Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-25wd4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T13:26:51.562Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Geological Age of the Cromer Forest Bed

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 May 2014

Augusto Azzaroli
Augusto Azzaroli
Affiliation:
Institute of Geology, University of Florence
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The present writer has had recently the opportunity to carry out a revision of the deer of the Cromer Forest Bed series of East Anglia. The entire work is to be published in the Bulletin of the British Museum (Natural History). The stratigraphical conclusions will be summarized here.

The occurrence of relatively archaic species together with more modern species in the Forest Bed fauna has puzzled many palaeontologists. Whereas the older authors concluded that it was wholly Pliocene (Reid, 1890, with bibliography) or partially or totally derived (Dubois, 1905), more recently a tendency has become prevalent to attribute the whole fauna to the early Pleistocene, and to explain the more archaic species as relics (Osborn, 1922; Zeuner, 1945). It may be shown that all these interpretations are untenable.

A Pliocene age is ruled out by the presence of species which immigrated into Europe after the close of the Villafranchian. On the other hand, the older representatives, once attributed to the Pliocene but actually of Upper Villafranchian age, do not constitute isolated relics: an entire faunal assemblage characteristic of that epoch is present. Moreover, primitive species occur in the Forest Bed fauna together with their more advanced descendants, and the fauna is richer in species than in any other locality.

Type
Research Article
Information
Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society , Volume 17 , Issue 2 , 1951 , pp. 168 - 170
Copyright
Copyright © The Prehistoric Society 1951

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Boswell, P. G. H. 1931. The Stratigraphy of the Glacial Deposits of East Anglia in relation to Early Man. Proc. Geol. Assoc. 42, p. 87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dubois, E. 1905. L' âge des différentes assises englobées dans la serie du Forest Bed ou Cromérien. Bull. Soc. Beige Géol., Proc. Verb., 19, p. 263.Google Scholar
Hinton, M. 1926a. Monograph of the Voles and Lemmings (Microtinae) living and extinct. British Museum {Natural History). London.Google Scholar
Hinton, M. 1926b. The Pleistocene Mammalia of the British Isles and their bearing upon the date of the glacial Period. Proc. Yorks. Geol. Soc., N.S. 20, pt. 3, p. 325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osborn, H. F. 1922. Pliocene and early Pleistocene Mammalia of East Anglia, Great Britain, in relation to the appearance of Man. Geol. Mag., 59, p. 433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reid, C. 1890. The Pliocene deposits of Britain. Mem. Geol. Surv., 1890.Google Scholar
Soergel, W. 1928. Das geologische Alter des Homo heidelbergensis. Palaeontologische Zschr., 10, p. 217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solomon, J. D. 1932. The glacial succession of the North Norfolk coast. Proc. Geol. Assoc., 43, p. 241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woldstedt, P. 1950 Norddeutschland und angrenzende Gebiete im Eiszeitalter. Ed. Kochler, , Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Zeuner, F. 1945. The Pleistocene Period. Ray Society, London.Google Scholar