Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-68ccn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-10T12:03:46.247Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Dealing with scientific fraud: a proposal

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2007

Seth Roberts
Affiliation:
Department of PsychologyUniversity of CaliforniaBerkeley CA 94720, USA Email: twoutopias@gmail.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Debate
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2006

References

1O'Neill-Yates, C. The secret life of Dr. Chandra. The National (Canada) [three features], 31 January–2 02 2006. Available at http://www.cbc.ca/national/news/chandraGoogle Scholar
2Chandra, R. Effect of vitamin and trace-element supplementation on cognitive function in elderly subjects. Nutrition 2001; 17: 709–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3Shenkin, S, Whiteman, C, Pattie, A, Deary, I. Supplementation and the elderly: dramatic results? Nutrition 2002; 18: 364.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4Chandra, RResponse to comments of Shenkin et al. Nutrition 2002; 18: 364–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5Brody, J. Nutrition a key to better health for the elderly. New York Times, 21 08 2001. Available at www.nytimes.comGoogle Scholar
6Roberts, S, Sternberg, S. Do nutritional supplements improve cognitive function in the elderly? Nutrition 2003; 19: 978–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7Chandra, R. Can nutritional supplements improve functional outcome in the elderly? Nutrition 2003; 19: 978–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8Chandra, R. Effect of vitamin and trace-element supplements on immune responses and infection in elderly subjects. Lancet 1992; 340: 1124–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9Carpenter, K, Roberts, S, Sternberg, S. Nutrition and immune function: a 1992 report. Lancet 2003; 361: 2247.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10Chandra, RResponse to comments of Carpenter et al. Lancet 2003; 361: 2247–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11White, C. Three journals raise doubts on validity of Canadian studies. British Medical Journal 2004; 328: 67. Available at www.bmj.comCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12Chandra, R. Validity of Canadian studies: author's response. British Medical Journal 2004; 328: 465. Available at www.bmj.comCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13Mahoney, J. Leading vitamin scientist faces fire over data. Globe and Mail, 11 12 2003.Google Scholar
14Brody, J. A top scientist's research is under attack. New York Times, 6 05 2004. Available at www.nytimes.comGoogle Scholar
15Walsh, N. Questions continue over research claims. CBC News, 10 06 2004. Available at http://www.cbc.ca/nl/story/nf_chandra_20040610.htmlGoogle Scholar
16Walsh, N. Chandra documentary. The Current (Canada), 10 06 2004. Available at http://www.cbc.ca/thecurrent/2004/200406/20040610.htmlGoogle Scholar
17Meguid, M. Retraction. Nutrition 2005; 21: 286.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18Memorial University of Newfoundland. Statement from Memorial University of Newfoundland re: Dr. Ranjit Chandra and research integrity, 3 02 2006. Available at www.mun.caGoogle Scholar
19Meguid, M, Shenkin, A. Introduction: nutritional supplements and the quest to improve human performance – the need for the strictest standards and rigor when reporting clinical trials, Nutrition 2003; 19: 955–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
20Suroweicki, J. The Wisdom of Crowds. New York: Random House, 2004.Google Scholar