Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

On the appropriate use and interpretation of dietary diversity scores. Response to: ‘Farm production diversity and individual-level dietary diversity’ by Koppmair and Qaim

  • Eric O Verger (a1), Andrew D Jones (a2), Marie-Claude Dop (a1) and Yves Martin-Prével (a1)
  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      On the appropriate use and interpretation of dietary diversity scores. Response to: ‘Farm production diversity and individual-level dietary diversity’ by Koppmair and Qaim
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      On the appropriate use and interpretation of dietary diversity scores. Response to: ‘Farm production diversity and individual-level dietary diversity’ by Koppmair and Qaim
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      On the appropriate use and interpretation of dietary diversity scores. Response to: ‘Farm production diversity and individual-level dietary diversity’ by Koppmair and Qaim
      Available formats
      ×

Abstract

  • An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided below. To view the full text please use the links above to select your preferred format.

Copyright

Corresponding author

References

Hide All
1. Koppmair, S & Qaim, M (2017) Farm production diversity and individual-level dietary diversity. Response to: ‘Not all dietary diversity scores can legitimately be interpreted as proxies of diet quality’ by Verger et al. (Letter to the Editor). Public Health Nutr (Epublication ahead of print version).
2. Verger, EO, Dop, MC & Martin-Prével, Y (2016) Not all dietary diversity scores can legitimately be interpreted as proxies of diet quality (Letter to the Editor). Public Health Nutr (Epublication ahead of print version).
3. Jones, AD, Shrinivas, A & Bezner Kerr, R (2014) Farm production diversity is associated with greater household dietary diversity in Malawi: findings from nationally representative data. Food Policy 46, 112.
4. Hoddinott, J & Yohannes, Y (2002) Dietary Diversity as a Household Food Security Indicator. Washington, DC: FHI 360/Food and Nutrition Technical Assistance III Project.
5. Swindale, A & Bilinsky, P (2006) Household Dietary Diversity Score (HDDS) for Measurement of Household Food Access: Indicator Guide (V.2). Washington, DC: FHI 360/Food and Nutrition Technical Assistance III Project.
6. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations & FHI 360 (2016) Minimum Dietary Diversity for Women: A Guide for Measurement. Rome: FAO.
7. Leroy, JL, Ruel, M, Frongillo, EA et al. (2015) Measuring the food access dimension of food security: a critical review and mapping of indicators. Food Nutr Bull 36, 167195.
8. Haddad, L, Hoddinott, J & Alderman, H (1997) Introduction: The scope of intrahousehold resource allocation issues. In Intrahousehold Resource Allocation in Developing Countries: Models, Methods and Policy, pp. 116 [L Haddad, J Hoddinott and H Alderman, editors]. Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute.
9. Leroy, JL, Razak, AA & Habicht, JP (2008) Only children of the head of household benefit from increased household food diversity in northern Ghana. J Nutr 138, 22582263.
10. Haddad, L, Pena, C, Nishida, C et al. (1996) Food Security and Nutrition Implications of Intrahousehold Bias: A Review of Literature. FCND Discussion Paper no. 19. Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute.
11. Jones, AD (2016) On-farm crop species richness is associated with household dietary diversity and daily per capita energy and micronutrient intakes among subsistence- and market-oriented farming households in Malawi. J Nutr (Epublication ahead of print version).

On the appropriate use and interpretation of dietary diversity scores. Response to: ‘Farm production diversity and individual-level dietary diversity’ by Koppmair and Qaim

  • Eric O Verger (a1), Andrew D Jones (a2), Marie-Claude Dop (a1) and Yves Martin-Prével (a1)

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed