Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4rdrl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-15T03:42:12.435Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A nutritional modelling framework for inclusion in a Norwegian food system model

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 May 2024

R. Lozano
Affiliation:
Sustainable Nutrition Initiative, Riddet Institute, Massey University, Private Bag 11222, Palmerston North 4472, New Zealand
N.W. Smith
Affiliation:
Sustainable Nutrition Initiative, Riddet Institute, Massey University, Private Bag 11222, Palmerston North 4472, New Zealand
W. McNabb
Affiliation:
Sustainable Nutrition Initiative, Riddet Institute, Massey University, Private Bag 11222, Palmerston North 4472, New Zealand
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The aim of this study was to apply a comprehensive mathematical model designed to assess the current and future availability of food, as well as the resulting nutrient availability and intake, in the context of the Norwegian population. The model explores various scenarios, including self-sufficiency levels for food supply and impacts on nutrition recommendations. A food mass balance charting production, import, export, feed, seed, and consumer allocation in the Norwegian food system provided insights into the nutrients available to the population. The analysis included a comparison with two versions of the Nordic Nutrient Recommendations (NNR)1, with the latest version recommending substantial changes in food consumption compared to current dietary patterns in Norway. The nutrient analysis compared the food mass to Matvaretabellen2 and was supplemented with data from the United Nations World Population Prospects3 and the Food and Agriculture Organisation/World Health Organisation/United Nations4 report to ensure comprehensive nutrient analysis. Micronutrient gaps were observed in Iodine (94% of the target intake) and Vitamin D (46% of the target intake), while saturated-fatty acids slightly exceeded the recommended requirements (107% of the upper limit) based on the current baseline scenario. The updated NNR4 recommends changes to specific food categories, namely fruits, vegetables, nuts, and seeds. A secondary scenario testing compared against the updated NNR found that increasing the availability of the supply of these groups does not result in any new nutrient gaps, demonstrating the feasibility of addressing the issue on a national supply basis. These approach offers a mathematical-modelling based tool that can be used to provide information for a national food system. Leveraging the model’s capacity to simulate various scenarios, informed decisions to optimise self-sufficiency levels and align food supply with recommended nutritional guidelines can be made. To improve the model, higher data resolution and clearer categorisation of food groups are required which can then be linked into a more complete national food system. The mathematical model presented in this study provides a framework for understanding of food and nutrient availability in Norway. By identifying critical nutrient gaps and potential solutions, this research contributes knowledge for a healthier and sustainable food future for the nation.

Type
Abstract
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Nutrition Society

References

Nordic Council of Ministers (2012) https://www.norden.org/en/publication/nordic-nutrition-recommendations-2012 (last accessed August 2023)Google Scholar
Norwegian Food Composition Database (2022) https://www.matvaretabellen.no/ (last accessed August 2023)Google Scholar
World Population Prospects (2022) https://population.un.org/wpp/ Google Scholar
FAO, WHO & UNU (2007) https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/43411 (last accessed August 2023)Google Scholar
Nordic Council of Ministers (2023) https://www.norden.org/en/publication/nordic-nutrition-recommendations-2023 (last accessed August 2023)Google Scholar