Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-fwgfc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-12T01:19:14.924Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effects of substituting red and processed red meats with faba beans on nutrient intake and environmental impact in UK adults

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 January 2024

C.O. Bonham
Affiliation:
Hugh Sinclair Unit of Human Nutrition
Y. Kaimila
Affiliation:
Hugh Sinclair Unit of Human Nutrition The University of Malawi, Zomba, Malawi
O.A. Olotu
Affiliation:
Hugh Sinclair Unit of Human Nutrition
M.E. Clegg
Affiliation:
Hugh Sinclair Unit of Human Nutrition Institute of Food, Nutrition and Health
K.G. Jackson
Affiliation:
Hugh Sinclair Unit of Human Nutrition Institute of Food, Nutrition and Health Institute for Cardiovascular Metabolic Research, Harry Nursten Building, Pepper Lane, University of Reading, Reading, UK
J.A. Lovegrove
Affiliation:
Hugh Sinclair Unit of Human Nutrition Institute of Food, Nutrition and Health Institute for Cardiovascular Metabolic Research, Harry Nursten Building, Pepper Lane, University of Reading, Reading, UK
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Type
Abstract
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Nutrition Society

Red and processed red meat consumption has been associated with increased cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk, greenhouse gas emissions and land use compared with plant-based diets(Reference Abete, Romaguera and Vieira1,Reference Xu, Sharma and Shu2,Reference Marventano, Pulido and Sanchez-Gonzalez3) . Pulses (dry edible seeds of the legume family), a nutrient-rich plant food, are poorly consumed in UK diet's which are typically high in meat. A particularly under consumed pulse is the faba (broad) bean, a nitrogen fixing, high yielding sustainable UK crop(Reference Baddeley, Jones and Topp4). The objectives of these analyses were to determine i) associations between total meat consumption and nutrient intake, land use and CO2 emissions ii) the impact of increasing faba bean intake at the expense of red and processed red meat in the average UK diet on nutrient intake, CO2 emissions and land use.

The 4-day diet diary data from the UK National Diet and Nutrition Survey 2008–2019 for adults (19–64 years: n = 6136) was used. For objective i) these data were split into non-consumers of meat and tertiles of meat intake. Linear regression analysis (covariates: dietary energy, sex and age) compared nutrient intakes, land use and CO2emissions(Reference Hobbs, Durrant and Elliott5)according to the level of meat consumption. For objective ii) the mean dietary intake for men (n = 2519) and women (n = 3617) were calculated, and varying quantities (10%-100%) of red and processed red meat were substituted by faba beans. The nutrient intakes across levels of substitution were compared to reference nutrient intakes (RNI).

Diets with the higher meat intakes (Tertile 3: 126–1000g/d) were associated with significantly lower CO2 emissions (70.1 ± 24.5kgCO2eqv) and land usage (77.2 ± 29.2m2d) compared with the diet of non-meat consumers (77.8 ± 34.8kgCO2eqv, 88.8 ± 40.7m2d respectively), but significantly higher CO2 emissions compared to diets with lower meat intake (Tertile 1: 1–76g/d) (65.4 ± 29.4kgCO2eqv) (all p < 0.01). Increasing substitution of red and processed red meat with faba beans in the average diet of men and women were associated with higher dietary intakes of total iron, AOAC fibre, potassium and magnesium, and lower dietary fats, haem iron, CO2 emissions and land usage, where magnesium RNI was met at 20% substitution of both red and processed red meat, and at 100% of red meat substitution in females.

In conclusion, we found that diets highest in total meat were associated with higher fat and haem iron intakes and environmental impact when compared to those lower in meat, although not to non-meat consumers.

Furthermore, substitution of faba beans in replacement of red and processed red meat on a modelled average UK diet resulted in an increase in micronutrients, to levels closer to, or reaching RNI's, and a lower environmental impact. These data support recommendations to reduce red and processed red meat intake and move to a more plant-based diet.

Acknowledgments

Funding received from BBSRC (BB/W017946) for “Raising the Pulse” study

References

Abete, I, Romaguera, D, Vieira, AR et al. (2014) Br J Nutr 112, 762–75.10.1017/S000711451400124XCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xu, XM, Sharma, P, Shu, SJ et al. (2021) Nat Food 2, 724.10.1038/s43016-021-00358-xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marventano, S, Pulido, MI, Sanchez-Gonzalez, C et al. (2017) Public Health Nutr 20, 245–54.10.1017/S1368980016002299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baddeley, JA, Jones, S, Topp, CFE et al. (2013) Legumes Futures Report 1(5).Google Scholar
Hobbs, DA, Durrant, C, Elliott, J et al. (2020) Eur J Nutr 59, 895908.10.1007/s00394-019-01949-yCrossRefGoogle Scholar