Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Late Bronze Age Pottery Production: Evidence from a 12th–11th century cal bc Settlement at Tinney's Lane, Sherborne, Dorset

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 March 2013

Joanne Best
Affiliation:
Exeter Archaeology, Custom House, The Quay, Exeter, Devon EX2 4AN
Ann Woodward
Affiliation:
Ann Woodward, 17 Great Western Road, Dorchester, Dorset DT1 1UF

Abstract

Excavations at Tinney's Lane, Sherborne in 2002 uncovered extensive evidence for Late Bronze Age settlement and pottery production, dating from a short time period probably within the 12th or 11th century cal bc. Well-preserved deposits of burnt stone, broken vessels, and burnt sherds, together with resulting debris redeposited in associated pits, were accompanied by a series of post-hole structures interpreted as round-houses and four-post settings. Environmental evidence in the form of charcoal, charred plant remains, and molluscs has provided important information concerning sources of fuel and water for pottery production as well as allowing a reconstruction of the local vegetation. Finds of fired clay, metal, stone, shale, flint, and bone include items from distant sources, informing topics such as site status and exchange, and include many categories of tools and equipment that would have been used within the pottery-making processes. Analysis of the spatial distribution of these finds amongst the structures and surviving layers of burning has allowed the definition of a series of industrial activity areas, each comprising one or more round-houses, a four-post structure, bonfire bases or pits used for firing, and other pits with specific related functions. Altogether the site has provided some of the best evidence for pottery production within prehistoric Britain.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Prehistoric Society 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below.

References

AC archaeology. 1995a. The Archaeological Assessment and Evaluation of Land Adjacent to the Former Foster's School, Tinney's Lane, Sherborne, Dorset. Unpublished report no. 1895/1/0Google Scholar
AC archaeology. 1995b. Further Archaeological Evaluation of Land Adjacent to the Former Foster's School, Tinney's Lane, Sherborne, Dorset. Unpublished client report no. 1895/2/0Google Scholar
Allen, M.J. & Bayliss, A. 2001. Radiocarbon dating. In Ellis, C.J. & Rawlings, M., Excavations at Balksbury Camp, Andover, 19951997. Proceedings of Hampshire Field Club & Archaeological Society 56, 2194Google Scholar
Ambers, J. & Bowman, S. 1998. Radiocarbon measurements from the British Museum: Datelist 24. Archaeometry 40, 413–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ambers, J. & Bowman, S. 1999. Radiocarbon measurements from the British Museum: Datelist 25. Archaeometry 41, 185–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anon. 1956. The utilisation of hazel coppice. In Forestry Commission Bulletin 27. London: HMSOGoogle Scholar
Arnold, D. 1981. A model for the identification of non-local ceramic distribution: a view from the present. In Howard, H. & Morris, E. (eds), Production and Distribution: a Ceramic Viewpoint, 3144. Oxford: British Archaeological Report S120Google Scholar
Arnold, D. 1985. Ceramic Theory and Cultural Process. Cambridge: University PressGoogle Scholar
Ashmore, P. 1999. Radiocarbon dating: avoiding errors by avoiding mixed samples. Antiquity 73, 124–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barclay, A., Boyle, A. & Keevill, G.D. 2001. A prehistoric enclosure at Eynsham Abbey, Oxfordshire. Oxoniensia 66, 105–62Google Scholar
Barrett, J.C. 1975. The later pottery: types, affinities, chronology and significance. In Bradley, R. & Ellison, A., Rams Hill: a Bronze Age defended enclosure and its landscape, 101–18. Oxford: British Archaeological Report 19Google Scholar
Barrett, J.C. 1980a. The pottery of the later Bronze Age in lowland England. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 46, 297320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barrett, J.C. 1980b. The prehistoric pottery. In Price, R. & Watts, L. 1980, Rescue excavations at Combe Hay, Somerset. Proceedings of the Somerset Archaeological & Natural History Society 124, 25–7Google Scholar
Barrett, J.C., Freeman, P.W.M. & Woodward, A. 2000. Cadbury Castle, Somerset. London: English Heritage Archaeological Report 20Google Scholar
Bayliss, A., Plicht, J. van der, Bronk Ramsey, C., McCormac, G., Healy, F. & Whittle, A. 2011. Towards generational time-scales: the quantitative interpretation of archaeological chronologies. In Whittle, A., Healy, F. & Bayliss., A., Gathering Time, 1759. Oxford: Oxbow BooksGoogle Scholar
Bell, M. 1990. Brean Down Excavations 1983–1987. London: English Heritage Archaeological Report 15Google Scholar
Bewley, R.H., Longworth, I. H., Browne, S., Huntley, J.P. & Varndell, G. 1992. Excavation of a Bronze Age cemetery at Ewanrigg, Maryport, Cumbria. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 58, 325–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowman, S. 1990. Radiocarbon dating. London: British MuseumGoogle Scholar
Bradley, R.J., Lobb, S., Richards, J. & Robinson, M. 1980. Two Late Bronze Age settlements on the Kennet Gravels: excavations at Aldermaston Wharf and Knight's Farm, Burghfield, Berkshire. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 46, 217–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bronk Ramsey, C. 1995. Radiocarbon calibration and analysis of stratigraphy. Radiocarbon 36, 425–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bronk Ramsey, C. 1998. Probability and dating. Radiocarbon 40, 461–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bronk Ramsey, C. 2001. Development of the radiocarbon calibration program. Radiocarbon 43, 355–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brossler, A., Early, R. & Allen, C. 2004. Green Park (Reading Business Park). Phase 2 Excavations 1995 – Neolithic and Bronze Age Sites. Oxford: Thames Valley Landscapes Monograph 19Google Scholar
Buck, C.E., Cavanagh, W.G. & Litton, C.D. 1996. Bayesian Approach to Interpreting Archaeological Data. ChichesterGoogle Scholar
Campbell, G. & Straker, V. 2003. Prehistoric crop husbandry and plant use in southern England: development and regionality. In Robson Brown, K.A. (ed.), Archaeological Sciences 1999. Proceedings of the Archaeological Sciences Conference, University of Bristol, 1999, 1430. Oxford: British Archaeological Report S1111Google Scholar
Cardew, M. 1969. Pioneer Pottery. London: LongmanGoogle Scholar
Carruthers, W. 1991. The carbonised plant remains from Rowden. In Woodward, P.J., The South Dorset Ridgeway. Survey and Excavations 1977–84, 106–11. Dorchester: Dorset Natural History & Archaeology Society Monograph 8Google Scholar
Carruthers, W. 2000. The mineralised plant remains. In Lawson, 2000, 7284Google Scholar
Chappell, H.G., Ainsworth, J.F., Cameron, R.A.D. & Redfern, M. 1971. The effect of trampling on a chalk grassland ecosystem. Journal of Applied Ecology 8, 869–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cleal, R. 1992. Pottery. In Smith, et al. 1992, 36–9Google Scholar
Cromarty, A.M., Barclay, A., Lambrick, G. & Robinson, M. 2006. Late Bronze Age Ritual and Habitation on a Thames Eyot at Whitecross Farm, Wallingford. The Archaeology of the Wallingford Bypass 1986–92. Oxford: Thames Valley Landscapes Monograph 22Google Scholar
Cunliffe, B. & Phillipson, D.W. 1968. Excavations at Eldon's Seat, Encombe, Dorset, England. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 34, 191237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dark, P. 2000. The Environment of Britain in the First Millenium AD. London: DuckworthGoogle Scholar
Drewett, P. 1982. Later Bronze Age downland economy and excavations at Black Patch, East Sussex. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 48, 321400CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edlin., H.L. 1949. Woodland Crafts in Britain. London: BatsfordGoogle Scholar
Elsdon, S.M. 1979. Baked clay objects: Iron Age, 197–210, in Wheeler H., The excavation at Willington, Derbyshire, 1970–1972. Derbyshire Archaeological Journal 99, 58220Google Scholar
Ford, S. 1987. Chronological and functional aspects of flint assemblages. In Brown, A.G. & Edmonds, M.R. (eds), Lithic Analysis and Later Prehistory. Some Problems and Approaches, 6783. Oxford: British Archaeological Report 162Google Scholar
Gibson, A. 2002. Prehistoric Pottery in Britain and Ireland. Stroud: TempusGoogle Scholar
Hamilton, S. 1995. Between ritual and routine: interpreting British prehistoric pottery production and distribution. In Woodward, A. & Hill, J.D. (eds), Prehistoric Britain: the Ceramic Basis, 3853. Oxford: Oxbow BooksGoogle Scholar
Hawkes, J.W. 1985. The prehistoric pottery. In Fasham, P.J., The Prehistoric Settlement at Winnall Down, Winchester, 60–9. Winchester: M3 Archaeological Rescue Committee Monograph 8Google Scholar
Healy, F. 2012. Chronology, corpses, copper and lithics. In Allen, M.J., Gardiner, J. & Sheridan, A. (eds), Is there a British Chalcolithic: people, place and polity in the later 3rd millennium, 144–63. Oxford: Prehistoric Society Research Papers 4Google Scholar
Hillman, G. 1984. Interpretation of archaeological plant remains: The application of ethnographic models from Turkey. In Van Zeist, W. & Caspaire, W.A. (eds), Plants and Ancient Man, 141. A.A. Balkema, RotterdamGoogle Scholar
Jackson, R. forthcoming. Huntsman's Quarry, Kemerton, Worcestershire: Late Bronze Age Settlement and Landscape. Oxford: Oxbow BooksGoogle Scholar
Jobey, G. 1970. An Iron Age settlement and homestead at Burradon, Northumberland. Archaeologia Aeliana 48, 5195Google Scholar
Jones, J. 2003. Analysis of charred plant macrofossil remains from Mitchell to Newlyn East Pipeline. Unpublished report prepared for Cornwall Archaeological UnitGoogle Scholar
Ladle, L. & Woodward, A. 2009. Excavations at Bestwall Quarry, Wareham 1992–2005. Volume 1: The Prehistoric Landscape. Dorchester: Dorset Natural History & Archaeological Society Monograph 19Google Scholar
Lawson, A.J. 2000. Potterne 1982–5: animal husbandry in later prehistoric Wiltshire. Salisbury: Wessex Archaeology Report 17Google Scholar
Levine, M. 1982. The use of crown height measurements and eruption wear sequences to age horse teeth. In Wilson, B., Grigson, C. & Payne, S. (eds), Ageing and Sexing Animal Bones from Archaeological Sites, 223–50. Oxford: British Archaeological Report 109Google Scholar
Locker, A. 2000. Animal bone. In Lawson, 2000, 101–17Google Scholar
Mook, W.G. 1986. Business meeting: Recommendations/Resolutions adopted by the Twelfth International Radiocarbon Conference. Radiocarbon 28, 799CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morris, E. L. 1992. The pottery, 13–23, in Coe D. & Newman R., Excavations of an Early Iron Age building and Romano-British enclosure at Brighton Hill South, Hampshire. Proceedings Hampshire Field Club Archaeological Society 48, 526Google Scholar
Morris, E. 1994. Production and distribution of pottery and salt in Iron Age Britain: a review. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 60, 371–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morris, E.L. 2004. Later prehistoric pottery. In Brossler, et al. 2004, 5891Google Scholar
Morris, E. and Woodward, A. 2003. Ceramic petrology and prehistoric pottery in the UK. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 69, 279303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Needham, S. 1991. Excavation and Salvage at Runnymede Bridge, 1978: The Late Bronze Age Waterfront Site. London: British Museum PressGoogle Scholar
Needham, S. 1996. Pottery production evidence. In Needham, and Spence, 1996, 162–4Google Scholar
Needham, S. & Ambers, J. 1994. Redating Rams Hill and reconsidering Bronze Age enclosure. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 60, 225–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Needham, S. & Spence, T. 1996. Refuse and Disposal at Area 16 East Runnymede: Runnymede Bridge Research Excavations, Volume 2. London: British Museum PressGoogle Scholar
Peacock, D. 1982. Pottery in the Roman World. London: LongmanGoogle Scholar
Phillipson, D.W. 1968. Animal bone. In Cunliffe, & Phillipson, 1968, 226–9Google Scholar
Poole, C. 1995. Study 14: loomweights versus oven bricks. In Cunliffe, B., Danebury: An Iron Age Hillfort in Hampshire. Volume 6, 285–6. York: Council for British Archaeology Research Report 102Google Scholar
Price, R. & Watts, L. 1980. Rescue excavations at Combe Hay, Somerset 1968–1973, Proceedings of the Somersetshire Archaeological & Natural History Society 124, 149Google Scholar
Reimer, P. J., Baillie, M. G. L., Bard, E., Bayliss, A., Beck, J. W., Bertrand, C., Blackwell, P. G., Buck, C. E., Burr, G. S., Cutter, K.B., Damon, P.E., Edwards, R. L., Fairbanks, R.G., Friedrich, M., Guilderson, T. P., Hughen, , Kromer, B., McCormac, F. G., Manning, S. W., Bronk Ramsey, C., Reimer, R. W., Remmele, S., Southon, J. R., Stuiver, M., Talamo, S., Taylor, F.W., Plicht, J. van der & Weyhenmeyer, C. E. 2004. IntCal04 terrestrial radiocarbon age calibration, 0–26 years cal kyr BP. Radiocarbon 46, 1029–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reynolds, P. 1995. The life and death of a post-hole. Interpreting Stratigraphy 5, 21–5Google Scholar
Rice, P. M. 1987. Pottery Analysis: a Sourcebook. Chicago & London: University of Chicago PressGoogle Scholar
Riegger, H. 1972. Primitive Pottery. NewYork: Van Nostrand ReinholdGoogle Scholar
Russell, M. 2002. Section 2. Excavations at Mile Oak Farm. In Rudling, D. (ed.), Downland Settlement and Land-Use: The Archaeology of the Brighton Bypass, 581London: Archetype Publications and English Heritage SeagerGoogle Scholar
Smith, R. 2000. Worked bone and antler. In Lawson, 2000, 222–40Google Scholar
Serjeantson, D. 1996. The animal bone. In Needham, & Spence, 1996, 194224Google Scholar
Smith, R., Rawlings, M. & Barnes, I. 1992. Excavations at Coburg Road and Weymouth Road, Fordington, Dorchester, Dorset 1988–9. Proceedings of the Dorset Natural History and Archaeological Society 114, 1945Google Scholar
Stenhouse, M.J. & Baxter, M.S. 1983. 14C dating reproducibility: evidence from routine dating of archaeological samples. PACT 8, 147–61Google Scholar
Straker, V. 1991. Charred plant macrofossils, 162–79, in Nowakowski J., Trethellan Farm, Newquay: Excavation of a lowland Bronze Age settlement and Iron Age cemetery. Cornish Archaeology 30, 5242Google Scholar
Stuiver, M. & Kra, R.S. 1986. Editorial comment. Radiocarbon 28(2B), iiGoogle Scholar
Stuiver, M. & Polach, H.A. 1977. Reporting of 14C data. Radiocarbon 19, 355–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stuiver, M. & Reimer, P.J. 1986. A computer program for radiocarbon age calculation. Radiocarbon 28, 1022–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stuiver, M. & Reimer, P.J. 1993. Extended 14C data base and revised CALIB 3.0 14C age calibration program. Radiocarbon 35, 215–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tobert, N. 1984. Ethno-archaeology of pottery firing in Darfur, Sudan: implications for ceramic technology studies. Oxford Journal of Archaeology 3(2), 141–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wainwright, G.J. & Davies, S.M. 1995. Balksbury Camp, Hampshire, Excavations 1973 and 1981. London: English Heritage Archaeological Report 4Google Scholar
Ward, G.K. & Wilson, S.R. 1978. Procedures for comparing and combining radiocarbon age determinations: a critique. Archaeometry 20, 1931CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodward, A. 1989. The prehistoric pottery, 39–53, in Ellis P., Norton Fitzwarren hillfort: a report on the excavations by Nancy and Philip Langmaid between 1968 and 1971. Proceedings of the Somersetshire Arhcaeological and Natural History Society 133, 174Google Scholar
Woodward, A. 1990. The Bronze Age pottery. In Bell, 1990, 121–45Google Scholar
Woodward, A. 2000. Prehistoric pottery. In Barrett, et al. 2000, 24–41, 62–6, 214–9, 259–61, 302–13, 325–46Google Scholar
Woodward, A. & Jackson, R. forthcoming. Prehistoric pottexry. In Jackson forthcomingGoogle Scholar

Full text views

Full text views reflects PDF downloads, PDFs sent to Google Drive, Dropbox and Kindle and HTML full text views.

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 133 *
View data table for this chart

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 24th January 2021. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Hostname: page-component-76cb886bbf-2rmft Total loading time: 0.775 Render date: 2021-01-24T10:38:43.696Z Query parameters: { "hasAccess": "0", "openAccess": "0", "isLogged": "0", "lang": "en" } Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": false, "newCiteModal": false }

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Late Bronze Age Pottery Production: Evidence from a 12th–11th century cal bc Settlement at Tinney's Lane, Sherborne, Dorset
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Late Bronze Age Pottery Production: Evidence from a 12th–11th century cal bc Settlement at Tinney's Lane, Sherborne, Dorset
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Late Bronze Age Pottery Production: Evidence from a 12th–11th century cal bc Settlement at Tinney's Lane, Sherborne, Dorset
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response


Your details


Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *