Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-k7p5g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-10T12:23:03.360Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Epidemiologic challenges in the study of the efficacy and safety of medicinal herbs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2007

Lenore Arab*
Affiliation:
Departments of Nutrition and Epidemiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA
*
*Corresponding author: Email LenoreA@unc.edu
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Although clinical trials are needed to prove the efficacy of medicinal herbs and pharmacological studies are essential to the long-term goal of identifying the active ingredients in plants, these will not be forthcoming rapidly enough to meet the acute public health needs for knowledge on efficacy and safety since these substances are currently being widely consumed at various dosages. Resulting from the ongoing ‘natural experiment’ well-conducted observational epidemiology can bridge the gap and determine whether, as consumed its use is of benefit or detrimental, for whom and when in the course of disease prevention or minimization of disease severity. The classic study designs (cohort and case-control) and the more recent development of case-only studies can be put to service for these purposes. The challenges are in dose assessment, understanding mechanisms of effect, determining the relevant time period of exposure for a given disease or symptom, controlling for confounding factors such as disease status, and the special challenges presented by irregular use of medicinal herbs and concurrent use of multiple products and multiple sources.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © CABI Publishing 2000

References

1Mez-Mangold, L. A History of Drugs, Editiones Roche, Basel, 1971.Google Scholar
2Arab, L.Medicinal Herbs: Naturally Safe? Public Health Nutrition 2000; 3: 111.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3Stedman's medical dictionary. 23rd ednBaltimore: Williams & Wilkins; 1976.Google Scholar
4Block, G, Patterson, B, Subar, A.Fruit, vegetables, and cancer prevention. A review of the epidemiological evidence. Nutr. & Ca. 1992; 18, 129.Google Scholar
5Eisenberg, DM, Kaptchuk, TJ. The herbal history of digitalis: Lessons for alternative medicine – Reply. JAMA-Journal of the American Medical Association. 283: (7) 88588602 16 2000.Google Scholar
6Begg, CB, Zhang, ZF. Statistical analysis of molecular epidemiology studies employing case-series. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 1994; 3, 173175.Google Scholar
7Piegorsch, WW, Weinberg, CR, Taylor, JA. Non-hierarchical logistic models and case-only designs for assessing susceptibility in population-based case-control studies. Stat. Med. 1994; 13, 153162.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed