Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-995ml Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-19T10:09:20.647Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Food insecurity and depression among low-income adults in the USA: does diet diversity play a role? Findings from the 2013–2014 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 November 2020

Marie-Rachelle Narcisse*
Affiliation:
College of Medicine, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences Northwest, 1125 N College Ave, Fayetteville, AR 72703, USA
Holly C Felix
Affiliation:
Fay W. Boozman College of Public Health, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA
Christopher R Long
Affiliation:
College of Medicine, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences Northwest, 1125 N College Ave, Fayetteville, AR 72703, USA
Emily S English
Affiliation:
College of Medicine, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences Northwest, 1125 N College Ave, Fayetteville, AR 72703, USA
Mary M Bailey
Affiliation:
Office of Community Health and Research, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences Northwest, Fayetteville, AR, USA
Pearl A McElfish
Affiliation:
College of Medicine, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences Northwest, 1125 N College Ave, Fayetteville, AR 72703, USA
*
*Corresponding author: Email narcissem@uams.edu
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objective:

Food insecurity is associated with a greater risk of depression among low-income adults in the USA. Members of food-insecure households have lower diet diversity than their food-secure counterparts. This study examined whether diet diversity moderates the association between food insecurity and depression.

Design:

Multiple logistic regression was conducted to examine independent associations between food insecurity and depression, between diet diversity and depression, and the moderating effect of diet diversity in the food insecurity–depression link.

Setting:

Cross-sectional data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (2013–2014).

Participants:

2636 low-income adults aged 18 years and older.

Results:

There was a positive association between food insecurity and depression among low-income adults. Diet diversity was not associated with depression. Diet diversity had a moderating effect on the association between food insecurity and depression among low-income adults.

Conclusions:

Food insecurity is independently associated with depression among low-income adults in the USA. However, this association differs across levels of diet diversity. Longitudinal studies are needed to confirm the role diet diversity may play in the pathway between food insecurity and depression.

Type
Research paper
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Nutrition Society

Food insecurity is associated with adverse outcomes for the psychological and somatic health of adults and children across the world(Reference Coleman-Jensen, Rabbitt and Gregory1Reference Gundersen and Ziliak5). Food insecurity is associated with a wide range of chronic diseases influenced by diet, including hypertension, diabetes and hyperlipidaemia(Reference Holben and Pheley6,Reference Seligman, Laraia and Kushel7) .

Poor diet quality found in food insecurity has a well-established relationship with depression(Reference Gundersen and Ziliak5,Reference Althoff, Ametti and Bertmann8Reference Maynard, Andrade and Packull-McCormick10) . Although the association between food insecurity and depression is well documented(Reference Gundersen and Ziliak5,Reference Althoff, Ametti and Bertmann8,Reference Beydoun and Wang11Reference Laraia, Siega-Riz and Gundersen18) , the mechanisms of this association are not well understood(Reference Lai, Hiles and Bisquera19). A meta-analysis by Li and colleagues reports that high consumption of processed and refined foods and low intake of fruits and vegetables are associated with an increased risk of depression(Reference Li, Lv and Wei20).

Diet diversity, as defined by Vadiveloo and colleagues’ Healthy Food Diversity Index, includes dietary variety, quality and proportionality (i.e. distribution of food groups in the diet)(Reference Vadiveloo, Dixon and Mijanovich21). Diet diversity is positively associated with improved nutritional intake in adults and children(Reference Bernstein, Tucker and Ryan22,Reference Arimond and Ruel23) and negatively associated with obesity and fat mass in adults(Reference Vadiveloo, Dixon and Mijanovich24), although previous research is limited to low-to-middle-income countries(Reference Arimond and Ruel23,Reference Onyango25Reference Hooshmand and Udipi27) . Members of food-insecure households often skip meals, reduce energetic intake, avoid food waste and make cost/satiety trade-offs to address inadequate food supply(Reference Seligman and Schillinger28Reference Drewnowski30). These compensatory strategies negatively impact diet diversity. Research has shown that individuals who are food-insecure have lower diet quality and diet diversity than their food-secure counterparts(Reference Champagne, Casey and Connell31Reference Leung, Epel and Ritchie33) and tend to have a suboptimal intake of micronutrients(Reference Laraia29,Reference Davison, Gondara and Kaplan34-Reference Marshall, Stumbo and Warren38) .

The relationship between diet quality and depression has been primarily limited to analysing Healthy Eating Index (HEI) scores(Reference Appelhans, Whited and Schneider39) and dietary patterns(Reference Quirk, Williams and O’Neil40). The HEI is a tool for measuring diet quality as it relates to the Dietary Guidelines for Americans (DGA)(41,Reference Krebs-Smith, Pannucci and Subar42) . HEI scores have been associated with depression incidence and severity of depressive symptoms(Reference Gibson-Smith, Bot and Brouwer17,Reference Beydoun, Kuczmarski and Mason43) , but HEI scores do not account for the proportions of types of foods consumed or diet variety beyond the thirteen DGA food groups(Reference Reedy, Lerman and Krebs-Smith44). Dietary pattern analysis examines the overall combinations of foods consumed and groups the patterns into recognised categories(Reference Willett and McCullough45). Dietary patterns have been associated with depression risk(Reference Ruusunen, Lehto and Mursu46), but dietary pattern analyses are limited to explicitly defined diets, such as the Mediterranean or Western diets(Reference Lai, Hiles and Bisquera19,Reference Li, Lv and Wei20) . This study uses the Healthy Food Diversity Index (US HFD), which goes beyond the HEI’s measure of diet quality; it provides scoring on diet diversity across twenty-six food groups and incorporates proportions of the food categories consumed(Reference Vadiveloo, Dixon and Mijanovich21).

Conceptual framework

Defining Diet Diversity

Several authors have called for new healthy diet diversity indices(Reference Onyango25,Reference Randall, Nichaman and Contant47Reference Vadiveloo, Dixon and Parekh50) as existing indicators do not consider measures of dietary quality and proportionality in their assessments. Consequently, Vadiveloo and colleagues developed the US HFD index that considers three key aspects of a varied diet simultaneously, namely, dietary variety, quality and proportionality of foods(Reference Vadiveloo, Dixon and Mijanovich51). To construct the US HFD index, the authors adapted the validated German HFD index to the 2010 DGA(Reference Drescher, Thiele and Mensink52). The German HFD is a modification of the Berry Index, a measure used in economic studies to assess diversity in terms of the number and distribution of different food items(Reference Thiele and Weiss53). The German HFD adapted the Berry Index so that the highest index value corresponds to individuals consuming the recommended food group shares. The index increases if the distribution of foods moves in favour of healthier foods and reflects the health value of consumed foods. The US HFD index incorporates weights which capture proportionality by penalising consumption of a single high-quality food group or equal consumption of all food groups. This ensures that neither a high health value nor a high Berry Index can independently generate a high US HFD index. The US HFD scores increase by consuming a higher proportion of foods from more healthful food groups, whereas scores decrease when less healthful food groups are consumed in higher proportions. From a public health standpoint, this scoring method brings about a wider assortment of healthy foods which promotes a diverse diet favourably associated with good health(Reference Vadiveloo, Dixon and Mijanovich24,Reference Vadiveloo, Parkeh and Mattei54,Reference Vadiveloo, Parekh and Mattei55) .

The role of diet diversity in the food insecurity–depression link

Associations between household food insecurity and depression are well established; however, there is less literature regarding the mechanisms by which food insecurity affects depression. To help fill this gap, two potential mechanisms were considered: First, food insecurity could have an adverse impact on depression through a direct effect of nutritional shortfalls(Reference Bhattacharya, Currie and Haider56Reference Heflin and Ziliak58). For example, in an experimental study of 1081 healthy men, Heseker and colleagues found that reduced intake of vitamins over 2 months was associated with increased feelings of fear, irritability, nervousness, depression, decreased memory and well-being. These adverse symptoms were reversed as soon as the participants resumed vitamin intake(Reference Heseker, Kubler and Pudel59). However, this direct effect could be mediated by diet diversity. In their study on 330 multi-ethnic, low-income women, Dressler and Smith (2015) found that food-insecure women had a higher energetic intake and consumed more servings of discretionary foods, such as fat and sugar, which appeared to be partially mediated through the increased emotional eating among depressed participants(Reference Dressler and Smith37). This approach suggests that some of the mechanisms by which food insecurity adversely affects mental health outcomes are indirect. Food-insecure adults may consume more highly palatable but poorer quality foods, leading to poorer diet diversity and increased risks of depression. However, this approach would suppose a chronicity of effects that would need to be captured over time.

Another potential mechanism is that diet diversity could have a potential moderating effect in the association between food insecurity and depression. Vadiveloo proposed the Adapted Sensory-Specific Satiety model of eating behaviour, which postulates that diet diversity is driven by a greater satisfaction associated with consuming a variety of food items rather than consuming a single food item. This model is supported by research that has shown that diet diversity promotes enjoyment and satisfaction(Reference Marshall, Stumbo and Warren38,Reference Clausen, Charlton and Gobotswang60) . In contrast, a less diverse diet may decrease satisfaction and affect depression. In terms of a moderating effect, our goal was to examine the association between food insecurity and depression at differing levels of diet diversity.

Research objectives

The purpose of this study was to understand the role of diet diversity in the association between food insecurity and depression among low-income adults in the USA. The three specific aims of the study were to: examine the association between food insecurity and depression; examine the association between diet diversity and depression; and examine whether diet diversity moderates the association between food insecurity and depression.

Figure 1 details the conceptual framework with relationships among food insecurity (independent variable), diet diversity (moderating variable) and depression (dependent variable) in low-income adults. Our hypotheses are: first, there is a positive association between food insecurity and depression; second, there is a positive association between a lack of diet diversity and depression; third, there is a moderating effect of a lack of diet diversity in the association between food insecurity and depression.

Fig. 1 Proposed association between food insecurity, diet diversity and depression. (–) Inhibiting effect; (+) reinforcing effect

Materials and methods

Data source

National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey

This study used data from the 2013–2014 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES), the most recent version of NHANES that gathered data on food security at the time this study was conducted. The survey is conducted by the National Center for Health Statistics of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The NHANES is a nationally representative, population-based survey that assesses the health and nutritional status of adults and children in the USA. NHANES dietary data are used to describe the intake of foods, nutrients, food groups and dietary patterns by the US population. The nutritional assessment component of the NHANES includes a 24-h dietary recall interview of participants of all ages. A second dietary interview of all participants who complete the in-person recall was collected by telephone and is scheduled 3–10 d later(Reference Chen, Parker and Clark61).

Food Patterns Equivalents Database

The NHANES analytic file was combined with the 2013–2014 Food Patterns Equivalents Database. The Food Patterns Equivalents Database, created by the US Department of Agriculture, translates individual food files from the 2013–2014 NHANES dietary data into their equivalent food group amounts. Foods in the NHANES food files are converted into cup equivalents of fruit, vegetables and dairy; ounce equivalents of grains and protein foods; teaspoon equivalents of added sugars and gram equivalents of solid fats and oils(Reference Bowman, Clemens and Friday62).

Study population

For the 2013–2014 survey, the National Center for Health Statistics included 10 175 individuals (unweighted response rate of 71 %) using a multistage, area cluster design with differential selection probabilities for designated demographic groups(Reference Manganello and Blake63).

The analytic sample for the present study was constructed using combined data from the NHANES demographics, dietary, examination, laboratory and questionnaire files. We restricted our analysis to a sample of adults from households where there was a reasonable chance of having high food insecurity. We selected individuals below 300 % of the Federal poverty line (FPL) to obtain a sufficient sample size and variation in food insecurity status as applied in other research(Reference Gregory and Coleman-Jensen64). Furthermore, we wanted to focus on lower-income adults as they are the most-at-risk group to experience food insecurity(Reference Gundersen, Kreider and Pepper65) and depression(Reference Leung, Epel and Ritchie33,Reference Weaver and Hadley66) and determine whether diet diversity would mitigate the influence of food insecurity on depression in this high-risk group; respondents over 18 years of age, with energy intakes ≥400–<7000 kcal/d and 2 days of dietary recall data were included(Reference Vadiveloo, Dixon and Mijanovich21), and pregnant and lactating women were not considered because their nutrient needs differ from those of non-pregnant and non-lactating women(Reference Laraia, Siega-Riz and Gundersen18,Reference Hromi-Fiedler, Bermudez-Millan and Segura-Perez67) . The final analytic sample included 2636 adults, representing noninstitutionalised low-income civilian adults aged 18 years and older residing in the fifty states and the District of Columbia. Because we selected participants with completed 2-d dietary recall data, we applied sampling weights that adjust for nonresponse to the dietary component and incorporated the day of the week of recall. Additional details of NHANES sampling design and interviewing procedures are described elsewhere(Reference Chen, Parker and Clark61,68,Reference Ahluwalia, Dwyer and Terry69) .

Measures

The measures used to characterise participants are shown in Table 1.

Table 1 Describing depression, food insecurity and lack of diet diversity among low-income adults in the USA

* Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9).

Lack of diet diversity ranges from 0·510 (more diversity) to (0·985) less diversity. It was calculated as 1-USHFS. Significance for US HFD (not shown here) are the same as those of the reversed scores (1-US HFD) presented in Table 1.

Cell sample sizes are not weighted. Estimates (percentages and means) are weighted. Thus, the weighted estimates would not correspond to the underweight ‘n’ in the cells. Estimates do not account for missing data.

§ Statistically significant unadjusted associations between categorical variables (e.g. sex and education) and depression or food insecurity were determined with the Rao–Chi-Square test of independence. Associations between continuous variables (continuous age) and depression or food diversity were determined with t test statistic.

The analytic unweighted sample size n 2636 represents non-pregnant, non-lactating, low income (≤300 % Federal Poverty level) adults noninstitutionalised civilian adults who have completed 2 d of dietary recall (weighted population N 112 328 599).

Respondents aged greater than 80 years are set with an age of 80 years in NHANES data for confidentiality reasons.

** HS/GED: High school/General Education Development.

†† Vitamin D Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D(25(OH)D) (25OHD2 + 25OHD3) using thresholds recommended by the Endocrine Society(Reference Holick, Binkley and Bischoff-Ferrari102) as vitamin D deficiency (VDD) defined as 25(OH)D < 50 nmol/l and vitamin D insufficiency (VDI) as 50 ≤ 25(OH)D < 75nmol/l.

Depression

Depression was the dependent variable. The NHANES used the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9)(Reference Kroenke, Spitzer and Williams70,Reference Kroenke and Spitzer71) , a self-reported nine-item screening instrument, to determine the frequency of depression symptoms (i.e. sadness, trouble sleeping, fatigue, problems concentrating) over the past 2 weeks among participants. The PHQ-9 is a well-validated instrument with moderate concordance with clinical psychiatric interviews(Reference Kroenke, Spitzer and Williams70,Reference Montgomery, Lu and Ratliff72) . Each item was assessed on a four-point Likert scale ranging from 0 ‘Not at all’ to 3 ‘Nearly every day.’ Before summing the PHQ-9 items, we conducted a factor analysis to assess the unidimensionality of the items and computed a scale reliability coefficient to assess their internal consistency. Cronbach’s alpha (α = 0·99) indicated very high internal consistency. We dichotomised the summative 0–27 quasi-interval scale into a binary indicator with 0 = PHQ-9 score < 10 or 1 = PHQ-9 score ≥ 10 (elevated depressive symptoms), as applied in other research(Reference Kroenke, Spitzer and Williams70).

Food insecurity

Food insecurity status was the primary independent variable. An adult in the NHANES-sampled household was administered the ten-item food security instrument. A food security score (0–10) was created to represent the number of affirmative responses to the food security items. Following procedures used by CDC and US Department of Agriculture, answers of ‘Often true’, ‘Sometimes true’ and ‘Yes’ were considered affirmative responses to being food-insecure. Responses to items 5 and 10 regarding the frequency of occurrence in the past 30 d were considered affirmative to being food-insecure if the respondent’s answer was ≥3 d(Reference Bickel, Nord and Price73).

Diet diversity

In the study, diet diversity was analysed as an independent and as a moderating variable. Diet diversity was measured with Vadiveloo et al.’s (2014) US HFD(Reference Vadiveloo, Dixon and Mijanovich21,Reference Vadiveloo, Dixon and Mijanovich24) . This index captures dietary variety (number of foods), quality (concordance with the 2010 DGA) and proportionality (distribution of food groups in the diet). The index ranges between 0 (a diet with a single food) and nearly 1 (a diet with many types of food). To generate the US HFD, Vadiveloo et al. used the following equation:

$${\rm{US\;HFD}} = \left( {1 - {\sum }s_i^2} \right) \times hv$$

where s i is the share or proportion of each individual food or food group i based on the volume of the total diet.

$$hv\; = {\rm{\sum }}h{f_{i\;}}\; \times {s_i}$$

where hf i are ‘health factors’, or weights, developed by Vadiveloo et al. for each food group using qualitative and quantitative recommendations for daily food group intakes based on the 2000-kcal US Department of Agriculture Food Pattern in the 2010 DGA (See Vadiveloo et al., 2014, Table 1, p.1565(Reference Vadiveloo, Dixon and Mijanovich21)). Health values were obtained by multiplying the reported share by the volume of each food by its respective health factors and summing them to capture diet quality and proportionality. The methodology to build the US HFD is detailed elsewhere(Reference Vadiveloo, Dixon and Mijanovich21).

Because the focus of the study is on a lack of diet diversity, we reversed the obtained diet diversity score (1-US HFD) so that a higher score indicates less diet diversity.

Covariates

From previous studies, we included several covariates that could confound the association between food insecurity and depression: sex, age, race/ethnicity, BMI, marital status, citizenship status, education attainment, household income, employment status, homeownership and serum vitamin D(Reference Seligman, Laraia and Kushel7,Reference Okechukwu, El Ayadi and Tamers14,Reference Leung, Epel and Ritchie33,Reference Anglin, Samaan and Walter74Reference Wahlqvist76) .

Statistical analysis

Descriptive analysis

Stata/se 16(77) svy procedures were used to estimate parameters and adjust for NHANES complex stratified multistage-area-probability sampling. Rather than excluding participants, we created a study subpopulation for the estimation. STATA/se 16 has features for design-based analysis of subpopulation analysis for complex sample survey data(Reference West, Berglund and Heeringa78). Since 2013–2014 NHANES and 2013–2014 Food Patterns Equivalents Database are public and de-identified files, the University of Arkansas for Medical Science’s IRB exempted the study.

We did not detect any multicollinearity among the independent variables in our study (all variance inflator factors were < 1·50, with an overall variance inflator factor mean of 1·20).

We computed weighted percentages for all categorical socio-demographic and health variables across levels of food insecurity and depression. The Rao–Scott χ 2 test of independence, which adjusts for sampling design, was used to determine statistically significant unadjusted associations(Reference Rao and Scott79). For the variable lack of diet diversity (1-US HFD), we computed weighted means. The t test was used to determine statistically significant differences in lack of diet diversity means across socio-demographic and health measures. We further computed weighted means over 2 d of each food group across levels of food insecurity and depression (see Supplemental materials).

Regression analysis

We conducted logistic regression to determine the association between food insecurity and lack of diet diversity (main independent effects) on depression. In model 1, depression was regressed on food insecurity. In model 2, depression was regressed on lack of diet diversity (1-US HFD). In model 3, depression was regressed on both independent variables controlling for all potential confounders. Unadjusted and adjusted associations were presented as OR, with corresponding standard errors (se). We computed the Archer–Lemeshow global goodness-of-fit test statistic – which takes the survey sampling design into account – to examine the adequacy of the logistic models(Reference Archer and Lemeshow80).

To assess moderation, model 4 included all variables in model 3 and an interactive product term between food security and diet diversity. However, the interpretation of interaction terms in nonlinear models is challenging: in a logit model without interaction, the interpretation of a coefficient is the natural logarithm of the OR. The coefficient of the interaction terms is thus the natural logarithm of the ratio of two OR(Reference Karaca-Mandic, Norton and Dowd81). Furthermore, the sign of this coefficient is also not easily interpretable: when the focal and the moderator variables are both measured on a continuous scale, the marginal effect of one variable on the conditional probability that the outcome = 1 can have a positive or negative sign over the range of the other variable. A significant interaction would indicate that the effect of the food security is not the same for different values of diet diversity, but neither the value nor the sign of the estimates for the main effects and interaction terms would give clear information about the nature of the interactions. Hence, marginal effects were computed and then plotted to probe the interaction effect of food security and diet diversity on the predicted probability of depression(Reference Hayes82).

Complete case analysis was conducted for all models, and statistical significance was set at a two-tailed alpha level of 0·05.

Results

Describing the relation between socio-demographic factors and food insecurity

Table 1 describes the study population of adults living in households with income <300 % FPL by socio-demographic characteristics as well as unadjusted associations.

On a range of 0–10, the mean food insecurity score was 1·55 (se 0·09). Food-insecure adults were on average younger than non-food-insecure adults (mean age 41 years v. 46 years, t = 6·49; P < 0·001). Significant differences were seen across race/ethnicity groups (F (3·49,52·40) = 3·01; P < 0·001). Mexican Americans and other Hispanic adults had a high prevalence of food insecurity (35·6 and 33·9 %), whereas Asians had a low prevalence of food insecurity (12·7 %). Significant differences were found by BMI categories (F (3·44,51·58) = 2·64; P = 0·05): about a third of very obese people (32·4 %) were food-insecure compared with 28·0 % of healthy weight adults. Food insecurity was also significantly negatively associated with socio-economic characteristics – education (F (1·80,27·05) = 4·86; P = 0·018); household income (F (1,15) = 8·23; P = 0·012) and homeownership (P < 0·001) – none of which was associated with depression. Although the level of vitamin D was not significantly associated with depression in our study population, we did find a significant association between vitamin D level and food insecurity (F (1·85,27·81) = 9·15; P < 0·001). A third of adults with deficient levels of vitamin D (25OHD2 + 25OHD3 < 50 nmol/l) were food-insecure.

Describing the relation between socio-demographic factors and depression

Overall, 11·8 % of adults living in households <300 % of the FPL were considered depressed (i.e. PHQ ≥ 10). Depressed adults were, on average, older than non-depressed adults (mean age 50 years v. 44 years; t = –3·66; P = 0·002). A higher proportion of women were depressed than men (14·1 % v. 9·2 %; F (1,15) = 11.80; P = 0·004). Significant differences were seen across race/ethnicity groups (F (3·35,50·31) = 3·69; P = 0·015). Mexican Americans and Asians had a low prevalence of depression (7·5 and 4·4 %, respectively), and adults of other/multiple races had a high prevalence of depression (20·1 %). Significant disparities in depressive symptoms were found across levels of BMI (F (3·16,47·42) = 5·45; P = 0·002). The prevalence of depression was higher among citizen adults than non-citizens (12·5 % v. 5·7 %, F (1,15) = 16·58; P = 0·001). The prevalence of depression was also lower among employed individuals than non-employed ones (6·2 % v. 18·1 %, F (1,15) = 29·52; P < 0·001). No significant associations were seen for marital status, education, household income, homeownership or level of vitamin D (P > 0·05).

Describing the relation between socio-demographic factors and lack of diet diversity

For the overall US HFD, we found a weighted mean of 0·33 (se 0·003) over the 2-d recall period. Inversely, lack of diet diversity (1-US HFD) had a mean of 0·67 (se 0·002) and ranged from 0·510 (more diversity) to 0·985 (less diversity). The difference between the US HFD mean for low-income adults with depression v. those without depression was not statistically significant (mean 0·67 (se 0·002) v. mean 0·67 (se 0·006); t = –0·03, P = 0·975).

Four factors were associated with a lack of diet diversity: age (inverse association, P = 0·028); sex (females had more diverse diets than males: mean 0·0668 v. 0·678, t = –2·43; P = 0·028); race/ethnicity (t = 3·39; P = 0·004) with non-Hispanic Blacks having the least diverse diet and vitamin D level (t = –4·41; P = 0·001) with adults with deficient level 25OHD2 + 25OHD3 < 50 nmol/l having the highest score in lack of diet diversity. See Table 1.

Explaining the relation between food insecurity, lack of diet diversity and depression

The logistic regression (model 1) showed that food insecurity was positively associated with depression (OR 1·10, se 0·03; P = 0·002). For the association between lack of diet diversity and depression (model 2), the association was not significant (OR 1·05, se 1·61; P = 0·975). The Archer–Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test(Reference Archer and Lemeshow80) indicated that the data did not fit these two simple models well: model 1: (F (3,13) = 6·280; P = 0·007) and model 2 (F (9,7) = 0·010). In model 3 – in which depression was regressed on food insecurity and lack of diet diversity adjusting for confounders – multiple logistic regression showed that food insecurity was still positively and independently associated with depression (OR 1·10, se 0·04; P = 0·007). Lack of diet diversity was not associated with depression (OR 1·08, se 1·66; P = 0·961). The Archer–Lemeshow suggested no evidence of lack of fit (F (9,7) = 1·862; P = 0·212) (Table 2).

Table 2 Association between food insecurity, lack of diet diversity and depression among low-income adults in the USA: odds ratios (OR) and standard errors (se)

Model 3 is adjusted for sex, age, race/ethnicity, BMI, marital status, citizenship status, education attainment, household income, employment status, homeownership and vitamin D. Model 4 is not shown here. Archer–Lemeshow (F-adjusted statistic): Goodness-of-fit test for logistic regression model fitted using survey data. It tests the null hypothesis that the fitted model is correct. Higher values of P-values indicate a better fit.

Sources: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS). 2013–2014-National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey Data. Hyattsville, MD: US Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. FPED: 2013–2014 Food Patterns Equivalents Database. US Department of Agriculture.

The potential moderating effect of a lack of diet diversity was examined by including a product term (food insecurity × lack of diet diversity) (model 4). Since the estimate for interaction was significant at the 0·05 alpha level, and the Archer–Lemeshow (F-adjusted statistic) showed that model 4 provided the best fit of fitted models (F (9,7) = 0·887; P = 0·577), we plotted the marginal effects of the interaction of food security and diet diversity to interpret the moderation effect in a meaningful way(Reference Royston83). As shown in Fig. 2, at the intersection of a food security score of 2, the predicted probability of depression increases for all levels of diet diversity, but at differing gradient levels. For adults with the lowest level of diet diversity, the probability of depression increased more rapidly than for those who consume a more diverse diet.

Fig. 2 The moderating effect of food diversity in the association between food security and depression: plotting the predicted probabilities. 0·5; 0·6; 0·7; 0·8; 0·9; 1

Source: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). NationalCenter for Health Statistics (NCHS). 2013–2014-National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey Data. Hyattsville, MD: US Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. FPED: 2013–2014 Food Patterns Equivalents Database. US Department of Agriculture. Note: This graph depicts the predicted probabilities obtained from calculating the marginal effects from Model 4. The estimate of the interaction was statistically significant P < 0·001.

Discussion

This study examined the association between food insecurity and depression; the association between a lack of diet diversity and depression; and the moderating effect of diet diversity in the association between food insecurity and depression among low-income adults in the USA in order to identify the mechanism through which food insecurity relates to depression.

This study found that 11·8 % of adults below 300 % of the poverty line were depressed and 26·6 % were food-insecure. After confounding risk factors were controlled for, food-insecure adults were twice as likely to report being depressed, compared with food-secure adults. This relation is consistent with previous analyses that have found associations between depression and food insecurity in adults(Reference Maynard, Andrade and Packull-McCormick10,Reference Martin, Maddocks and Chen84,Reference Arenas, Thomas and Wang85) , especially among adults in low-income households(Reference Hromi-Fiedler, Bermudez-Millan and Segura-Perez67,Reference Garg, Toy and Tripodis86Reference Carter, Krus and Blakely92) .

The mean US HFD score was 0·33 (se 0·003), a mean score very similar to what Vadiveloo et al. (2014) found with analysis of 2003–2006 NHANES data and MyPyramid equivalents (mean 0·34 (se 0·002))(Reference Vadiveloo, Dixon and Mijanovich21). We did not find a significant association between a lack of diet diversity and depression in both unadjusted and adjusted models. This non-significance is contrary to our hypothesis, and contrary to a meta-analysis of twenty-one studies from ten countries that suggested a healthy diet pattern may decrease the risk of depression(Reference Li, Lv and Wei20), and a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies using an array of dietary measures(Reference Lassale, Batty and Baghdadli93). However, the primary focus of the study was on examining the mechanisms by which food security influences depression among low-income adults, and positing diet diversity as the measure used to investigate this mechanism through moderation rather than mediation.

The results demonstrated that diet diversity played a moderating role in the relation between food insecurity and depression. At lower levels of food insecurity (0–2), diet diversity does not seem to exert a moderating impact on the link food insecurity–depression. However, as hypothesised, the association between food insecurity and depression is magnified by diminishing levels of diet diversity. Although diet diversity is not independently associated with depression, as could be deduced from the Adapted Sensory-Specific Satiety model of eating behaviour(Reference Vadiveloo94), our findings suggest that the consumption of diverse healthy food buffers the influence of food insecurity on the likelihood of depression, and conversely, lower levels of diet diversity may reinforce this impact. These findings are the first to show the moderating effect of diet diversity in the association between food insecurity and depression.

Limitations

Our findings should be interpreted in light of their limitations. Food insecurity, depression and dietary intake were self-reported. These self-report measures are subject to biases.

The 2013–2014 NHANES nonresponse rate of 29 % presents another limitation(95). Without information on the non-respondents, it was not possible to gauge the extent of nonresponse bias.

Omitted control variables constitute another limitation of this study. Some variables found to be associated with both depression and food insecurity (e.g. inability to pay for medical bills(Reference Tarasuk96), social support(Reference Maynard, Andrade and Packull-McCormick10), domestic violence(Reference Heflin, Siefert and Williams89,Reference Whitaker, Phillips and Orzol97) or environmental factors(Reference Saffel-Shrier, Johnson and Francis98), such as obesogenic, food access, rurality, neighbourhood safety and walkability) were not adjusted in regression models because they were not available.

This study posited food insecurity as leading to depression, that is, in regression models, depression was the dependent variable and food insecurity was one of the independent variables. In contrast, others have examined this association the other way around (i.e. reverse causality) treating food insecurity as the dependent variable and depression as one of the independent variables(Reference Garg, Toy and Tripodis86,Reference Noonan, Corman and Reichman99) . The cross-sectional design of this study limits the ability to ascertain causality and the bidirectional relationship between these two domains.

Future research

The scientific report of the 2015 Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee concluded that current evidence on the association of dietary patterns with depression is limited(100). Our study used a large population study of low-income adults to explore the moderating effect of diet diversity in the link between food insecurity and depression using a more comprehensive and more holistic diet diversity index. Future research may consider developing new measure of diet diversity.

As diet diversity changes with age(Reference Vandevijvere, De Vriese and Huybrechts101), the association between food insecurity, diet diversity and depression in younger population also merits further examination. While a lack of diet diversity was analysed as a moderator, future longitudinal studies should investigate its role as a mediator.

Methodologically, because secondary data analysis poses the problem of omitted confounders, our research indicates the need for experimental interventions to examine the association between food insecurity and depression with diet diversity. The possible reverse causality between food insecurity and depression needs to be further elucidated with longitudinal studies as this bidirectionality may obscure other potential mechanistic effect of diet diversity in this association.

Additional research is also needed to identify other possible influences and mechanisms in the associations between food insecurity and depression, namely the mediating effect of diet diversity. Understanding the specific mechanism by which food insecurity exerts its impact on depression can aid in developing interventions to improve the mental health of individuals who are food-insecure. Furthermore, our focus was on a subpopulation of <300 % FPL. Therefore, the findings from this research cannot be extrapolated to the whole US population, but rather to the subpopulation of <300 % FPL. Future research may include the whole US population to determine if the findings from this study still hold among other income groups.

Conclusion

Food security is independently associated with depression among low-income adults in the USA. However, this association differs by differing levels of diet diversity. This is the first study that shows the moderating effect of diet diversity in the association between food insecurity and depression.

Longitudinal studies are needed to confirm the role diet diversity may play in the pathway between food insecurity and depression.

Acknowledgements

Acknowledgements: Nothing to acknowledge. Financial support: None. Conflict of interest: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist. Authorship: M.-R.N.: Conceptualisation, methodology, software, data curation, investigation, formal analysis, visualisation and writing-original draft preparation. H.C.F.: Methodology, writing-review & editing. C.R.L.: Methodology, writing-review & editing. E.S.E.: Conceptualisation, writing-review & editing. P.A.Mc.: Conceptualisation, writing-review & editing. Ethics of human subject participation: The manuscript has not been submitted or published anywhere. The study has been exempted by the University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences’ IRB. Disclaimer: Analysis, interpretation and/or conclusions based on the NHANES are solely that of the authors and do not represent those of the National Center for Health Statistics, which are responsible for the quality of the data.

Supplementary material

For supplementary material accompanying this paper visit https://doi.org/10.1017/S1368980020004644

References

Coleman-Jensen, A, Rabbitt, MP, Gregory, CA et al. (2019) Household Food Security in the United States in 2018. Contract No. ERR-270. https://www.ers.usda.gov/webdocs/publications/94849/err-270.pdf (accessed March 2020).Google Scholar
Russell, JC, Flood, VM, Yeatman, H et al. (2016) Food security, diet quality and quality of life. Nutr Diet 73, 5058.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collaborators GDaIIaP (2018) Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 354 diseases and injuries for 195 countries and territories, 1990–2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet 392, 17891858.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holben, DH & Marshall, MB (2017) Position of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics: food Insecurity in the United States. J Acad Nutr Dietetics 117, 19912002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gundersen, C & Ziliak, JP (2015) Food insecurity and health outcomes. Health Affairs 34, 18301839.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Holben, DH & Pheley, AM (2006) Diabetes risk and obesity in food-insecure households in rural Appalachian Ohio. Prev Chronic Dis 3, A82.Google ScholarPubMed
Seligman, HK, Laraia, BA & Kushel, MB (2010) Food insecurity is associated with chronic disease among low-income NHANES participants. J Nutr 140, 304310.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Althoff, RR, Ametti, M & Bertmann, F (2016) The role of food insecurity in developmental psychopathology. Prev Med 92, 106109.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ivers, LC & Cullen, KA (2011) Food insecurity: special considerations for women. Am J Clin Nutr 94, 1740s1744s.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maynard, M, Andrade, L, Packull-McCormick, S et al. (2018) Food insecurity and mental health among females in high-income countries. Int J Environ Res Public Health 15, 1424.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beydoun, MA & Wang, Y (2010) Pathways linking socioeconomic status to obesity through depression and lifestyle factors among young US adults. J Affective Disorders 123, 5263.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Alaimo, K, Olson, CM & Frongillo, EA (2002) Family food insufficiency, but not low family income, is positively associated with dysthymia and suicide symptoms in adolescents. J Nutr 132, 719725.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, AD (2017) Food insecurity and mental health status: a Global Analysis of 149 Countries. Am J Prev Med 53, 264273.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Okechukwu, CA, El Ayadi, AM, Tamers, SL et al. (2012) Household food insufficiency, financial strain, work-family spillover, and depressive symptoms in the working class: the work, family, and health network study. Am J Public Health 102, 126133.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Muldoon, KA, Duff, PK, Fielden, S et al. (2013) Food insufficiency is associated with psychiatric morbidity in a nationally representative study of mental illness among food insecure Canadians. Soc Psychiatr Epidemiol 48, 795803.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laraia, BA, Borja, JB & Bentley, ME (2009) Grandmothers, fathers, and depressive symptoms are associated with food insecurity among low-income first-time African-American mothers in North Carolina. J Am Diet Assoc 109, 10421047.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gibson-Smith, D, Bot, M, Brouwer, IA et al. (2018) Diet quality in persons with and without depressive and anxiety disorders. J Psychiatr Res 106, 17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Laraia, BA, Siega-Riz, AM, Gundersen, C et al. (2006) Psychosocial factors and socioeconomic indicators are associated with household food insecurity among pregnant women. J Nutr 136, 177182.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lai, JS, Hiles, S, Bisquera, A et al. (2014) A systematic review and meta-analysis of dietary patterns and depression in community-dwelling adults. Am J Clin Nutr 99, 181197.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Li, Y, Lv, MR, Wei, YJ et al. (2017) Dietary patterns and depression risk: a meta-analysis. Psychiatr Res 253, 373382.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vadiveloo, M, Dixon, LB, Mijanovich, T et al. (2014) Development and evaluation of the US healthy food diversity index. Br J Nutr 112, 15621574.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bernstein, MA, Tucker, KL, Ryan, ND et al. (2002) Higher dietary variety is associated with better nutritional status in frail elderly people. J Am Diet Assoc 102, 10961104.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Arimond, M & Ruel, MT (2004) Dietary diversity is associated with child nutritional status: evidence from 11 demographic and health surveys. J Nutr 134, 25792585.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vadiveloo, M, Dixon, LB, Mijanovich, T et al. (2015) Dietary variety is inversely associated with body adiposity among US adults using a novel food diversity index. J Nutr 145, 555563.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Onyango, AW (2003) Dietary diversity, child nutrition and health in contemporary African communities. Comp Biochem Physiol A Mol Integr Physiol 136, 6169.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ey Chua, EY, Zalilah, MS, Ys Chin, YS et al. (2012) Dietary diversity is associated with nutritional status of Orang Asli children in Krau Wildlife Reserve, Pahang. Malaysian J Nutr 18 113.Google ScholarPubMed
Hooshmand, S & Udipi, SA (2013) Dietary diversity and nutritional status of urban primary school children from Iran and India. J Nutr Disorders Ther 12, 2161–0509.Google Scholar
Seligman, HK & Schillinger, D (2010) Hunger and socioeconomic disparities in chronic disease. N Engl J Med 363, 69.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Laraia, BA (2013) Food insecurity and chronic disease. Adv Nutr 4, 203212.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Drewnowski, A (2009) Obesity, diets, and social inequalities. Nutr Rev 1, S36S39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Champagne, CM, Casey, PH, Connell, CL et al. (2007) Poverty and food intake in rural America: diet quality is lower in food insecure adults in the Mississippi Delta. J Am Diet Assoc 107, 18861894.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Robaina, KA & Martin, KS (2013) Food insecurity, poor diet quality, and obesity among food pantry participants in Hartford, CT. J Nutr Educ Behav 45, 159164.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leung, CW, Epel, ES, Ritchie, LD et al. (2014) Food insecurity is inversely associated with diet quality of lower-income adults. J Acad Nutr Dietetics 114, 1943U329.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Davison, KM, Gondara, L & Kaplan, BJ (2017) Food insecurity, poor diet quality, and suboptimal intakes of folate and iron are independently associated with perceived mental health in Canadian adults. Nutrients 9, 274.Google ScholarPubMed
Morales, ME & Berkowitz, SA (2016) The relationship between food insecurity, dietary patterns, and obesity. Curr Nutr Rep 5, 5460.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hanson, KL & Connor, LM (2014) Food insecurity and dietary quality in US adults and children: a systematic review. Am J Clin Nutr 100, 684692.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dressler, H & Smith, C (2015) Depression affects emotional eating and dietary intake and is related to food insecurity in a group of multiethnic, low-income women. J Hunger Environ Nutr 10, 496510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshall, TA, Stumbo, PJ, Warren, JJ et al. (2001) Inadequate nutrient intakes are common and are associated with low diet variety in rural, community-dwelling elderly. J Nutr 131, 21922196.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Appelhans, BM, Whited, MC, Schneider, KL et al. (2012) Depression severity, diet quality, and physical activity in women with obesity and depression. J Acad Nutr Dietetics 112, 693698.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Quirk, SE, Williams, LJ, O’Neil, A et al. (2013) The association between diet quality, dietary patterns and depression in adults: a systematic review. BMC Psychiatr 13, 175.Google ScholarPubMed
US Department of Health and Human Services & US Department of Agriculture (2015) 2015–2020 Dietary Guidelines for Americans, 8th ed. Washington, DC: US Department of Health and Human Services.Google Scholar
Krebs-Smith, SM, Pannucci, TE, Subar, AF et al. (2018) Update of the Healthy Eating Index: HEI-2015. J Acad Nutr Dietetics 2018 118, 15911602.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beydoun, MA, Kuczmarski, MT, Mason, MA et al. (2009) Role of depressive symptoms in explaining socioeconomic status disparities in dietary quality and central adiposity among US adults: a structural equation modeling approach. Am J Clin Nutr 90, 10841095.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reedy, J, Lerman, JL, Krebs-Smith, SM et al. (2018) Evaluation of the Healthy Eating Index-2015. J Acad Nutr Dietetics 2018 118, 16221633.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Willett, WC & McCullough, ML (2008) Dietary pattern analysis for the evaluation of dietary guidelines. Asia Pac J Clin Nutr 1, 7578.Google Scholar
Ruusunen, A, Lehto, SM, Mursu, J et al. (2014) Dietary patterns are associated with the prevalence of elevated depressive symptoms and the risk of getting a hospital discharge diagnosis of depression in middle-aged or older Finnish men. J Affect Disord 159, 16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Randall, E, Nichaman, MZ & Contant, CF (1985) Diet diversity and nutrient intake. J Am Diet Assoc 85, 830836.Google ScholarPubMed
Krebs-Smith, SM, Smiciklas-Wright, H, Guthrie, HA et al. (1987) The effects of variety in food choices on dietary quality. J Am Diet Assoc 87, 897903.Google ScholarPubMed
Ruel, MT (2003) Operationalizing dietary diversity: a review of measurement issues and research priorities. J Nutr 133 3911S3926S.Google ScholarPubMed
Vadiveloo, M, Dixon, LB & Parekh, N (2013) Associations between dietary variety and measures of body adiposity: a systematic review of epidemiological studies. Br J Nutr 109, 15571572.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vadiveloo, M, Dixon, LB, Mijanovich, T et al. (2014) Development and evaluation of the US healthy food diversity index. Brit J Nutr 112, 15621574.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Drescher, LS, Thiele, S & Mensink, GBM (2007) A new index to measure healthy food diversity better reflects a healthy diet than traditional measures. J Nutr 137 647651.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thiele, S & Weiss, C (2003) Consumer demand for food diversity: evidence for Germany. Food Policy 28, 99115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vadiveloo, M, Parkeh, N & Mattei, J (2015) Greater healthful food variety as measured by the US healthy food diversity index is associated with lower odds of metabolic syndrome and its components in US adults. J Nutr 145(3), 564571.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vadiveloo, M, Parekh, N & Mattei, J (2015) Greater healthful food variety as measured by the US Healthy Food Diversity Index is associated with lower odds of metabolic syndrome and its components in US adults. J Nutr 145(6), 564571.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bhattacharya, J, Currie, J & Haider, S (2004) Poverty, food insecurity, and nutritional outcomes in children and adults. J Health Econ 23, 839862.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lynch, JW, Smith, GD, Kaplan, GA et al. (2000) Income inequality and mortality: importance to health of individual income, psychosocial environment, or material conditions. BMJ (Clin Res ed) 320, 12001204.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heflin, CM & Ziliak, JP (2008) Food insufficiency, food stamp participation, and mental health. Soc Sci Q 89, 706727.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heseker, H, Kubler, W, Pudel, V et al. (1992) Psychological disorders as early symptoms of a mild-to-moderate vitamin deficiency. Ann NY Acad Sci 669, 352357.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clausen, T, Charlton, KE, Gobotswang, KSM et al. (2005) Predictors of food variety and dietary diversity among older persons in Botswana. Nutrition 21, 8695.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chen, T-C, Parker, JD, Clark, J et al. (2018) National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey: Estimation Procedures, 2011–2014. Vital Health Stat 2. Hyattsville, Maryland: Department of Health and Human Services.Google Scholar
Bowman, SA, Clemens, JC, Friday, JE et al. (2017) Food patterns equivalents database 2013–14: methodology and user guide. Beltsville, MD: Food Surveys Research Group.Google Scholar
Manganello, J & Blake, N (2010) A study of quantitative content analysis of health messages in U.S. Media from 1985 to 2005. Health Commun 25, 387396.Google ScholarPubMed
Gregory, A & Coleman-Jensen, A (2017) Food insecurity, chronic disease, and health among working-age adults. Economic Res Rep No. 235. Published Online: 31 July 2017. doi: 10.22004/ag.econ.261813.Google Scholar
Gundersen, C, Kreider, B & Pepper, J (2011) The economics of food insecurity in the United States. Appl Econ Perspect Policy 33, 281303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weaver, LJ & Hadley, C (2009) Moving beyond hunger and nutrition: a systematic review of the evidence linking food insecurity and mental health in developing countries. Ecol Food Nutr 48, 263284.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hromi-Fiedler, A, Bermudez-Millan, A, Segura-Perez, S et al. (2011) Household food insecurity is associated with depressive symptoms among low-income pregnant Latinas. Matern Child Nutr 7, 421430.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention NHANES Survey Methods and Analytic Guidelines. https://wwwn.cdc.gov/nchs/nhanes/analyticguidelines.aspx (accessed January 2020).Google Scholar
Ahluwalia, N, Dwyer, J, Terry, A et al. (2016) Update on NHANES dietary data: focus on collection, release, analytical considerations, and uses to inform public policy. Adv Nutr 7, 121134.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kroenke, K, Spitzer, RL & Williams, JBW (2001) The PHQ-9 – Validity of a brief depression severity measure. J General Intern Med 16, 606613.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kroenke, K & Spitzer, RL (2002) The PHQ-9: a new depression diagnostic and severity measure. Psychiat Ann 32, 509515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montgomery, J, Lu, J, Ratliff, S et al. (2017) Food insecurity and depression among adults with diabetes: results from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). Diabetes Educator 43, 260271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bickel, G, Nord, M & Price, C et al. (2000) Guide to Measuring Household Food Security. Washington, DC: US Department of Agriculture, Food and Nutrition Service.Google Scholar
Anglin, RES, Samaan, Z, Walter, SD et al. (2013) Vitamin D deficiency and depression in adults: systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Psychiatr 202, 100117.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Spedding, S (2014) Vitamin D and depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing Studies with and without Biological Flaws. Nutrients 6, 15011518.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wahlqvist, ML (2013) Vitamin D status and food security in North-East Asia. Asia Pac J Clin Nutr 22, 15.Google ScholarPubMed
StataCorp. Stata Statistical Software. 2016. https://www.stata.com/ (accessed January 2020).Google Scholar
West, B, Berglund, P & Heeringa, S (2008) A closer examination of subpopulation analysis of complex-sample survey data. Stata J 8, 520531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rao, JNK & Scott, AJ (1984) On chi-square test for multiway contingency tables with cell proportions estimated from survey data. Ann Statistics 12, 4060.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Archer, KJ & Lemeshow, S (2006) Goodness-of-fit test for a logistic regression model fitted using survey sample data. Stata J 6, 97105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karaca-Mandic, P, Norton, EC & Dowd, B (2012) Interaction terms in nonlinear models. Health Serv Res 47, 255274.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hayes, AF (2013) Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach, 2nd ed. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Royston, P (2013) marginscontplot: Plotting the marginal effecs of continuous predictors. Stata J 13, 510527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, MS, Maddocks, E, Chen, Y et al. (2016) Food insecurity and mental illness: disproportionate impacts in the context of perceived stress and social isolation. Public Health 132, 8691.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Arenas, DJ, Thomas, A, Wang, J et al. (2019) A systematic review and meta-analysis of depression, anxiety, and sleep disorders in US adults with food insecurity. J Gen Intern Med 34, 28742882.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Garg, A, Toy, S, Tripodis, Y et al. (2015) Influence of maternal depression on household food insecurity for low-income families. Acad Pediatr 15, 305310.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hanson, KL & Olson, CM (2012) Chronic health conditions and depressive symptoms strongly predict persistent food insecurity among rural low-income families. J Health Care Poor Underserved 23, 11741188.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Huddleston-Casas, C, Charnigo, R & Simmons, LA (2009) Food insecurity and maternal depression in rural, low-income families: a longitudinal investigation. Public Health Nutr 12, 11331140.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heflin, CM, Siefert, K & Williams, DR (2005) Food insufficiency and women’s mental health: findings from a 3-year panel of welfare recipients. Soc Sci Med 61 19711982.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Siefert, K, Finlayson, TL, Williams, DR et al. (2007) Modifiable risk and protective factors for depressive symptoms in low-income African American mothers. Am J Orthopsychiatr 77 113123.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Siefert, K, Heflin, CM, Corcoran, ME et al. (2001) Food insufficiency and the physical and mental health of low-income women. Women Health 32, 159–77.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carter, KN, Krus, K, Blakely, T et al. (2011) The association of food security with psychological distress in New Zealand and any gender differences. Soc Sci Med 72, 14631471.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lassale, C, Batty, GD, Baghdadli, A et al. (2019) Healthy dietary indices and risk of depressive outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. Mol Psychiatr 24, 965986.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vadiveloo, M (2013) A Novel Scoring Method to Evaluate Associations between Dietary Variety and Body Adiposity in a National Sample of US Adults: New York University. Ann Arbor, MI: ProQuest LLC.Google Scholar
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2014) NHANES 2013–2014 Overview. https://wwwn.cdc.gov/nchs/nhanes/ContinuousNhanes/Overview.aspx?BeginYear=2013 (accessed January 2020).Google Scholar
Tarasuk, VS (2001) Household food insecurity with hunger is associated with women’s food intakes, health and household circumstances. J Nutr 131, 26702676.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Whitaker, RC, Phillips, SM & Orzol, SM (2006) Food insecurity and the risks of depression and anxiety in mothers and behavior problems in their preschool-aged children. Pediatrics 118, E859E868.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Saffel-Shrier, S, Johnson, MA & Francis, SL (2019) Position of the academy of Nutrition and Dietetics and the Society for Nutrition Education and Behavior: food and Nutrition Programs for Community-Residing Older Adults. J Nutr Educ Behav 51, 781797.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noonan, K, Corman, H & Reichman, NE (2016) Effects of maternal depression on family food insecurity. Econ Hum Biol 22, 201215.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee (2015) Scientific Report of the 2015 Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee: Advisory Report to the Secretary of Health and Human Services and the Secretary of Agriculture. Washington, DC: USDA.Google Scholar
Vandevijvere, S, De Vriese, S, Huybrechts, I et al. (2010) Overall and within-food group diversity are associated with dietary quality in Belgium. Public Health Nutr 13, 19651973.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Holick, MF, Binkley, NC, Bischoff-Ferrari, HA et al. (2011) Evaluation, treatment, and prevention of vitamin D deficiency: an Endocrine Society clinical practice guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 96, 19111930.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Figure 0

Fig. 1 Proposed association between food insecurity, diet diversity and depression. (–) Inhibiting effect; (+) reinforcing effect

Figure 1

Table 1 Describing depression, food insecurity and lack of diet diversity among low-income adults in the USA

Figure 2

Table 2 Association between food insecurity, lack of diet diversity and depression among low-income adults in the USA: odds ratios (OR) and standard errors (se)

Figure 3

Fig. 2 The moderating effect of food diversity in the association between food security and depression: plotting the predicted probabilities. 0·5; 0·6; 0·7; 0·8; 0·9; 1Source: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). NationalCenter for Health Statistics (NCHS). 2013–2014-National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey Data. Hyattsville, MD: US Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. FPED: 2013–2014 Food Patterns Equivalents Database. US Department of Agriculture. Note: This graph depicts the predicted probabilities obtained from calculating the marginal effects from Model 4. The estimate of the interaction was statistically significant P < 0·001.

Supplementary material: File

Narcisse et al. supplementary material

Narcisse et al. supplementary material 1

Download Narcisse et al. supplementary material(File)
File 16.7 KB
Supplementary material: File

Narcisse et al. supplementary material

Narcisse et al. supplementary material 2

Download Narcisse et al. supplementary material(File)
File 16.6 KB