 1986.Google Scholar
15Helm, D. Economic Policy toward the Environment. Oxford, UK: Blackwell, 1991.Google Scholar
16Krawinkel, M. Pediatric care and the problems of nutritional deficiencies. In: Polak, G, ed. Medicine and Health-Course Catalog 2005. Vienna: Going International Information Services, 2004.Google Scholar
17Nestle, M. Safe Food: Bacteria, Biotechnology, and Bioterror-ism. Berkeley and Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press, 2003.Google Scholar