Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Concurrent and construct validity of Mediterranean diet scores as assessed by an FFQ

  • Alejandra A Benítez-Arciniega (a1) (a2) (a3), Michelle A Mendez (a4) (a5), Jose M Baena-Díez (a6), Maria-Asunción Rovira Martori (a1) (a3), Cristina Soler (a7), Jaume Marrugat (a3) (a5) (a7), Maria-Isabel Covas (a1) (a2) (a3), Hector Sanz (a7), Alba Llopis (a1) and Helmut Schröder (a1) (a2) (a3)...

Abstract

Objective

The aim of the present study was to assess the concurrent and construct validity of two diet-quality indices, a modified Mediterranean diet score (mMDS) and a Mediterranean-like diet score (MLDS) additionally incorporating unhealthy food choices, as determined by an FFQ.

Design

A validation study assessing FFQ intake estimates compared with ten or more unannounced 24 h recalls. Pearson's correlation coefficients, intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), Bland–Altman plots and the limits of agreement method were used to assess the between-method agreement of scores. Construct validity was shown using associations between nutrient intakes derived from multiple 24 h recalls and the mMDS and MLDS derived from the FFQ.

Setting

Gerona, Spain.

Subjects

A total of 107 consecutively selected participants from a population-based cross-sectional survey.

Results

Pearson's correlations for the energy-adjusted mMDS and MLDS compared with multiple recalls were 0·48 and 0·62, respectively. The average FFQ energy-adjusted mMDS and MLDS were 102 % and 98 % of the recall-based mMDS and MLDS estimates, respectively. The FFQ under- and overestimated dietary recall estimates of the energy-adjusted MLDS by 28 % and 25 %, respectively, with slightly wider boundaries for the mMDS (31 % and 34 %). The ICC, which assesses absolute agreement, was similar to Pearson's correlations (mMDS = 0·48 and MLDS = 0·61). The mean differences between methods were similar across the range of average ratings for both scores, indicating the absence of bias. The FFQ-derived mMDS and MLDS correlated in the anticipated directions with intakes of eleven (73·3 %) and thirteen of fifteen nutrients (86·7 %), respectively.

Conclusions

The FFQ provides valid estimates of diet quality as assessed by the mMDS and MLDS.

    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Concurrent and construct validity of Mediterranean diet scores as assessed by an FFQ
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Concurrent and construct validity of Mediterranean diet scores as assessed by an FFQ
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Concurrent and construct validity of Mediterranean diet scores as assessed by an FFQ
      Available formats
      ×

Copyright

Corresponding author

*Corresponding author: Email hschroeder@imim.es

Footnotes

Hide All

A full roster of REGICOR investigators and collaborators can be found at www.REGICOR.org/regicor.inv

Footnotes

References

Hide All
1.Kant, AK (2004) Dietary patterns and health outcomes. J Am Diet Assoc 104, 615635.
2.Waijers, PM, Feskens, EJM & Ocké, C (2007) A critical review of predefined diet quality scores. Br J Nutr 97, 219231.
3.Arvaniti, F & Panagiotakos, DB (2008) Healthy indexes in public health practice and research: a review. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 48, 317327.
4.Bach, A, Serra-Majem, L, Carrasco, JL et al. (2006) The use of indexes evaluating the adherence to the Mediterranean diet in epidemiological studies: a review. Public Health Nutr 9, 132146.
5.Trichopoulou, A, Costacou, T, Bamia, C et al. (2003) Adherence to a Mediterranean diet and survival in a Greek population. N Engl J Med 348, 25992608.
6.Trichopoulou, A, Kouris-Blazos, A, Wahlqvist, ML et al. (1995) Diet and overall survival in elderly people. BMJ 311, 14571460.
7.Martinez-Gonzalez, MA, Bes-Rastrollo, M, Serra-Majem, L et al. (2009) Mediterranean food pattern and the primary prevention of chronic disease: recent developments. Nutr Rev 67, Suppl. 1, S111S116.
8.Muñoz, MA, Fíto, M, Marrugat, J et al. (2009) Adherence to the Mediterranean diet is associated with better mental and physical health. Br J Nutr 101, 18211827.
9.Schroder, H (2007) Protective mechanisms of the Mediterranean diet in obesity and type 2 diabetes. J Nutr Biochem 18, 149160.
10.Molag, ML, de Vries, JH, Ocké, MC et al. (2007) Design characteristics of food frequency questionnaires in relation to their validity. Am J Epidemiol 166, 14681478.
11.Kristal, AR & Potter, JD (2006) Not the time to abandon the food frequency questionnaire: counterpoint. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 15, 17591760.
12.Freedman, LS, Potischman, N, Kipnis, V et al. (2006) A comparison of two dietary instruments for evaluating the fat–breast cancer relationship. Int J Epidemiol 35, 10111021.
13.Grau, M, Subirana, I, Elosua, R et al. (2007) Trends in cardiovascular risk factor prevalence (1995–2000–2005) in northeastern Spain. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil 14, 653659.
14.Schröder, H, Covas, MI, Marrugat, J et al. (2002) Use of a three-day estimated food record, a 72-hour recall and a food-frequency questionnaire for dietary assessment in a Mediterranean Spanish population. Clin Nutr 20, 429437.
15.Trichopoulou, A, Orfanos, P, Norat, T et al. (2005) Modified Mediterranean diet and survival: EPIC-elderly prospective cohort study. BMJ 330, 991.
16.Schröder, H, Marrugat, J, Vila, J et al. (2004) Adherence to the traditional Mediterranean diet is inversely associated with body mass index and obesity in a Spanish population. J Nutr 134, 33553361.
17.Bland, JM & Altman, DG (1986) Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1, 307310.
18.Ambrosini, GL, van Roosbroeck, SA, Mackerras, D et al. (2003) The reliability of ten-year dietary recall: implications for cancer research. J Nutr 133, 26632668.
19.Scarmeas, N, Stern, Y, Tang, MX et al. (2006) Mediterranean diet and risk of Alzheimer's disease. Ann Neurol 59, 912921.
20.Buckland, G, González, CA, Agudo, A et al. (2009) Adherence to the Mediterranean diet and risk of coronary heart disease in the Spanish EPIC cohort study. Am J Epidemiol 170, 15181529.
21.Benetou, V, Trichopoulou, A, Orfanos, P et al. (2008) Conformity to traditional Mediterranean diet and cancer incidence: the Greek EPIC cohort. Br J Cancer 99, 191195.
22.Newby, PK, Hu, FB, Rimm, EB et al. (2003) Reproducibility and validity of the Diet Quality Index Revised as assessed by use of a food-frequency questionnaire. Am J Clin Nutr 78, 941949.
23.Hu, FB, Rimm, E, Smith-Warner, SA et al. (1999) Reproducibility and validity of dietary patterns assessed with a food-frequency questionnaire. Am J Clin Nutr 69, 243249.
24.Keogh, JB, Lange, K & Syrette, J (2010) Comparative analysis of two FFQ. Public Health Nutr 13, 15531558.

Keywords

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed