Last updated 10th July 2024: Online ordering is currently unavailable due to technical issues. We apologise for any delays responding to customers while we resolve this. For further updates please visit our website https://www.cambridge.org/news-and-insights/technical-incident
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
This journal utilises an Online Peer Review Service (OPRS) for submissions. By clicking "Continue" you will be taken to our partner site
https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/pdm.
Please be aware that your Cambridge account is not valid for this OPRS and registration is required. We strongly advise you to read all "Author instructions" in the "Journal information" area prior to submitting.
To save this undefined to your undefined account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your undefined account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
The purpose of this study is to describe treatment of asthma in children by paramedics.
Design:
Retrospective review of an advanced life support (ALS) run reports over a one-year period.
Setting:
Review of paramedic response to pediatric respiratory emergencies in an urban, primarily inner-city, prioritized, dual-response emergency medical services (EMS) system.
Participants:
Patients < 19 years of age complaining of shortness of breath, paramedics, pediatric residents, and attending physicians.
Measurements and Main Results:
The medical records of 383 patients were reviewed for demographic and medical information. The population was separated into an ALS treatment group (received ALS) and a NO-ALS group (evaluation and/or oxygen only). Sixty percent of the patients (n = 231) were classified into the ALS group; 89% received epinephrine. Sixty-six percent (n = 101) of the NO-ALS patients received evaluation only, and the remaining 34% (n = 51) were evaluated and received oxygen. The ALS patients were older and had significantly higher respiratory rates and accessory muscle use than did the NO-ALS patients. Relief was reported in 66 % of ALS patients. No adverse reactions were reported in the ALS group. Determining factors influencing ALS treatment included age, the use of medications at home, wheezing, accessory muscle use, respiratory rate, and presence or absence of upper respiratory infection (URI) symptoms.
Conclusions:
This study demonstrates that asthma constitutes the majority of pediatric emergencies in the prehospital setting in this inner-city EMS system. The ALS treatment of pediatric asthma improves patient status. Factors which may influence paramedic judgment in treating asthma in children may be inappropriate. There is a critical need for further research in the prehospital treatment of pediatric asthma and in developing education interventions directed at the entire spectrum of prehospital care of pediatric emergencies.