Last updated 10th July 2024: Online ordering is currently unavailable due to technical issues. We apologise for any delays responding to customers while we resolve this. For further updates please visit our website https://www.cambridge.org/news-and-insights/technical-incident
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
This journal utilises an Online Peer Review Service (OPRS) for submissions. By clicking "Continue" you will be taken to our partner site
https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/pdm.
Please be aware that your Cambridge account is not valid for this OPRS and registration is required. We strongly advise you to read all "Author instructions" in the "Journal information" area prior to submitting.
To save this undefined to your undefined account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your undefined account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
A retrospective study of patients transported by paramedics to a community teaching hospital was conducted to: 1) determine the response of hypoglycemic patients to prehospital treatments, 2) develop criteria to identify patients who safely could be released without transport to a hospital, and 3) evaluate the prehospital release criteria.
Methods:
Patients presenting to EMT-paramedics with an altered level of consciousness were identified retrospectively. Pre- and post-treatment blood glucose levels were measured and response to treatment noted (Phase 1). Criteria were established using these data and a second sample was evaluated using these criteria (Phase 2).
Results:
During a 12-month period, 60 patients with an altered level of consciousness (ALOC) were encountered. Of the 60 patients, 27 (45%) were documented to be hypoglycemic (blood glucose [BG] <80 mg/dl, mean 27±13 mg/dl). Of the 27 hypoglycemic patients, 24 (89%) were discharged from the emergency department (ED) and three patients (11%) were admitted. Criteria were developed to identify patients who could be treated and released safely without transport to a hospital: 1) history of insulin (IDDM) or non-insulin (NIDDM) dependent diabetes mellitus; 2) pre-treatment BG <80 mg/dl; 3) post-treatment BG >80 mg/dl; 4) return to normal mental status within 10 minutes of treatment; and 5) absence of complicating factors (renal dialysis, chest pain, arrhythmia, dyspnea, seizures, alcohol intoxication, focal neurological signs/symptoms). The criteria were applied retrospectively to 27 hypoglycemic (mean BG=28±14 mg/dl) patients during a different 10-month period. Of the 27 hypoglycemic patients, 23 (85%) were discharged from the ED, and prehospital release criteria correctly identified 19 of 23 (83%). The prehospital release criteria did not select for release any patient who required an additional, major intervention or who was admitted.
Conclusion:
This study demonstrates that there is a group of hypoglycemic patients who respond favorably to paramedic interventions. Retrospectively, the prehospital release criteria were successful in selecting patients who did not require additional interventions. A larger prospective study must be conducted before prehospital treatment and release can be recommended for general practice.
A daily EMS audit was performed to assess whether a paramedic peer review audit would improve the quality of documentation and radio communications in cases transported to a single receiving facility.
Methods:
Prehospital EMS run sheets and run tapes were reviewed for adherence to standards developed for the county EMS system. Items evaluated were run sheet documentation of care and paramedic radio presentation. Checklists were used and multiple parameters evaluated for each case. Two periods, 1987–88 and 1989 were compared to evaluate the effectiveness of this system. Care rendered by a total of 106 paramedics was evaluated. Confidence intervals of 0.95 were calculated on the differences between groups. Practicing paramedics audited 63% of the days in 1987–88 and 80% in 1989. Data from each case were tabulated and a profile, average deficiencies per run calculated for each paramedic.
Results:
A total of 4175 run sheets and tapes were audited for the period 1987–88 with an average of deficiencies/run of 0.27, and for 1989 a total of 1872 run sheets and tapes were reviewed with a deficiency/run rate of 0.21, indicating a statistically significant improvement (0.95 CI= 0.02, 0.08). Twelve paramedics were not auditors in 1987–88, but audited in 1989. Their deficiencies/run decreased from 0.13 to 0.08
Conclusion:
A peer review audit in this system appears to be effective in improving documentation and radio performance. Performance also improved when paramedics served as auditors.
Patients initially refusing care (PIRC) place their health in jeopardy and consume paramedic and base-station physician time. This study quantifies the time spent on-scene related to PIRC cases.
Methods:
A retrospective analysis of 128 PIRC cases was performed in the Multomah County EMS system.
Results:
The PIRC cases had a significantly longer mean on-scene time than did non-refusal cases (30.3 vs 14.6 min; p<.001). Medication administration by paramedics (14% of patients) significantly increased the on-scene time. Overall, the mean time on-scene was not affected by age, gender, vital signs (pulse, blood pressure, respiratory rate), police involvement, and whether the patient was transported. The type of call had limited influence on on-scene time, although mean on-scene time was significantly longer for altered mental status cases than for trauma related cases (35.6 vs 22.4 min; p<.03).
Conclusions:
PIRC cases create a burden on the EMS system by consuming paramedic and base-station physician time and by preventing these personnel from responding to other calls.
The concept of Urban Heavy Rescue is gaining increasing recognition within the emergency response community. Urban Heavy Rescue has come to denote the unique demands for special equipment and personnel as the result of structural collapse. Recent earthquakes in California, the Philippines, and Soviet Armenia as well as the building collapses in Brownsville, Texas, and New York City provided excellent demonstrations of the concept of specialized structural collapse teams. These events even have prompted the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) to establish a National Urban Search and Rescue System of special task forces trained in victim location and extrication from collapsed structures. This system will comprise an immediate federal response mechanism for assisting first responders in such activities. The National Search and Rescue System was based on post-event evaluations that pointed out a need not only for more applicable equipment and trained personnel, but also for the timely placement of the these resources.
The use of bronch odilators in the prehospital EMS setting is common. This study examined the safety of the administration of 2.5 mg albuterol using a hand-held nebulizer for the treatment of such patients.
A total of 55 patients were included. Following treatment, peak expiratory flow rates (PEFR) increased a mean of 27 L/min, ventilatory rate decreased four breaths/min, heart rate decreased slightly, and systolic blood pressure increased 10 mmHg. Five of the 53 patients in whom cardiac rhythm was monitored, had premature ventricular complexes prior to treatment; only one did following therapy. Breath sounds improved in 61% and were unchanged in 39%. Breathing was reported by the patient as improved in 51 of the 53 (93%) and only one felt worse. Adverse reactions were reported in 15%, but none were severe. This study shows that albuterol (2.5 mg) administration by hand-held nebulizer is both safe and efficacious in the prehospital setting.
The risk of exposure to the Hepatitis B Virus (HBV) is a known occupational health risk in medical personnel. The specific risk in emergency medical services (EMS) personnel in the United States (U.S.) is not known. Estimates have ranged from 0.6 to 30.0% The purpose of this investigation was to provide an estimate of the prevalence of this exposure, to determine if this risk is homogeneous throughout the U.S., and to provide an estimate of relative risk. The study hypothesis was that the risk of exposure to HBV is not homogeneous throughout the U.S.
Methods:
All articles containing HBV studies of non-immunized EMS personnel (physicians, nurses, and emergency medical service technicians [EMTs]) were considered, provided they reported at least two of the following seromarkers: hepatitis B (HB) surface antigen; HB surface antibody; and/or HB core antibody. A computerized literature search of a database (MEDLARS) from 1980–1989 was performed. Reference sections of relevant articles and texts also were searched. The chi-square test of homogeneity of proportion was used, assuming binomial distribution. The alpha error rate was set at 0.05.
Results:
Seven articles from 1982 to 1989 qualified for inclusion. The average rate of prevalence for all studies was 14.04% (160/1,140), with a 95% confidence interval of 11.40 to 16.68%. The chi-square test was statistically significant (chi-square=12.59, 6 df, p<.01), suggesting that the risk of exposure is not homogeneous throughout the U.S., and may not be homogeneous within a city, nor between prehospital and hospital personnel. When compared to CDC estimates for the general population in the U.S., this analysis suggests that the EMS personnel tested run three times (2.8) greater risk of HBV exposure than does the general population.
Conclusion:
EMS personnel run a great risk of exposure to HBV with a nationwide prevalence of 14.04%, but this risk is not spread homogeneously throughout the country.