Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-nmvwc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-17T14:43:16.831Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Lower and Middle Palaeolithic Industries of the English East Midlands1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 May 2014

Merrick Posnansky
Affiliation:
British Institute of History and Archaeology in East Africa, Kampala, Uganda

Extract

The first palaeoliths to be described from this country were found in the south of England, particularly from the Thames Valley and East Anglia. In 1880 Boyd Dawkins wrote that tools of Drift Man were ‘conspicuous by their absence from the gravels north-west of a line passing through the Midland counties from Bristol to the Wash’. In 1897 John Evans (Evans 1897, 580), in the light of the Saltley find from the Birmingham district, questioned the view then current that their absence was due to glacial conditions prevailing north of the Severn—Wash ‘imaginary’ line, and held out hope for future finds in that northern area.

Though hand axes had earlier been described from Chester (Stone 1908, 25) and Bridlington (Evans 1897, 572) it was not until the 1920's that Sir John Evans's hopes began to be realized. Randall Davies brought attention to a hand axe found in railway ballast gravel from Skellingthorpe in Lincolnshire in 1920.

In the West Midlands numerous isolated finds were described from 1920 onwards by Burkitt (1920), Jack, Smith, Shotton and Clifford, the last two authors having in recent years (Shotton 1934 and 1953, Clifford 1954) provided a fairly comprehensive account and bibliography of the Lower and Middle palaeolithic finds from the West Midlands. In the East Midlands the story of discovery has been slower and very little of the material found has been published. In 1922 R. A. Smith published two flake implements from Leicestershire, though these cannot now be accepted (Posnansky 1955, 31).

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Prehistoric Society 1963

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Alimen, H. and Vignal, A., 1952. ‘Étude Statistique de bifaces Acheuléens—Essai d'Archéometrie’, Bull. Soc Préh. Fr., 5672.Google Scholar
Arkell, W. J. and Oakley, K. P., 1948. In ‘On the Ancient Channel between Caversham and Henley, Oxfordshire, and its contained Flint Implements. Part II’, PPS, XIV, 134–54.Google Scholar
Armstrong, A. L., 1942. ‘Palaeolithic Man in the North Midlands’, J. Derby. Arch. and Nat. Hist. Soc., LXIII, 2860.Google Scholar
Baden-Powell, D. F. W., 1950. ‘Palaeoliths from the Fen District’, PPS, XVI.Google Scholar
Baker, F. T., 1954. The Prehistoric Settlement of Lincolnshire, M.A. Thesis, Univ. Nott.Google Scholar
Bemrose, Arnold H. H. and Deeley, R. M., 1896. ‘Discovery of Mammalian Remains in the Old River Gravels of the Derwent near Derby’, AJGS, LII, 497510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Breuil, H. and Koslowski, L., 19311933. ‘Eludes de Stratigraphie Paléolithique dans le Nord de la France, la Belgique et l'Angleterre’, L'Anthropologie, XLI–XLIII.Google Scholar
Breuil, H., 1937. ‘Terrasses et quartzites taillés de la haute vallée de la Garonne’, Bull. Soc. Préh. Fr. XXXIV.Google Scholar
Bordes, F. and Fitte, P., 1953. ‘L'Atelier Commont’, L'Anthropologie, LVII, 145.Google Scholar
Burchell, J. P. T., 1931. ‘On the Kirmington Clactonian’, Proc. Preh. Soc. East Anglia, VI, 262–5.Google Scholar
Burchell, J. P. T., 1931. ‘Palaeolithic Implements from Kirmington and their relation to the 100-foot raised beach of Late Pleistocene times’, Ant. J., XI, 262–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burchell, J. P. T., 1935. ‘Some Pleistocene Deposits at Kirmington and Crayford’, Geol. Mag., LXXII, 327–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clifford, E. M., 1943. ‘Palaeolithic Implements from Little Alne, Alcester, Warwickshire’, PPS, IX, 52.Google Scholar
Clifford, E. M., Garrod, D. A. E. and Gracie, H. S., 1954. ‘Flint Implements from Gloucestershire’, Ant. J., XXXIV, 178–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cockerton, R. W. P., 1954. ‘A Palaeolith from Hopton’, J. Derby. Arch. and Nat. Hist. Soc., XXIV, 153–5.Google Scholar
Collins, E. R., 1922. ‘Discovery of an Early Palaeolithic Implement in Yorkshire’, Proc. Preh. Soc. East Anglia, III, 603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, E. R., 1932. ‘The Palaeolithic Implements of Nidderdale, Yorkshire’, Proc. Preh. Soc. East Anglia, VI, 156–73.Google Scholar
Collins, E. R., 1952. ‘Lower Palaeolithic in the Midlands and the North of England’. Text of a lecture given to the Yorks. Arch. Soc., 1952.Google Scholar
Cooke, H. S. B., 1956. ‘The Terraces and Palaeolithic Implements of the Vaal River’. Lecture given to the Prehistoric Society, April 1956.Google Scholar
Dawkins, W. Boyd, 1880. Early Man in Britain. London.Google Scholar
Edgar, W., 1931. Northants Nat. Hist. Soc. and Field Club, XXVI.Google Scholar
Evans, J., 1897. Ancient Stone Implements, 2nd ed. London.Google Scholar
Goode, W. W., 1932. ‘Note on the finding of a Palaeolithic Implement at Leicester,’ Ant. J., XII, 306–7.Google Scholar
Goury, G., 1948. Origine et Evolution de l'Homme, 2nd ed. Paris.Google Scholar
Hawkes, C. F. C., Oakley, K. P. and Warren, S. H.The Industries of the Barnfield Pit’, JRAI, LXVIII, 3047.Google Scholar
Hollingworth, S. E. and Taylor, J. H., 1946. ‘An Outline of the Geoiogy of the Kettering District’, PGA, LVII, 229–45.Google Scholar
Hill, W., 1911. ‘Flint and Chert’, PGA, XXII, 6194.Google Scholar
King, W. B. R., 1955. ‘The Pleistocene Epoch in England’, QJGS, CXI, 187208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lacaille, A. D., 1940. ‘The Palaeoliths from the Gravels of the Lower Boyn Hill Terrace around Maidenhead’, Ant. J., XX, 256 ff.Google Scholar
Lacaille, A. D., 1944. ‘Palaeolithic Implements Manufactured in Naturally Holed Flints from Rossington, Yorks. and Dartford, Kent’, Ant. J., XXIV, 144–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lacaille, A. D., 1946. ‘A Flint Ovate from Risby Warren’, Ant. J., XXVI, 180–1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lacaille, A. D., 1954A. The Stone Age in Scotland, LondonGoogle Scholar
Lacaille, A. D., 1954B. ‘Palaeoliths from the Lower reaches of the Bristol Avon’, Ant. J., XXXIV, 127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lacaille, A. D., 1954C. ‘A Handaxe from Pen-y-lan, Cardiff’, Ant. J., XXXIV, 64–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lalanne, J. C. and Bouyssonie, J., 1946. ‘Le Gisement Paléolithique de Laussel’, L'Anthropologie, L, 1 ff.Google Scholar
McBurney, C. B. M., 1950. ‘The Geographical Study of the Older Palaeolithic Stages in Europe’, PPS, XIV, 163–84.Google Scholar
McBurney, C. B. M., 1954. ‘The Quaternary Deposits at Hoxne, Suffolk and their Archaeology. Part II’, PPS, XX, 139–55.Google Scholar
Oakley, K. P. and Leakey, M. D., 1937. ‘Report on Excavations at Jaywick Sands, Essex (1934), with some observations on the Clactonian industry and on the Fauna and Geological significance of the Clacton Channel’, PPS, III, 217–61.Google Scholar
Oakley, K. P. and Leakey, M. D., 1952. ‘Swanscombe Man’, PGA, LXIII, 271300.Google Scholar
Obermaier, H., 1912. Der Mensch der Vorzeit. Munich.Google Scholar
Paterson, T. T. and Fagg, B. E. B., 1940. ‘Studies on the Palaeolithic Succession in England. No. II. The Upper Brecklandian Acheul (Elveden)’, PPS, VI, 130.Google Scholar
Posnansky, M., 1955. ‘A Palaeolithic Implement from near Shipley Hill, Ratcliffe-on-the-Wreak’, Trans. Leic. Arch. & Hist. Soc., XXXI, 30–4.Google Scholar
Posnansky, M., 1958. ‘A Levalloisian Implement from Lake Welbeck, Nottinghamshire’, Ant. J., XXXVIII.Google Scholar
Posnansky, M., 1959. ‘Some Functional Considerations on the Handaxe’, Man, 1959, no. 61.Google Scholar
Posnansky, M., 1960. ‘The Pleistocene Succession in the Middle Trent Basin’, PGA, LXXI, 285311.Google Scholar
Raistrick, A., 1934. ‘The Correlation of Glacial Retreat Stages across the Pennines’, Proc. Yorks. Geol. Soc., XXII, 3.Google Scholar
Shotton, F. W., 1934. ‘Stone Implements of Warwickshire’, Trans. Birm. Arch. Soc., LVIII, 3753.Google Scholar
Shotton, F. W., 1953. ‘The Pleistocene Deposits of the area between Coventry, Rugby and Leamington and their bearing upon the Topographical Development of the Midlands’, Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. B. 237, 209–60.Google Scholar
Smith, R. A., 1922. ‘Flint Implements of Special Interest’, Archaeologia, LXXII, 25 ff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, R. A., 1928. ‘Palaeoliths near Nottingham’, Ant. J., VIII, 91–3.Google Scholar
Stone, W., 1908. Prehistoric Man in Cheshire.Google Scholar
Swinnerton, H. H., 1934. Early Man in the East Midlands. Abbott Memorial Lecture, Univ. College, Nottingham.Google Scholar
Swinnerton, H. H., 1937. ‘The Problem of the Lincoln Gap’, Trans. Lincs. Nats. Union.Google Scholar
Tester, P. J., 1952. ‘Early Use of the Levallois Technique in the Palaeolithic Succession of the Lower Thames’, Arch. Newsletter, IV, 118–19.Google Scholar
Treacher, M. S., Arkell, W. J. and Oakley, K. P., 1948. ‘On the Ancient Channel between Caversham and Henley, Oxfordshire, and its contained Flint Implements’, PPS, 126–54.Google Scholar
Trechmann, C. T., 1928. ‘A Supposed Implement of Quartzite from beneath the Boulder Clay of the Durham Coast’, Geol. Mag., LXV, 25–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waters, A. H. S., 19481952. Reports of the Advisory Committee on Sand and Gravel. London, at His Majesty's Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Warren, S. H., 1914. ‘The Experimental Investigation of Flint Fracture and its Application to Problems of Human Implements’, JRAI, XLIV, 412–50.Google Scholar
Warren, S. H., 1922. ‘The Mesvinian Industry of Clacton-on-Sea, Essex’, Proc. Preh. Soc. East Anglia, III, 116.Google Scholar
Warren, S. H., 1932. ‘The Palaeolithic Industry of Clacton-on-Sea, Essex’, Proc. First Int. Congr. Prehist. and Protohist. Sci., 6970.Google Scholar
Warren, S. H., 1951. ‘The Clacton Flint Industry: a New Interpretation’, PGA, LXII, 107 ff.Google Scholar
Zeuner, F., 1945. The Pleistocene Period. London, Ray Society.Google Scholar