Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c47g7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T06:02:02.503Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Measuring residual stresses in stainless steel—recent experiences within a VAMAS exercise

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 March 2012

A. T. Fry  and
J. D. Lord
A. T. Fry
Affiliation:
National Physical Laboratory, Teddington, Middlesex TW11 0LW, United Kingdom
J. D. Lord
Affiliation:
National Physical Laboratory, Teddington, Middlesex TW11 0LW, United Kingdom
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Residual stresses impact on a wide variety of industrial sectors including the automotive, power generation, industrial plant, construction, aerospace, railway and transport industries, and a range of materials manufacturers and processing companies. The X-ray diffraction (XRD) technique is one of the most popular methods for measuring residual stress (Kandil et al., 2001) used routinely in quality control and materials characterization for validating models and design. The VAMAS TWA20 Project 3 activity on the “Measurement of Residual Stresses by X-ray Diffraction” was initiated by NPL in 2005 to examine various aspects of the XRD test procedure in support of work aimed at developing an international standard in this area. The purpose of this project was to examine and reduce some of the sources of scatter and uncertainty in the measurement of residual stress by X-ray diffraction on metallic materials, through an international intercomparison and validation exercise. One of the major issues the intercomparison highlighted was the problem associated with measuring residual stresses in austenitic stainless steel. The following paper describes this intercomparison, reviews the results of the exercise and details additional work looking at developing best practice for measuring residual stresses in austenitic stainless steel, for which X-ray measurements are somewhat unreliable and problematic.

Keywords

residual stressX-ray diffractionVAMASintercomparisonstainless steel
Type
Applications Of Residual Stress Analysis
Information
Powder Diffraction , Volume 24 , Supplement S1 , June 2009 , pp. S41 - S44
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Fitzpatrick, M. E., Fry, A. T., Holdway, P., Kandil, F. A., Shackleton, J., and Suominen, L. (2005). Measurement Good Practice Guide No. 52: Determination of Residual Stresses by X-ray Diffraction–Issue 2 (NPL, Teddington, UK. ISSN 1744-3911).Google Scholar
Fry, A. T. and Kandil, F. A. (2002). “A study of parameters affecting the quality of residual stress measurements using XRD,” Mater. Sci. ForumMSFOEP 404–407, 579–584.10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.404-407.579CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fry, A. T. and Lord, J. D. (2006). “Measuring the variation of residual stress with depth: A validation exercise for fine incremental hole drilling,” Mater. Sci. ForumMSFOEP 524–525, 531–536.10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.524-525.531CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grant, P., Lord, J., Whitehead, P., and Fry, T. (2005). “The application of fine increment hole drilling for measuring machining-induced residual stresses,” Appl. Mech. Mater. 3–4, 105–110.10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.3-4.105Google Scholar
Hauk, V. (1997). Structural and Residual Stress Analysis by Nondestructive Methods (Elsevier, New York).Google Scholar
Kandil, F. A., Lord, J. D., Fry, A. T., and Grant, P. V. (2001). A Review of Residual Stress Measurement Methods—A Guide to Technique Selection [NPL Report No. MATC(A)04].Google Scholar
Lord, J. D., Grant, P. V., Fry, A. T., and Kandil, F. A. (2002). “A UK residual stress intercomparison exercise–development of measurement good practice for the XRD and hole drilling technique,” Mater. Sci.Forum 404–407, 567–572.10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.404-407.567CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SAE (2003). International Guide on Residual Stress Measurement by X-ray Diffraction–2003 Edition (SAE, Warrendale, PA).Google Scholar