Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Development of a diet quality index assessing adherence to the Swedish nutrition recommendations and dietary guidelines in the Malmö Diet and Cancer cohort

  • Isabel Drake (a1), Bo Gullberg (a1), Ulrika Ericson (a1), Emily Sonestedt (a1), Jan Nilsson (a1), Peter Wallström (a1), Bo Hedblad (a1) and Elisabet Wirfält (a1)...

Abstract

Objective

To develop a diet quality index (DQI) that assesses adherence to the Swedish nutrition recommendations (SNR) and the Swedish dietary guidelines (SDG).

Design

A cross-sectional study within the Malmö Diet and Cancer (MDC) cohort. A diet history method collected dietary data, a structured questionnaire lifestyle and socio-economic information, and anthropometric data were collected by direct measurements. The index (DQI-SNR) included six components: SFA, PUFA, fish and shellfish, dietary fibre, fruit and vegetables, and sucrose.

Setting

Malmö, Sweden.

Subjects

Men (n 4525) and women (n 8491) of the MDC cohort enrolled from September 1994 to October 1996.

Results

For participants with high DQI-SNR scores, nutrient and food intakes were close to recommendations. However, most of the study population exceeded the recommended intake for SFA (98 %) and few reached recommended intakes for dietary fibre (24 %), fruit and vegetables (32 %), vitamin D (18 %) and folate (2 %). A high DQI-SNR score was positively associated with age, physical activity, not smoking, past food habit change, education and socio-economic status. Individuals with high scores were more likely to have a diabetes diagnosis or experienced a cardiovascular event.

Conclusions

Results suggest that the DQI-SNR is a useful tool for assessing adherence to the SNR 2005 and the SDG in the MDC cohort. No index has previously been developed with the aim of evaluating adherence to the current dietary recommendations in Sweden. Further validation of the DQI-SNR, and evaluation of its utility, is needed.

    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Development of a diet quality index assessing adherence to the Swedish nutrition recommendations and dietary guidelines in the Malmö Diet and Cancer cohort
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Development of a diet quality index assessing adherence to the Swedish nutrition recommendations and dietary guidelines in the Malmö Diet and Cancer cohort
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Development of a diet quality index assessing adherence to the Swedish nutrition recommendations and dietary guidelines in the Malmö Diet and Cancer cohort
      Available formats
      ×

Copyright

Corresponding author

*Corresponding author: Email isabel.drake@med.lu.se

References

Hide All
1.Jacobs, D & Tapsell, L (2007) Food, not nutrients, is the fundamental unit in nutrition. Nutr Rev 65, 439450.
2.Tucker, K (2001) Eat a variety of healthful foods: old advice with new support. Nutr Rev 59, 156158.
3.Hoffman, K, Schulze, M & Boeing, H (2002) Dietary patterns: report of an international workshop. Public Health Nutr 5, 8990.
4.Hu, F (2002) Dietary pattern analysis: a new direction in nutritional epidemiology. Curr Opin Lipidol 13, 39.
5.Moeller, S, Reedy, J, Millen, AE et al. (2007) Dietary patterns: challenges and opportunities in dietary pattern research an Experimental Biology workshop April 1, 2006. J Am Diet Assoc 107, 12331239.
6.Jacobs, DR Jr, Gross, M & Tapsell, L (2009) Food synergy: an operational concept for understanding nutrition. Am J Clin Nutr 89, 1543S1548S.
7.Michels, K & Schulze, M (2005) Can dietary patterns help us detect diet–disease associations? Nutr Res Rev 18, 241248.
8.Newby, P & Tucker, K (2004) Empirically derived eating patterns using factor or cluster analysis: a review. Nutr Rev 62, 177203.
9.Kant, A (2004) Dietary patterns and health outcomes. J Am Diet Assoc 104, 615635.
10.Waijers, P, Feskens, E & Ocké, M (2007) A critical review of predefined diet quality scores. Br J Nutr 97, 219231.
11.Arvaniti, F & Panagiotakos, D (2008) Healthy indexes in public health practice and research: a review. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 48, 317327.
12.Wirt, A & Collins, C (2009) Diet quality – what is it and does it matter? Public Health Nutr 12, 24732492.
13.Kant, A (1996) Indexes of overall diet quality: a review. J Am Diet Assoc 96, 785791.
14.Kourlaba, G & Panagiotakos, D (2009) Dietary quality indices and human health: a review. Maturitas 62, 18.
15.Kim, S, Haines, P, Siega-Riz, A et al. (2003) The Diet Quality Index-International (DQI-I) provides an effective tool for cross-national comparison of diet quality as illustrated by China and the United States. J Nutr 133, 34763484.
16.Weinstein, S, Vogt, T & Gerrior, S (2004) Healthy Eating Index scores are associated with blood nutrient concentrations in the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. J Am Diet Assoc 104, 576584.
17.Hann, C, Rock, C, King, I et al. (2001) Validation of the Healthy Eating Index with use of plasma biomarkers in a clinical sample of women. Am J Clin Nutr 74, 479486.
18.Neuhouser, M, Patterson, R, King, I et al. (2003) Selected nutritional biomarkers predict diet quality. Public Health Nutr 6, 703709.
19.Kant, A & Graubard, B (2005) A comparison of three dietary pattern indexes for predicting biomarkers of diet and disease. J Am Coll Nutr 24, 294303.
20.Fung, T, Hu, F, Barbieri, R et al. (2007) Dietary patterns, the Alternate Healthy Eating Index and plasma sex hormone concentrations in postmenopausal women. Int J Cancer 121, 803809.
21.Boynton, A, Neuhouser, M, Wener, M et al. (2007) Associations between healthy eating patterns and immune function or inflammation in overweight or obese postmenopausal women. Am J Clin Nutr 86, 14451455.
22.Huijbregts, P, Feskens, E, Räsänen, L et al. (1997) Dietary pattern and 20 year mortality in elderly men in Finland, Italy, and the Netherlands: longitudinal cohort study. BMJ 315, 1317.
23.Seymour, J, Calle, E, Flagg, E et al. (2003) Diet Quality Index as a predictor of short-term mortality in the American Cancer Society Cancer Prevention Study II Nutrition Cohort. Am J Epidemiol 157, 980988.
24.Osler, M, Heitmann, B, Gerdes, L et al. (2001) Dietary patterns and mortality in Danish men and women: a prospective observational study. Br J Nutr 85, 219225.
25.Knoops, K, Groot de, L, Fidanza, F et al. (2006) Comparison of three different dietary scores in relation to 10-year mortality in elderly European subjects: the HALE project. Eur J Clin Nutr 60, 746755.
26.Kant, A, Schatzkin, A, Graubard, B et al. (2000) A prospective study of diet quality and mortality in women. JAMA 283, 21092115.
27.McCullough, M, Feskanich, D, Stampfer, M et al. (2002) Diet quality and major chronic disease risk in men and women: moving toward improved dietary guidance. Am J Clin Nutr 76, 12611271.
28.Alberti, A, Fruttini, D & Fidanza, F (2009) The Mediterranean Adequacy Index: further confirming results of validity. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis 19, 6166.
29.Fung, T, Hu, F, McCullough, M et al. (2006) Diet quality is associated with the risk of estrogen receptor-negative breast cancer in postmenopausal women. J Nutr 136, 466472.
30.Reedy, J, Mitrou, P, Krebs-Smith, S et al. (2008) Index-based dietary patterns and risk of colorectal cancer. Am J Epidemiol 168, 3848.
31.Swedish National Food Administration (2005) Swedish Nutrition Recommendations 2005. Uppsala: National Food Administration.
32.Swedish National Food Administration (2010) Kostråd för vuxna (Dietary guidelines for adults). http://www.slv.se/sv/gruppa1/mat-och-naring/kostrad/vuxna (accessed February 2010).
33.Nordic Council of Ministers (2004) Nordic Nutrition Recommendations 2004 – Integrating Nutrition and Physical Activity, 4th ed. Copenhagen: Nordic Council of Ministers.
34.Enghardt-Barbieri, H & Lindvall, C (2003) Swedish Nutrition Recommendations Objectified (SNO) – Basis for General Advice on Food Consumption for Healthy Adults. Uppsala: Swedish National Food Administration.
35.Becker, W & Pearson, M (2003) Riksmaten 1997–98. Dietary Habits and Nutrient Intake in Sweden 1997–98. The Second National Food Consumption Survey. Uppsala: Swedish National Food Administration.
36.Becker, W (1998) Dietary guidelines and patterns of food and nutrient intake in Sweden. Br J Nutr 81, Suppl. 2, S113S117.
37.Berglund, G, Elmståhl, S, Janzon, L et al. (1993) The Malmö Diet and Cancer study. Design and feasibility. J Intern Med 233, 4551.
38.Manjer, J, Carlsson, S, Elmstahl, S et al. (2001) The Malmö Diet and Cancer Study: representativity, cancer incidence and mortality in participants and non-participants. Eur J Cancer Prev 10, 489499.
39.Wirfält, E, Mattisson, I, Johansson, U et al. (2002) A methodological report from the Malmö Diet and Cancer Study: development and evaluation of altered routines in dietary data processing. Nutr J 1, 3.
40.Callmer, E, Riboli, E, Saracci, R et al. (1993) Dietary assessment methods evaluated in the Malmö food study. J Intern Med 233, 5357.
41.Elmståhl, S, Riboli, E, Lindegärde, F et al. (1996) The Malmö food study: the relative validity of a modified diet history method and an extensive food frequency questionnaire for measuring food intake. Eur J Clin Nutr 50, 143151.
42.Riboli, E, Elmståhl, S, Saracci, R et al. (1997) The Malmö food study: validity of two dietary assessment methods for measuring nutrient intake. Int J Epidemiol 26, Suppl. 1, S161S173.
43.Elmståhl, S, Gullberg, B, Riboli, E et al. (1996) The Malmö food study: the reproducibility of a novel diet history method and an extensive food frequency questionnaire. Eur J Clin Nutr 50, 134142.
44.Thiébaut, ACM, Kipnis, V, Schatzkin, A et al. (2008) The role of dietary measurement error in investigating the hypothesized link between dietary fat intake and breast cancer – a story with twists and turns. Cancer Invest 26, 6873.
45.Willett, WC (1998) Nutrition Epidemiology, 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press.
46.Taylor, H, Jacobs, D, Schucker, B et al. (1978) A questionnaire for the assessment of leisure time physical activities. J Chronic Dis 31, 741755.
47.Richardson, M, Leon, A, Jacobs, D et al. (1994) Comprehensive evaluation of the Minnesota Leisure Time Physical Activity Questionnaire. J Clin Epidemiol 47, 271281.
48.Li, C, Aronsson, C, Hedblad, B et al. (2009) Ability of physical activity measurements to assess health-related risks. Eur J Clin Nutr 63, 14481451.
49.Mattisson, I, Wirfält, E, Aronsson, C et al. (2005) Misreporting of energy: prevalence, characteristics of misreporters and influence on observed risk estimates in the Malmö Diet and Cancer cohort. Br J Nutr 94, 832842.
50.Goldberg, G, Black, A, Jebb, S et al. (1991) Critical evaluation of energy intake using fundamental principles of energy physiology: 1. Derivation of cut-off limits to identify under-reporting. Eur J Clin Nutr 45, 569581.
51.Black, A (2000) Critical evaluation of energy intake using the Goldberg cut-off for energy intake:basal metabolic rate. A practical guide to its calculation, use and limitations. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 24, 11191130.
52.Jakobsen, M, Eilis, J, Heitmann, B et al. (2009) Major types of dietary fat and risk of coronary heart disease: a pooled analysis of 11 cohort studies. Am J Clin Nutr 89, 14251432.
53.Willett, W, Howe, G & Kushi, L (1997) Adjustment for total energy intake in epidemiologic studies. Am J Clin Nutr 65, Suppl. 4, 1220S1228S.
54.Trochim, W (2004) Research Methods Knowledge Base: Measurement Validity Types. http://www.socialresearchmethods.net/kb/measval.htm (accessed February 2010).
55.Sonestedt, E, Wirfält, E, Gullberg, G et al. (2005) Past food habit change is related to obesity, lifestyle and socio-economic factors in the Malmo Diet and Cancer Cohort. Public Health Nutr 8, 876885.
56.Kennedy, E, Ohls, J, Carlson, S et al. (1995) The Healthy Eating Index: design and applications. J Am Diet Assoc 95, 11031108.
57.Patterson, R, Haines, P & Popkin, B (1994) Diet quality index: capturing a multidimensional behavior. J Am Diet Assoc 94, 5764.
58.Haines, P, Siega-Riz, A & Popkin, B (1999) The Diet Quality Index Revised: a measurement instrument for populations. J Am Diet Assoc 99, 697704.
59.Kushi, L, Sellers, T, Potter, J et al. (1992) Dietary fat and postmenopausal breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 84, 10921099.
60.Mattisson, I, Wirfält, E, Gullberg, B et al. (2001) Fat intake is more strongly associated with socio-economic characteristics, regardless of energy adjustment approach. Eur J Clin Nutr 55, 452461.
61.Lauza, J, Håkansson, N, Brozozowska, A et al. (2009) Diet quality and mortality: a population-based prospective study of men. Eur J Clin Nutr 63, 415417.

Keywords

Development of a diet quality index assessing adherence to the Swedish nutrition recommendations and dietary guidelines in the Malmö Diet and Cancer cohort

  • Isabel Drake (a1), Bo Gullberg (a1), Ulrika Ericson (a1), Emily Sonestedt (a1), Jan Nilsson (a1), Peter Wallström (a1), Bo Hedblad (a1) and Elisabet Wirfält (a1)...

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.