Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-nmvwc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-18T04:49:54.124Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The effects of changes in estradiol and progesterone concentrations during the menstrual cycle on resting metabolic rate

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 October 2011

S. E. Hillier ,
M. C. Venables  and
R. P. Craven
S. E. Hillier
Affiliation:
Functional Food Centre, Oxford Brookes University, OX3 0BP, UK
M. C. Venables
Affiliation:
Functional Food Centre, Oxford Brookes University, OX3 0BP, UK Human Health and Performance Research Group, Oxford Brookes University, OX3 0BP, UK
R. P. Craven
Affiliation:
Functional Food Centre, Oxford Brookes University, OX3 0BP, UK
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content. As you have access to this content, full HTML content is provided on this page. A PDF of this content is also available in through the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Type
Abstract
Information
Proceedings of the Nutrition Society , Volume 70 , Issue OCE4: Summer Meeting, 4–6 July 2011, 70th Anniversary: From plough through practice to policy , 2011 , E125
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2011

There is some debate as to whether resting metabolic rate (RMR) fluctuates during different phases of the menstrual cycle as a result of changes in estradiol and progesterone concentrations(Reference Solomon, Kurzer and Calloway1, Reference Meijer, Westerterp and Saris2). One reason for this could be the failure to establish accurate menstrual phase definition through biochemical analysis of hormone concentrations. The aim of this study was to investigate RMR at three set time points during the menstrual cycle.

Venous blood samples for baseline measurements of estradiol and progesterone were collected every other week day from eight naturally cycling women for one complete menstrual cycle; age 28 (sd 3) years, weight 62.04 (sd 9.75) kg and height 1.69 (sd 0.09) m. Indirect calorimetry using a ventilated hood system (Deltatrac, Datex Instrumentarium Corp., Helsinki, Finland) to calculate RMR was performed on three test sessions during one complete menstrual cycle. In the 24 h period prior to each RMR measurement participants replicated their diet and avoided exercise, caffeine and alcohol.

Venous blood samples were taken before each test session to confirm estradiol and progesterone levels. Participants were supine for 30 min to allow initial stabilisation and acclimatisation to the canopy and instrument noise. Respiratory gas exchange data were then collected for a further 30 min and an average RMR was calculated. Data are presented as means (sd). Variables were analysed using one-way repeated measures ANOVA. Significance was accepted at the P<0.05 level.

Fig. 1. Plasma estradiol concentration.

Fig. 2. Plasma progesterone concentration.

Fig. 3. RMR.

*Significant difference between test sessions. M, menstruation; F, follicular; L, luteal.

Hormone concentrations differed significantly during one complete menstrual cycle (estradiol and progesterone; Figs. 1 and 2, respectively); however, there was no significant difference in RMR between the three test sessions (Fig. 3). This suggests that fluctuations in estradiol and progesterone during the menstrual cycle may not influence RMR. If this is the case the results confirm previous research that suggests RMR can be considered as a stable tool for estimating energy requirement in women(Reference Soares, Piers and Kraai3).

References

1.Solomon, SJ, Kurzer, MS & Calloway, DH (1982) Am J Clin Nutr 36, 611–616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Meijer, GAL, Westerterp, KR, Saris, WHM et al. (1992) Am J Clin Nutr 55, 637–640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Soares, MJ, Piers, LS, Kraai, L et al. (1989) Eur J Clin Nutr 43, 465–472.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Plasma estradiol concentration.

Figure 1

Fig. 2. Plasma progesterone concentration.

Figure 2

Fig. 3. RMR.